Sustainable intensification and food security: A panel data assessment of the smallholder maize farmers in Uganda

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100724
Maurice Osewe , Liu Aijun , Han Jiqin
{"title":"Sustainable intensification and food security: A panel data assessment of the smallholder maize farmers in Uganda","authors":"Maurice Osewe ,&nbsp;Liu Aijun ,&nbsp;Han Jiqin","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Food security is touted as an essential condition for social growth. Yet, the </span>food deficit is rampant among </span>smallholder<span><span> farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Besides, farm productivity is considered the theme for improving household food security outcomes. As one of the sub-Saharan African countries, Uganda is affected by food insecurity caused by the declining availability of cropped farmland. Sustainable intensification (SI) is a critical farming practice that enhances crop yield and reduces environmental degradation. However, there is scanty empirical evidence on if farming practices contributing to sustainable intensification can improve the household livelihood and food security. In this research, we used multinomial endogenous treatment effects and a balanced Uganda National Panel Survey to evaluate the impacts of SI technologies on maize farming households' livelihood and food security. We ranked households into four groups depending on the inputs and </span>soil management<span> practices they use on their maize farms, namely “non-adopters”, intensification group”, “sustainable group”, and “sustainable intensification group”. The multinomial endogenous treatment effect (METE) model's findings suggested using the SI cluster is associated with improved food consumption score, household dietary diversity score, and per capita expenditure using non-adopters as the baseline group. Further, these improvements are determined by combining maize-legume intercrop and inorganic fertilizer practices. The results indicate that experts and researchers should espouse multidimensional and all-inclusive technological evaluation methods instead of conservative reductionists methods that concentrate on a solo farming practice at a time. Also, the findings can guide the sustainable vector that highlights and strengthens all-inclusive agricultural growth with policymakers and scientists working with marginalized farmers.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100724"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912423000548","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food security is touted as an essential condition for social growth. Yet, the food deficit is rampant among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Besides, farm productivity is considered the theme for improving household food security outcomes. As one of the sub-Saharan African countries, Uganda is affected by food insecurity caused by the declining availability of cropped farmland. Sustainable intensification (SI) is a critical farming practice that enhances crop yield and reduces environmental degradation. However, there is scanty empirical evidence on if farming practices contributing to sustainable intensification can improve the household livelihood and food security. In this research, we used multinomial endogenous treatment effects and a balanced Uganda National Panel Survey to evaluate the impacts of SI technologies on maize farming households' livelihood and food security. We ranked households into four groups depending on the inputs and soil management practices they use on their maize farms, namely “non-adopters”, intensification group”, “sustainable group”, and “sustainable intensification group”. The multinomial endogenous treatment effect (METE) model's findings suggested using the SI cluster is associated with improved food consumption score, household dietary diversity score, and per capita expenditure using non-adopters as the baseline group. Further, these improvements are determined by combining maize-legume intercrop and inorganic fertilizer practices. The results indicate that experts and researchers should espouse multidimensional and all-inclusive technological evaluation methods instead of conservative reductionists methods that concentrate on a solo farming practice at a time. Also, the findings can guide the sustainable vector that highlights and strengthens all-inclusive agricultural growth with policymakers and scientists working with marginalized farmers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续集约化与粮食安全:乌干达玉米小农的小组数据评估
粮食安全被吹捧为社会发展的必要条件。然而,粮食短缺在撒哈拉以南非洲的小农中十分严重。此外,农业生产力被认为是改善家庭粮食安全成果的主题。作为撒哈拉以南非洲国家之一,乌干达受到耕地减少导致的粮食不安全问题的影响。可持续集约化(SI)是提高作物产量和减少环境退化的关键耕作方法。然而,关于有助于可持续集约化的耕作方式是否能够改善家庭生计和粮食安全的经验证据很少。在这项研究中,我们使用多项内生处理效应和平衡的乌干达国家小组调查来评估SI技术对玉米农户生计和粮食安全的影响。我们根据农户在玉米农场使用的投入物和土壤管理方法将农户分为四组,即“非采用者”、“集约化组”、“可持续组”和“可持续集约化组”。多项内源性治疗效应(METE)模型的研究结果表明,使用SI聚类与改善的食物消费评分、家庭饮食多样性评分和以非收养者为基准组的人均支出有关。此外,这些改进是由玉米-豆科作物间作和无机肥料相结合决定的。研究结果表明,专家和研究人员应采用多维度和全方位的技术评估方法,而不是一次只关注单一农业实践的保守简化方法。此外,研究结果还可以指导政策制定者和科学家与边缘化农民合作,突出和加强包容性农业增长的可持续途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Global Food Security plays a vital role in addressing food security challenges from local to global levels. To secure food systems, it emphasizes multifaceted actions considering technological, biophysical, institutional, economic, social, and political factors. The goal is to foster food systems that meet nutritional needs, preserve the environment, support livelihoods, tackle climate change, and diminish inequalities. This journal serves as a platform for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to access and engage with recent, diverse research and perspectives on achieving sustainable food security globally. It aspires to be an internationally recognized resource presenting cutting-edge insights in an accessible manner to a broad audience.
期刊最新文献
Employment impacts of agrifood system innovations and policies: A review of the evidence Top-down vs bottom-up processes: A systematic review clarifying roles and patterns of interactions in food system transformation Trade-offs for healthy and sustainable diets in Europe: Social-ecological dynamics in an intensive agricultural system Severe food insecurity among middle-aged and older adults in India: Insights from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India Time to transform? Sustainability narratives for European food systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1