The effect of wearing college apparel on Black men's perceived criminality and perceived risk of being racially profiled by police

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104565
Gabriel Camacho
{"title":"The effect of wearing college apparel on Black men's perceived criminality and perceived risk of being racially profiled by police","authors":"Gabriel Camacho","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current research examines whether a prejudice reduction strategy used by Black college students—signaling a college affiliation—mitigates the perceived risk that a Black man will be seen as a criminal and racially profiled by police. Across four studies, college students of color (study 1: <em>N</em> = 160; study 2: <em>N</em> = 203) and Black and White people (study 3A: <em>N</em> = 205; study 3B: <em>N</em> = 394) perceived a Black man who displayed a college logo on his hoodie as significantly less likely to be seen as a criminal than when he did not. This remained true when the college logo was from a university that was objectively high in prestige (Princeton University; studies 1–2), moderate in prestige (John Jay College; study 2), or had no preexisting prestige (the fictional Pennbrook University; studies 3A and 3B). While college apparel did not consistently reduce the perceived risk that police would racially profile a Black man, an exploratory moderation analysis found that perceiving racial profiling as stemming more from individual than systemic bias lessened this perceived risk for Black but not White participants (study 3B). College apparel also indirectly predicted a lower likelihood of racial profiling through its effect on perceived criminality across all studies. Together, these results suggest that college apparel is believed to mitigate negative stereotypes associated with Black men; however, the perceived likelihood that police will racially profile a Black man is influenced by both his perceived criminality and lay theories of police bias.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103123001221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current research examines whether a prejudice reduction strategy used by Black college students—signaling a college affiliation—mitigates the perceived risk that a Black man will be seen as a criminal and racially profiled by police. Across four studies, college students of color (study 1: N = 160; study 2: N = 203) and Black and White people (study 3A: N = 205; study 3B: N = 394) perceived a Black man who displayed a college logo on his hoodie as significantly less likely to be seen as a criminal than when he did not. This remained true when the college logo was from a university that was objectively high in prestige (Princeton University; studies 1–2), moderate in prestige (John Jay College; study 2), or had no preexisting prestige (the fictional Pennbrook University; studies 3A and 3B). While college apparel did not consistently reduce the perceived risk that police would racially profile a Black man, an exploratory moderation analysis found that perceiving racial profiling as stemming more from individual than systemic bias lessened this perceived risk for Black but not White participants (study 3B). College apparel also indirectly predicted a lower likelihood of racial profiling through its effect on perceived criminality across all studies. Together, these results suggest that college apparel is believed to mitigate negative stereotypes associated with Black men; however, the perceived likelihood that police will racially profile a Black man is influenced by both his perceived criminality and lay theories of police bias.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
穿着大学服装对黑人男性感知犯罪和感知被警察种族定性风险的影响
目前的研究考察了黑人大学生使用的减少偏见的策略——表明自己的大学背景——是否会降低黑人被警察视为罪犯和种族歧视的风险。在四项研究中,有色人种大学生(研究1:N = 160;研究2:N = 203)和黑人和白人(研究3A: N = 205;研究3B: N = 394)认为在连帽衫上印有大学标志的黑人男子被视为罪犯的可能性明显低于没有印有大学标志的黑人男子。当学院标志来自客观上声望很高的大学(普林斯顿大学;学业1-2),声望中等(约翰·杰伊学院;研究2),或者没有预先存在的声望(虚构的宾夕法尼亚布鲁克大学;研究3A和3B)。虽然大学服装并不能始终降低警察对黑人进行种族定性的感知风险,但一项探索性的适度分析发现,认为种族定性更多地源于个人偏见,而不是系统性偏见,会降低黑人参与者的这种感知风险,而白人参与者则不会(研究3B)。在所有研究中,大学服装对感知犯罪的影响也间接预测了种族定性的可能性较低。总之,这些结果表明,大学服装被认为可以减轻与黑人男性有关的负面刻板印象;然而,警察对黑人进行种族定性的可能性既受到他的犯罪认知影响,也受到警察偏见理论的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
期刊最新文献
Brilliance as gender deviance: Gender-role incongruity as another barrier to women's success in academic fields The impact of social identity complexity on intergroup parochial and universal cooperation under different payoff structures and frames Bless her heart: Gossip phrased with concern provides advantages in female intrasexual competition Editorial Board Revisiting the moral forecasting error – A preregistered replication and extension of “Are we more moral than we think?”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1