Effect Sizes for Changes in Health and Well-Being Following Treatment With the One-To-Zero Technique in Individuals With Occipito-Atlantal Joint Dysfunction: A Repeated Measures Study

Ushani Ambalavanar MHSc , Victoria Berkers BHSc , Heidi Haavik PhD, DC , Bernadette Ann Murphy PhD, DC
{"title":"Effect Sizes for Changes in Health and Well-Being Following Treatment With the One-To-Zero Technique in Individuals With Occipito-Atlantal Joint Dysfunction: A Repeated Measures Study","authors":"Ushani Ambalavanar MHSc ,&nbsp;Victoria Berkers BHSc ,&nbsp;Heidi Haavik PhD, DC ,&nbsp;Bernadette Ann Murphy PhD, DC","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2023.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to determine effect sizes (ES) for changes in self-reported measures of musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction resulting from the one-to-zero method using a repeated measures study design.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Twenty participants presenting with articular dysfunction of the occipito-atlantal (C0-C1) complex were treated using the one-to-zero method, a high-velocity low-amplitude thrust administered between the C0-C1 complex before treating other restrictive segments in a cephalocaudal direction. The participants completed online questionnaires using Google Forms that assessed aspects of the biopsychosocial model<span><span> of pain at baseline and within a week after treatment. The questionnaires included the following: (1) Demographic and Health Behavior Survey; (2) Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) or </span>Neck Disability Index<span> (NDI); (3) Beck Anxiety Index (BAI); (4) Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); and (5) 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Paired </span></span></span><em>t</em><span> test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test was performed, dependent on normality. Cohen's </span><em>d</em> values were calculated for each questionnaire score (0.20 indicative of small; ≥0.50 medium; and ≥0.80 large ES).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The NDI, NBQ, BAI, and ISI had a large ES (all <em>d</em> ≥ 0.80). In the SF-36, 4 subscales had a small to near-medium ES, 1 subscale had a medium to near-large ES, and the remaining 2 had a large ES (<em>d</em> ≥ 0.80). The physical and mental component summary had a large (<em>d</em> = 0.88) and small ES (<em>d</em> = 0.35), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The effect sizes suggest the one-to-zero treatment induces change in various aspects of the biopsychosocial model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370723000627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to determine effect sizes (ES) for changes in self-reported measures of musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction resulting from the one-to-zero method using a repeated measures study design.

Methods

Twenty participants presenting with articular dysfunction of the occipito-atlantal (C0-C1) complex were treated using the one-to-zero method, a high-velocity low-amplitude thrust administered between the C0-C1 complex before treating other restrictive segments in a cephalocaudal direction. The participants completed online questionnaires using Google Forms that assessed aspects of the biopsychosocial model of pain at baseline and within a week after treatment. The questionnaires included the following: (1) Demographic and Health Behavior Survey; (2) Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) or Neck Disability Index (NDI); (3) Beck Anxiety Index (BAI); (4) Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); and (5) 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Paired t test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test was performed, dependent on normality. Cohen's d values were calculated for each questionnaire score (0.20 indicative of small; ≥0.50 medium; and ≥0.80 large ES).

Results

The NDI, NBQ, BAI, and ISI had a large ES (all d ≥ 0.80). In the SF-36, 4 subscales had a small to near-medium ES, 1 subscale had a medium to near-large ES, and the remaining 2 had a large ES (d ≥ 0.80). The physical and mental component summary had a large (d = 0.88) and small ES (d = 0.35), respectively.

Conclusion

The effect sizes suggest the one-to-zero treatment induces change in various aspects of the biopsychosocial model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
枕寰关节功能障碍患者使用一对零技术治疗后健康和幸福感变化的效应量:一项重复测量研究
目的本研究的目的是通过重复测量研究设计,确定由一对零方法引起的肌肉骨骼疼痛和功能障碍自我报告测量变化的效应量(ES)。方法20例出现枕-寰椎(C0-C1)复合物关节功能障碍的患者采用一对零的方法进行治疗,即在C0-C1复合物之间进行高速低幅度的推力,然后在头-掌侧方向治疗其他限制性节段。参与者使用谷歌表格完成在线调查问卷,评估基线和治疗后一周内疼痛的生物心理社会模型的各个方面。问卷内容包括:(1)人口与健康行为调查;(2)颈部伯恩茅斯问卷(NBQ)或颈部残疾指数(NDI);(3)贝克焦虑指数(BAI);(4)失眠严重程度指数(ISI);(5) 36项健康调查表(SF-36)。根据正态性进行配对t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验。计算每个问卷得分的科恩d值(0.20表示小;≥0.50介质;≥0.80大ES)。结果NDI、NBQ、BAI、ISI具有较大的ES(均d≥0.80)。在SF-36中,4个分量表的ES值为小到接近中等,1个分量表的ES值为中到接近大,其余2个分量表的ES值为大(d≥0.80)。生理和心理成分总结ES较大(d = 0.88),ES较小(d = 0.35)。结论1比0的治疗诱导了生物心理社会模型各方面的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pain-Related Anxiety and Abdominal Muscle Thickness during Standing Postural Tasks in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Analgesic Self-medication Among Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in a South African Chiropractic Teaching Clinic: A Cross-sectional Study Development of a Headache Diary and Assessment of Tension-Type Headache Diagnostic Criteria and Oral Behaviors, Joint Range of Motion, and Tenderness to Palpation: An Observational Study Editorial board Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1