Sindy Sim , Igor Lima Maldonado , Pierre Castelnau , Laurent Barantin , Wissam El-Hage , Frédéric Andersson , Jean-Philippe Cottier
{"title":"Neural correlates of mindfulness meditation and hypnosis on magnetic resonance imaging: similarities and differences. A scoping review","authors":"Sindy Sim , Igor Lima Maldonado , Pierre Castelnau , Laurent Barantin , Wissam El-Hage , Frédéric Andersson , Jean-Philippe Cottier","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mindfulness meditation (MM) and hypnosis practices are gaining interest in mental health, but their physiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study aimed to synthesize the functional, morphometric and metabolic changes associated with each practice using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to identify their similarities and differences.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>MRI studies investigating MM and hypnosis in mental health, specifically stress, anxiety, and depression, were systematically screened following PRISMA guidelines from four research databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO) between 2010 and 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 97 references met the inclusion criteria (84 for MM and 13 for hypnosis). This review showed common and divergent points regarding the regions involved and associated brain connectivity during MM practice and hypnosis. The primary commonality between mindfulness and hypnosis was decreased default mode network intrinsic activity and increased central executive network - salience network connectivity. Increased connectivity between the default mode network and the salience network was observed in meditative practice and mindfulness predisposition, but not in hypnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While MRI studies provide a better understanding of the neural basis of hypnosis and meditation, this review underscores the need for more rigorous studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S015098612300264X/pdfft?md5=f0bf8af258ecc01a53248912ce3490a8&pid=1-s2.0-S015098612300264X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S015098612300264X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Mindfulness meditation (MM) and hypnosis practices are gaining interest in mental health, but their physiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study aimed to synthesize the functional, morphometric and metabolic changes associated with each practice using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to identify their similarities and differences.
Methods
MRI studies investigating MM and hypnosis in mental health, specifically stress, anxiety, and depression, were systematically screened following PRISMA guidelines from four research databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO) between 2010 and 2022.
Results
In total, 97 references met the inclusion criteria (84 for MM and 13 for hypnosis). This review showed common and divergent points regarding the regions involved and associated brain connectivity during MM practice and hypnosis. The primary commonality between mindfulness and hypnosis was decreased default mode network intrinsic activity and increased central executive network - salience network connectivity. Increased connectivity between the default mode network and the salience network was observed in meditative practice and mindfulness predisposition, but not in hypnosis.
Conclusions
While MRI studies provide a better understanding of the neural basis of hypnosis and meditation, this review underscores the need for more rigorous studies.
背景:正念冥想(MM)和催眠实践正在引起人们对心理健康的兴趣,但它们的生理机制仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在利用磁共振成像(MRI)技术综合每种锻炼方式的功能、形态和代谢变化,并确定其异同点。方法:2010年至2022年期间,根据PRISMA指南,从四个研究数据库(PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO)中系统筛选MM和催眠在心理健康(特别是压力,焦虑和抑郁)中的MRI研究。结果:97篇文献符合纳入标准(MM 84篇,催眠13篇)。这篇综述显示了MM练习和催眠过程中涉及的区域和相关的大脑连接的共同点和不同点。正念和催眠的主要共同点是默认模式网络内在活动减少,中央执行网络-显著性网络连接增加。在冥想练习和正念倾向中观察到默认模式网络和突出网络之间的连通性增加,但在催眠中没有。结论:虽然MRI研究对催眠和冥想的神经基础提供了更好的理解,但这一综述强调了更严格的研究的必要性。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology.
The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.