[Tachyphylaxis to local anesthetics].

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1989-01-01
P Lipfert
{"title":"[Tachyphylaxis to local anesthetics].","authors":"P Lipfert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tachyphylaxis to local anesthetics is defined as decrease in duration, segmental spread, or intensity of a regional block after repeated doses of equal size, i.e. to maintain a given level of effect the dose has to be increased. In contrast, time-dependent variations in pain or circadian changes in the duration of local anesthetic action only simulate the occurrence of tachyphylaxis (pseudotachyphylaxis). Tachyphylaxis appears neither to be linked to structural (ester vs amide) or pharmacological properties of the local anesthetics (short- vs long-acting) nor to technique (surface anesthesia, conduction block, spinal, caudal, or epidural anesthesia, brachial plexus block) or mode of administration (intermittent vs continuous). There is even disagreement about the clinical significance of tachyphylaxis because some authors found it in almost every patient, others less often whereas a third group did not find tachyphylaxis at all. The mechanisms underlying tachyphylaxis are open to debate. Changes in pharmacokinetics (local alterations of disposition and absorption; decrease of perineural pH) and pharmacodynamics (antagonistic effects of nucleotides or increased sodium concentration; increase in afferent input) have been implicated. None of the theoretical considerations presented are strong enough to explain tachyphylaxis. However, results from isolated nerve preparations suggest that pharmacokinetics rather than pharmacodynamics might play a role in the development of tachyphylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"12 1","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tachyphylaxis to local anesthetics is defined as decrease in duration, segmental spread, or intensity of a regional block after repeated doses of equal size, i.e. to maintain a given level of effect the dose has to be increased. In contrast, time-dependent variations in pain or circadian changes in the duration of local anesthetic action only simulate the occurrence of tachyphylaxis (pseudotachyphylaxis). Tachyphylaxis appears neither to be linked to structural (ester vs amide) or pharmacological properties of the local anesthetics (short- vs long-acting) nor to technique (surface anesthesia, conduction block, spinal, caudal, or epidural anesthesia, brachial plexus block) or mode of administration (intermittent vs continuous). There is even disagreement about the clinical significance of tachyphylaxis because some authors found it in almost every patient, others less often whereas a third group did not find tachyphylaxis at all. The mechanisms underlying tachyphylaxis are open to debate. Changes in pharmacokinetics (local alterations of disposition and absorption; decrease of perineural pH) and pharmacodynamics (antagonistic effects of nucleotides or increased sodium concentration; increase in afferent input) have been implicated. None of the theoretical considerations presented are strong enough to explain tachyphylaxis. However, results from isolated nerve preparations suggest that pharmacokinetics rather than pharmacodynamics might play a role in the development of tachyphylaxis.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部麻醉药的快速反应。
对局麻药的快速反应被定义为重复等量给药后持续时间、局部扩散或区域阻滞强度减少,即为了维持给定的效果水平,必须增加剂量。相比之下,疼痛的时间依赖性变化或局部麻醉作用持续时间的昼夜变化仅模拟速发性反应(假性速发性反应)的发生。速发性反应似乎与局麻药的结构(酯与酰胺)或药理学性质(短效与长效)无关,也与技术(表面麻醉、传导阻滞、脊髓、尾侧或硬膜外麻醉、臂丛阻滞)或给药方式(间歇与连续)无关。甚至对于速发性反应的临床意义也存在分歧,因为一些作者发现几乎每个病人都有,而另一些则较少,而第三组根本没有发现速发性反应。快速反应的机制有待讨论。药代动力学的变化(局部处置和吸收的改变;神经周围pH值降低)和药效学(核苷酸或钠浓度升高的拮抗作用;传入输入的增加也有牵连。所提出的理论考虑都不足以解释速过敏反应。然而,分离神经制剂的结果表明,药代动力学而不是药效学可能在快速反应的发展中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[An epidural spinal abscess as a lethal complication of peridural anesthesia]. [Knotting of a peridural catheter]. [A simple technique for estimating the level of analgesia in regional anesthesia]. [CSE--the combination of spinal and epidural anesthesia]. [Comments on the paper by R. Schürg et al. Maternal and neonatal plasma concentrations of bupivacaine during peridural anesthesia for cesarean section].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1