{"title":"MTNR1B rs1387153 Polymorphism and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.","authors":"Dan Shan, Ao Wang, Ke Yi","doi":"10.1159/000535148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Published data on the association between the MTNR1B rs1387153 polymorphism and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk are controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A meta-analysis was performed to assess whether the polymorphism of MTNR1B rs1387153 is associated with GDM risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Medline, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Biomedicine Databases were searched to identify eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MTNR1B rs1387153 polymorphism and GDM were appropriately derived from fixed-effects or random effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled analyses revealed that MTNR1B rs1387153 polymorphism significantly increased the risk of GDM in all models (allele contrast (C vs. T): OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.83; homozygote (CC vs. TT): OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.53-0.69; heterozygote (CT vs. TT): OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.89; dominant model (CC + CT vs. TT): OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80; recessive model (CC vs. CT + TT): OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.81). Further subgroup analyses by ethnicity of participants yielded similar positive results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Present meta-analysis reveals that MTNR1B rs1387153 variant may serve as genetic biomarkers of GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Published data on the association between the MTNR1B rs1387153 polymorphism and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk are controversial.
Objective: A meta-analysis was performed to assess whether the polymorphism of MTNR1B rs1387153 is associated with GDM risk.
Method: Medline, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Biomedicine Databases were searched to identify eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MTNR1B rs1387153 polymorphism and GDM were appropriately derived from fixed-effects or random effects models.
Results: A total of 8 studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled analyses revealed that MTNR1B rs1387153 polymorphism significantly increased the risk of GDM in all models (allele contrast (C vs. T): OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.83; homozygote (CC vs. TT): OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.53-0.69; heterozygote (CT vs. TT): OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.89; dominant model (CC + CT vs. TT): OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80; recessive model (CC vs. CT + TT): OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.81). Further subgroup analyses by ethnicity of participants yielded similar positive results.
Conclusions: Present meta-analysis reveals that MTNR1B rs1387153 variant may serve as genetic biomarkers of GDM.
期刊介绍:
''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.