Robust action and scenarios: A rejoinder

Nicholas J. Rowland, Matthew J. Spaniol
{"title":"Robust action and scenarios: A rejoinder","authors":"Nicholas J. Rowland,&nbsp;Matthew J. Spaniol","doi":"10.1002/ffo2.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is a rejoinder in response to commentaries written about a 25-year retrospective on Kees van der Heijden's seminal text <i>Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation</i>. As a means to explore the commentaries and—without irony—bring them into conversation with one another, this piece engages in a thought experiment about the impact of <i>Scenarios</i> as well as the book's author through the sociologically informed notion of robust action from traditional thinking about social embeddedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":100567,"journal":{"name":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ffo2.128","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a rejoinder in response to commentaries written about a 25-year retrospective on Kees van der Heijden's seminal text Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. As a means to explore the commentaries and—without irony—bring them into conversation with one another, this piece engages in a thought experiment about the impact of Scenarios as well as the book's author through the sociologically informed notion of robust action from traditional thinking about social embeddedness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健壮的行动和场景:一个反驳
这篇文章是对Kees van der Heijden的开创性文本《情景:战略对话的艺术》25年回顾的评论的回应。作为一种探索评论的方式——不带讽刺意味地——将他们带入彼此的对话中,这篇文章通过对社会嵌入性的传统思考中强健行动的社会学知识概念,参与了一个关于情景影响的思想实验,以及这本书的作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Simplification errors in predictive models Don't push the wrong button. The concept of microperspective in futures research Science fiction in military planning—Case allied command transformation and visions of warfare 2036
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1