Impacts of mobile phone texting on vertical ground reaction forces during stair negotiation

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103522
Xinyao Hu , Yangquan Huang , Qingsong Duan , Ning Jia , Zhanbing Ren , Wenfei Cai , Zhong Zhao , Xingda Qu
{"title":"Impacts of mobile phone texting on vertical ground reaction forces during stair negotiation","authors":"Xinyao Hu ,&nbsp;Yangquan Huang ,&nbsp;Qingsong Duan ,&nbsp;Ning Jia ,&nbsp;Zhanbing Ren ,&nbsp;Wenfei Cai ,&nbsp;Zhong Zhao ,&nbsp;Xingda Qu","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stairs are one of the most dangerous places for accidental falls in both daily life and occupational settings. Knowledge about ground reaction force (GRF) characteristics during stair negotiation can facilitate a better understanding of the causal mechanisms for stair falls. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of mobile phone texting on GRF during stair negotiation and reveal their implications associated with the safety during stair negotiation. Twelve young male adults were involved in an experimental study. They were instructed to carry out texting tasks with different levels of cognitive load while performing stair negotiation. Vertical GRF (vGRF) parameters accounting for force amplitude and loading/unloading rates were compared between texting conditions. Texting tasks resulted in slower force loading and unloading rates during stair ascent, while weight acceptance force during stair descent decreased with the application of texting tasks. These findings suggested that mobile phone texting can compromise postural stability and increase the risk of falls during stair negotiation. The findings from the present study highlight the necessity of avoiding mobile phone usage during stair negation to prevent accidental stair falls. They also have practical implications for developing effective fall prevention interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814123001142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stairs are one of the most dangerous places for accidental falls in both daily life and occupational settings. Knowledge about ground reaction force (GRF) characteristics during stair negotiation can facilitate a better understanding of the causal mechanisms for stair falls. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of mobile phone texting on GRF during stair negotiation and reveal their implications associated with the safety during stair negotiation. Twelve young male adults were involved in an experimental study. They were instructed to carry out texting tasks with different levels of cognitive load while performing stair negotiation. Vertical GRF (vGRF) parameters accounting for force amplitude and loading/unloading rates were compared between texting conditions. Texting tasks resulted in slower force loading and unloading rates during stair ascent, while weight acceptance force during stair descent decreased with the application of texting tasks. These findings suggested that mobile phone texting can compromise postural stability and increase the risk of falls during stair negotiation. The findings from the present study highlight the necessity of avoiding mobile phone usage during stair negation to prevent accidental stair falls. They also have practical implications for developing effective fall prevention interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手机短信对楼梯行走时垂直地面反作用力的影响
楼梯是日常生活和职业环境中最容易发生意外跌倒的地方之一。了解楼梯协商过程中的地面反作用力(GRF)特征有助于更好地理解楼梯坠落的因果机制。本研究旨在探讨手机短信对楼梯协商过程中GRF的影响,并揭示其与楼梯协商过程安全的关系。12名年轻的成年男性参与了一项实验研究。他们被要求在进行楼梯协商的同时进行不同程度认知负荷的发短信任务。比较了不同文本条件下的垂直GRF (vGRF)参数对力幅值和加载/卸载速率的影响。在楼梯上升过程中,发短信任务导致力的加载和卸载速度变慢,而在楼梯下降过程中,重量承受力随着发短信任务的应用而下降。这些发现表明,手机短信会损害姿势的稳定性,并增加在爬楼梯时摔倒的风险。本研究的结果强调了在楼梯否定期间避免使用手机的必要性,以防止意外的楼梯坠落。它们还对制定有效的预防跌倒干预措施具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
期刊最新文献
Seamless switching, feedforward, and feedback mechanisms: Enhancing task performance and user perception in device switch Night work, circadian rhythm, and cognitive performance: A field study with airport security screeners Changes in forklift driving performance and postures among novices resulting from training using a high-fidelity virtual reality simulator: An exploratory study Employees trust, perceived justice, on task performance: Mediating and moderating role of autonomy and organizational culture Pilot workload measurement model based on task complexity analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1