The cognitive effects of computational thinking: A systematic review and meta-analytic study

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2023-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104961
Chiara Montuori , Filippo Gambarota , Gianmarco Altoé , Barbara Arfé
{"title":"The cognitive effects of computational thinking: A systematic review and meta-analytic study","authors":"Chiara Montuori ,&nbsp;Filippo Gambarota ,&nbsp;Gianmarco Altoé ,&nbsp;Barbara Arfé","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we review and meta-analyze the findings of experimental studies published between 2006 and 2022 that examined the effects of coding and programming interventions on children's core and higher order executive functions (response inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning and problem solving). The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address three research questions: 1) Which executive functions are most impacted by the teaching of CT? 2) Which instructional modality (educational robotics/virtual coding/unplugged coding) is most effective in enhancing executive function skills in learners aged 4–16 years? and 3) Does the cognitive effectiveness of coding vary with children's age? A total of 19 studies with 1523 participants met the selection criteria for the systematic review. The meta-analysis included 11 of those studies. The results reveal beneficial effects of structured virtual and tangible coding (educational robotics) activities for preschoolers and first graders, and significant effects of more unstructured virtual coding activities (e.g., Scratch-based) for older students. A multivariate fixed-effects model meta-analysis shows that the teaching of coding significantly improves <em>problem-solving</em> with the highest effect (<em>d</em><sub><em>ppc2</em></sub> = 0.89), but also <em>planning</em> (<em>d</em><sub><em>ppc2</em></sub> = 0.36), and <em>inhibition</em> and <em>working memory</em> with lower effects (<em>d</em><sub><em>ppc2</em></sub> = 0.17, <em>d</em><sub><em>ppc2</em></sub> = 0.20).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131523002385/pdfft?md5=8b96594d5db4b7f70855dddff17db116&pid=1-s2.0-S0360131523002385-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131523002385","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we review and meta-analyze the findings of experimental studies published between 2006 and 2022 that examined the effects of coding and programming interventions on children's core and higher order executive functions (response inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning and problem solving). The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address three research questions: 1) Which executive functions are most impacted by the teaching of CT? 2) Which instructional modality (educational robotics/virtual coding/unplugged coding) is most effective in enhancing executive function skills in learners aged 4–16 years? and 3) Does the cognitive effectiveness of coding vary with children's age? A total of 19 studies with 1523 participants met the selection criteria for the systematic review. The meta-analysis included 11 of those studies. The results reveal beneficial effects of structured virtual and tangible coding (educational robotics) activities for preschoolers and first graders, and significant effects of more unstructured virtual coding activities (e.g., Scratch-based) for older students. A multivariate fixed-effects model meta-analysis shows that the teaching of coding significantly improves problem-solving with the highest effect (dppc2 = 0.89), but also planning (dppc2 = 0.36), and inhibition and working memory with lower effects (dppc2 = 0.17, dppc2 = 0.20).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算思维的认知效应:一项系统回顾和元分析研究
在本文中,我们回顾并分析了2006年至2022年间发表的实验研究结果,这些研究调查了编码和编程干预对儿童核心和高阶执行功能(反应抑制、工作记忆、认知灵活性、计划和问题解决)的影响。系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在解决三个研究问题:1)CT教学对哪些执行功能影响最大?2)哪种教学模式(教育机器人/虚拟编码/不插电编码)在提高4-16岁学习者的执行功能技能方面最有效?3)编码的认知效果是否随儿童年龄的不同而不同?共有19项研究1523名受试者符合系统评价的选择标准。荟萃分析包括其中的11项研究。结果表明,结构化的虚拟和有形编码(教育机器人)活动对学龄前儿童和一年级学生有有益的影响,而更非结构化的虚拟编码活动(例如,基于scratch的)对高年级学生有显著的影响。多变量固定效应模型元分析显示,编码教学显著提高了学生解决问题的能力,效果最高(dppc2 = 0.89),也显著提高了学生的计划能力(dppc2 = 0.36),而抑制能力和工作记忆能力的提高效果较低(dppc2 = 0.17,dppc2 = 0.20)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Investigating co-teaching presence and its impact on student engagement: A mixed-method study on the blended synchronous classroom Exploring interactive behaviours of urban and rural teachers in blended synchronous classrooms: Insights from a proposed interaction analysis framework Conceptualisation of professional digital competence for school leaders in schools with 1:1 coverage of digital devices Editorial Board Using multiple, dynamically linked representations to develop representational competency and conceptual understanding of the earthquake cycle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1