Comment on: “Peatland carbon stocks and burn history: Blanket bog peat core evidence highlights charcoal impacts on peat physical properties and long-term carbon storage,” by A. Heinemeyer, Q. Asena, W. L. Burn and A. L. Jones (Geo: Geography and Environment 2018; e00063)

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Geo-Geography and Environment Pub Date : 2019-06-19 DOI:10.1002/geo2.75
Chris D. Evans, Andy J. Baird, Sophie M. Green, Susan E. Page, Michael Peacock, Mark S. Reed, Neil L. Rose, Rob Stoneman, Tim J. Thom, Dylan M. Young, Mark H. Garnett
{"title":"Comment on: “Peatland carbon stocks and burn history: Blanket bog peat core evidence highlights charcoal impacts on peat physical properties and long-term carbon storage,” by A. Heinemeyer, Q. Asena, W. L. Burn and A. L. Jones (Geo: Geography and Environment 2018; e00063)","authors":"Chris D. Evans,&nbsp;Andy J. Baird,&nbsp;Sophie M. Green,&nbsp;Susan E. Page,&nbsp;Michael Peacock,&nbsp;Mark S. Reed,&nbsp;Neil L. Rose,&nbsp;Rob Stoneman,&nbsp;Tim J. Thom,&nbsp;Dylan M. Young,&nbsp;Mark H. Garnett","doi":"10.1002/geo2.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A recent paper by Heinemeyer et al. (2018) in this journal has suggested that the use of prescribed fire may enhance carbon accumulation in UK upland blanket bogs. We challenge this finding based on a number of concerns with the original manuscript including the lack of an unburned control, insufficient replication, unrecognised potential confounding factors, and potentially large inaccuracies in the core dating approach used to calculate carbon accumulation rates. We argue that burn-management of peatlands is more likely to lead to carbon loss than carbon gain.</p><p>e00075\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":44089,"journal":{"name":"Geo-Geography and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/geo2.75","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geo-Geography and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geo2.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A recent paper by Heinemeyer et al. (2018) in this journal has suggested that the use of prescribed fire may enhance carbon accumulation in UK upland blanket bogs. We challenge this finding based on a number of concerns with the original manuscript including the lack of an unburned control, insufficient replication, unrecognised potential confounding factors, and potentially large inaccuracies in the core dating approach used to calculate carbon accumulation rates. We argue that burn-management of peatlands is more likely to lead to carbon loss than carbon gain.

e00075

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评论:《泥炭地碳储量和燃烧历史:地铺沼泽泥炭核心证据突出了木炭对泥炭物理性质和长期碳储量的影响》,作者:A. Heinemeyer、Q. Asena、W. L. burn和A. L. Jones (Geo:地理与环境,2018;e00063)
Heinemeyer等人(2018)最近在该杂志上发表的一篇论文表明,使用规定的火可能会增加英国高地毯状沼泽的碳积累。我们对这一发现提出了质疑,这是基于对原始手稿的一些担忧,包括缺乏未燃烧的控制,复制不足,未识别的潜在混淆因素,以及用于计算碳积累速率的岩心定年方法中潜在的巨大不准确性。我们认为,泥炭地的燃烧管理更可能导致碳损失而不是碳增加。[00075
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Geo is a fully open access international journal publishing original articles from across the spectrum of geographical and environmental research. Geo welcomes submissions which make a significant contribution to one or more of the journal’s aims. These are to: • encompass the breadth of geographical, environmental and related research, based on original scholarship in the sciences, social sciences and humanities; • bring new understanding to and enhance communication between geographical research agendas, including human-environment interactions, global North-South relations and academic-policy exchange; • advance spatial research and address the importance of geographical enquiry to the understanding of, and action about, contemporary issues; • foster methodological development, including collaborative forms of knowledge production, interdisciplinary approaches and the innovative use of quantitative and/or qualitative data sets; • publish research articles, review papers, data and digital humanities papers, and commentaries which are of international significance.
期刊最新文献
Place-based and people-centred: Principles for a socially inclusive Net Zero transition ‘Side-hustling’ in commercial agriculture among young university graduates in Ghana Electric feels: The role of visual methods in energy ‘futuring’ Street vendors as actors of a sustainable food system—The case of Mexico City Deep learning for sea surface temperature applications: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis and methodological approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1