Percutaneous ethanol injection in thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies: A systematic review, meta-analysis and economic evaluation

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrinologia Diabetes Y Nutricion Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.endien.2023.08.007
Beatriz León-Salas , Aránzazu Hernández-Yumar , Diego Infante-Ventura , Aythami de Armas Castellano , Yadira González Hernández , Renata Linertová , Teresa Téllez Santana , Pedro de Pablos-Velasco , María M. Trujillo-Martín
{"title":"Percutaneous ethanol injection in thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies: A systematic review, meta-analysis and economic evaluation","authors":"Beatriz León-Salas ,&nbsp;Aránzazu Hernández-Yumar ,&nbsp;Diego Infante-Ventura ,&nbsp;Aythami de Armas Castellano ,&nbsp;Yadira González Hernández ,&nbsp;Renata Linertová ,&nbsp;Teresa Téllez Santana ,&nbsp;Pedro de Pablos-Velasco ,&nbsp;María M. Trujillo-Martín","doi":"10.1016/j.endien.2023.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) has been shown to be a valuable treatment for thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of PEI in thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review (SR) using meta-analysis was conducted on the effectiveness and safety of PEI. A SR on cost-effectiveness was also performed. The SRs were conducted according to the methodology developed by the Cochrane Collaboration with reporting in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A cost-minimization analysis was carried out using a decision tree model. Assuming equal effectiveness between two minimally invasive techniques (PEI and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)), the model compared the costs of the alternatives with a horizon of six months and from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search identified three RCTs (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->157) that evaluated PEI versus RFA in patients diagnosed with benign thyroid nodules: ninety-six patients with predominantly cystic nodules and sixty-one patients with solid nodules. No evidence was found on other techniques or thyroid nodular pathology. No statistically significant differences were observed between PEI and RFA in volume reduction (%), symptom score, cosmetic score, therapeutic success and major complications. No economic evaluations were identified. The cost-minimization analysis estimated the cost per patient of the PEI procedure at €326 compared to €4781 for RFA, which means an incremental difference of −€4455.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are no differences between PEI and RFA regarding their safety and effectiveness, but the economic evaluation determined that the former option is cheaper.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48650,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinologia Diabetes Y Nutricion","volume":"70 9","pages":"Pages 572-583"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinologia Diabetes Y Nutricion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530018023001580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) has been shown to be a valuable treatment for thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of PEI in thyroid nodular pathology and metastatic cervical adenopathies.

Methods

A systematic review (SR) using meta-analysis was conducted on the effectiveness and safety of PEI. A SR on cost-effectiveness was also performed. The SRs were conducted according to the methodology developed by the Cochrane Collaboration with reporting in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A cost-minimization analysis was carried out using a decision tree model. Assuming equal effectiveness between two minimally invasive techniques (PEI and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)), the model compared the costs of the alternatives with a horizon of six months and from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.

Results

The search identified three RCTs (n = 157) that evaluated PEI versus RFA in patients diagnosed with benign thyroid nodules: ninety-six patients with predominantly cystic nodules and sixty-one patients with solid nodules. No evidence was found on other techniques or thyroid nodular pathology. No statistically significant differences were observed between PEI and RFA in volume reduction (%), symptom score, cosmetic score, therapeutic success and major complications. No economic evaluations were identified. The cost-minimization analysis estimated the cost per patient of the PEI procedure at €326 compared to €4781 for RFA, which means an incremental difference of −€4455.

Conclusions

There are no differences between PEI and RFA regarding their safety and effectiveness, but the economic evaluation determined that the former option is cheaper.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮乙醇注射治疗甲状腺结节病理和转移性宫颈腺病:系统回顾、荟萃分析和经济评价。
背景:经皮乙醇注射(PEI)已被证明是甲状腺结节病理和转移性宫颈腺病的一种有价值的治疗方法。目的:评价PEI在甲状腺结节性病理和转移性宫颈腺病中的有效性、安全性和成本效益。方法:采用meta分析对PEI的有效性和安全性进行系统评价。还对成本效益进行了评估。SRs按照Cochrane协作组制定的方法进行,并按照PRISMA声明进行报告。采用决策树模型进行了成本最小化分析。假设两种微创技术(PEI和射频消融(RFA))的效果相同,该模型从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度比较了六个月的替代方案的成本。结果:本研究确定了3项随机对照试验(n=157),评估了PEI与RFA在诊断为良性甲状腺结节患者中的作用:96例主要为囊性结节,61例为实性结节。其他技术或甲状腺结节病理未发现证据。PEI和RFA在体积缩小(%)、症状评分、美容评分、治疗成功率和主要并发症方面均无统计学差异。没有确定经济评价。成本最小化分析估计PEI手术的每位患者成本为326欧元,而RFA为4781欧元,这意味着增量差异为- 4455欧元。结论:PEI和RFA在安全性和有效性方面没有差异,但经济评估确定前者更便宜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición is the official journal of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Diabetes (Sociedad Española de Diabetes, SED), and was founded in 1954. The aim of the journal is to improve knowledge and be a useful tool in practice for clinical and laboratory specialists, trainee physicians, researchers, and nurses interested in endocrinology, diabetes, nutrition and related disciplines. It is an international journal published in Spanish (print and online) and English (online), covering different fields of endocrinology and metabolism, including diabetes, obesity, and nutrition disorders, as well as the most relevant research produced mainly in Spanish language territories. The quality of the contents is ensured by a prestigious national and international board, and by a selected panel of specialists involved in a rigorous peer review. The result is that only manuscripts containing high quality research and with utmost interest for clinicians and professionals related in the field are published. The Journal publishes Original clinical and research articles, Reviews, Special articles, Clinical Guidelines, Position Statements from both societies and Letters to the editor. Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición can be found at Science Citation Index Expanded, Medline/PubMed and SCOPUS.
期刊最新文献
Are we underdiagnosing cognitive impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus? Automated insulin delivery systems in the treatment of diabetes: Benefits, challenges, and practical considerations in pediatric patients Phase angle: Differences between disease-related malnutrition, obesity and healthy people Thyroid and assisted reproduction Distortion of body image perception in the Prader-Willi syndrome: Relationship with the perceptual reasoning index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1