Neurological outcomes after gamma knife radiosurgery for symptomatic skull base meningiomas based on their locations: Single institution experience

Farid Kazemi , Alireza Tabibkhooei , Mobin Naghshbandi , Vahid Ghorbani kalkhaje , Parisa Javadnia
{"title":"Neurological outcomes after gamma knife radiosurgery for symptomatic skull base meningiomas based on their locations: Single institution experience","authors":"Farid Kazemi ,&nbsp;Alireza Tabibkhooei ,&nbsp;Mobin Naghshbandi ,&nbsp;Vahid Ghorbani kalkhaje ,&nbsp;Parisa Javadnia","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2023.101899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Gross total resection of skull base meningioma is so challenging due to its relevant high morbidity. Gamma knife radiosurgery is concerned by providing a favorable therapeutic option in the management of SBM. This study aims to evaluate the neurological outcome after GKRS as an adjuvant or primary treatment for SBM according to their locations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cross-sectional study consisted of 108 patients with SBM who underwent GKRS as an adjuvant or primary treatment. We found 40 patients with cavernous sinus meningioma (CSM), 36 patients with petroclival meningioma (PCM), and 22 patients with cerebellopontine angle meningioma (CPM). 81.1% of whom were female (n = 90) with a median age of 52.68 years. The mean tumor volume was 4.5 cm3 and the mean marginal dose was 13 Gy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Tumor control was achieved in 96.4 % of patients at a median follow-up of 38.4 months. Over all 17 of 108 patients (15.6%) report improvement in their neurological symptoms. Patients with CPM demonstrated lower rates of neurological symptoms improvement compared to patients with PCM and CSM. Deterioration of neurological symptoms after GKRS developed in 11 patients (10.1%) which was more reported by patients with CSM than the others. The most improvement in cranial nerve deficit was in CN Ⅵ, Ⅴ, VIII among patients with CSM, PCM, and CPM respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>GKRS is acceptable as a primary or adjuvant treatment for SBM by providing an appreciable rate of improvement in neurological symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 101899"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923001822/pdfft?md5=9d2d1f68c88555609e9010444e991796&pid=1-s2.0-S2214751923001822-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923001822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Gross total resection of skull base meningioma is so challenging due to its relevant high morbidity. Gamma knife radiosurgery is concerned by providing a favorable therapeutic option in the management of SBM. This study aims to evaluate the neurological outcome after GKRS as an adjuvant or primary treatment for SBM according to their locations.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study consisted of 108 patients with SBM who underwent GKRS as an adjuvant or primary treatment. We found 40 patients with cavernous sinus meningioma (CSM), 36 patients with petroclival meningioma (PCM), and 22 patients with cerebellopontine angle meningioma (CPM). 81.1% of whom were female (n = 90) with a median age of 52.68 years. The mean tumor volume was 4.5 cm3 and the mean marginal dose was 13 Gy.

Results

Tumor control was achieved in 96.4 % of patients at a median follow-up of 38.4 months. Over all 17 of 108 patients (15.6%) report improvement in their neurological symptoms. Patients with CPM demonstrated lower rates of neurological symptoms improvement compared to patients with PCM and CSM. Deterioration of neurological symptoms after GKRS developed in 11 patients (10.1%) which was more reported by patients with CSM than the others. The most improvement in cranial nerve deficit was in CN Ⅵ, Ⅴ, VIII among patients with CSM, PCM, and CPM respectively.

Conclusion

GKRS is acceptable as a primary or adjuvant treatment for SBM by providing an appreciable rate of improvement in neurological symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于症状性颅底脑膜瘤位置的伽玛刀放射治疗后的神经学预后:单一机构经验
背景与目的颅底脑膜瘤因其高发病率而极具挑战性。伽玛刀放射外科治疗为SBM的治疗提供了一个有利的选择。本研究旨在评估GKRS作为SBM的辅助治疗或主要治疗后的神经系统预后。方法本回顾性横断面研究包括108例SBM患者,他们接受GKRS作为辅助或主要治疗。我们发现海绵窦脑膜瘤(CSM) 40例,岩斜坡脑膜瘤(PCM) 36例,桥小脑角脑膜瘤(CPM) 22例。其中女性占81.1% (n = 90),中位年龄52.68岁。平均肿瘤体积为4.5 cm3,平均边际剂量为13 Gy。结果96.4%的患者在38.4个月的中位随访中获得肿瘤控制。108例患者中有17例(15.6%)报告其神经症状有所改善。与PCM和CSM患者相比,CPM患者表现出较低的神经症状改善率。11例患者(10.1%)出现GKRS后神经系统症状恶化,其中CSM患者的报告多于其他患者。在CSM、PCM和CPM患者中,脑神经缺损改善最大的分别是CNⅥ、Ⅴ、VIII。结论krs可作为SBM的主要或辅助治疗,可显著改善神经系统症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Restorative neurostimulation for chronic low back pain using ReActiv8® in a patient with a large lumbar disc herniation Topical dexamethason effectiveness combined with surgical intervention in patients suffering from chronic subdural hematoma Cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cyst presenting with only trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective study at the single-center in Vietnam Teta injury at the craniovertebral junction: A case report Clinical characteristics and management of vertebral artery dissection without definitive imaging features: A single center cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1