Air pollution accountability research: Moving from a chain to a web

S. Ebelt , L. Baxter , H.S. Erickson , L.R.F. Henneman , S. Lange , T.J. Luben , M. Neidell , A.M. Rule , A.G. Russell , J. Wendt Hess , C.J. Burns , J.S. LaKind , J.E. Goodman
{"title":"Air pollution accountability research: Moving from a chain to a web","authors":"S. Ebelt ,&nbsp;L. Baxter ,&nbsp;H.S. Erickson ,&nbsp;L.R.F. Henneman ,&nbsp;S. Lange ,&nbsp;T.J. Luben ,&nbsp;M. Neidell ,&nbsp;A.M. Rule ,&nbsp;A.G. Russell ,&nbsp;J. Wendt Hess ,&nbsp;C.J. Burns ,&nbsp;J.S. LaKind ,&nbsp;J.E. Goodman","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Air pollution accountability studies examine the relationship(s) between an intervention, regulation, or event and the resulting downstream impacts, if any, on emissions, exposure, and/or health. The sequence of events has been schematically described as an accountability chain. Here, we update the existing framework to capture real-life complexities and to highlight important factors that fall outside the linear chain. This new “accountability web” is intended to convey the intricacies associated with conducting an accountability study to various audiences, including researchers, policy makers, and stakeholders. We also identify data considerations for planning and completing a robust accountability study, including those relevant to novel and innovative air pollution and exposure data. Finally, we present a series of recommendations for the accountability research community that can serve as a guide for the next generation of accountability studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113323000317/pdfft?md5=2f3f1441171ff86f5c6136a4c87b5d0b&pid=1-s2.0-S2590113323000317-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113323000317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air pollution accountability studies examine the relationship(s) between an intervention, regulation, or event and the resulting downstream impacts, if any, on emissions, exposure, and/or health. The sequence of events has been schematically described as an accountability chain. Here, we update the existing framework to capture real-life complexities and to highlight important factors that fall outside the linear chain. This new “accountability web” is intended to convey the intricacies associated with conducting an accountability study to various audiences, including researchers, policy makers, and stakeholders. We also identify data considerations for planning and completing a robust accountability study, including those relevant to novel and innovative air pollution and exposure data. Finally, we present a series of recommendations for the accountability research community that can serve as a guide for the next generation of accountability studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空气污染责任研究:从链条到网络
空气污染问责研究检查干预、监管或事件与由此产生的下游影响之间的关系,如果有的话,对排放、暴露和/或健康的影响。事件的顺序已被简略地描述为责任链。在这里,我们更新了现有的框架,以捕捉现实生活中的复杂性,并突出了线性链之外的重要因素。这个新的“问责网络”旨在向包括研究人员、政策制定者和利益相关者在内的各种受众传达与进行问责研究相关的复杂性。我们还确定了规划和完成强有力的问责研究的数据考虑因素,包括与新颖和创新的空气污染和暴露数据相关的数据。最后,我们为问责研究界提出了一系列建议,可以作为下一代问责研究的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Epidemiology
Global Epidemiology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
39 days
期刊最新文献
Academic performance and associated factors among female university students Exploring diseases burden in HIV population: Results from the CHAO (Comorbidities in HIV/AIDS outpatients) cross-sectional study in Kenya What constitutes valid evidence of causation? Gas stoves and childhood asthma revisited Letter to the editor regarding: “Challenging unverified assumptions in causal claims: Do gas stoves increase risk of pediatric asthma?” Identification of population multimorbidity patterns in 3.9 million patients from Bogota in 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1