Wind power expansion and regional allocative efficiency among fossil-fuel electricity generators

IF 1.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS International Journal of Industrial Organization Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.103035
Yin Chu , Juanxia Gao , Haoyang Li
{"title":"Wind power expansion and regional allocative efficiency among fossil-fuel electricity generators","authors":"Yin Chu ,&nbsp;Juanxia Gao ,&nbsp;Haoyang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.103035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Integrating wind power demands more generation fleet flexibility and incurs more incidences of transmission congestion, which may impose a negative effect on how efficiently regional production is allocated among fossil fuel electricity generators (we call it “regional allocative efficiency”). Exploring exogenous variations in wind power generation conditional on wind turbine capacity, we analyze wind-induced allocative efficiency loss by comparing the average cost sensitivity of fossil-fuel generator utilization between periods of different wind generation levels in a US regional electricity market. Results show that the utilization of fossil fuel generators becomes less sensitive to their costs as the share of wind power increases. This effect is more pronounced when wind power is more volatile and when transmission capacity is less sufficient. The back-of-envelope calculation based on our empirical findings suggests that the private inefficiency cost is nontrivial: taking it into account would increase the levelized cost of wind energy by $12/MWh, amounting to approximately 17% of the traditional estimates. Further incorporating the social damage of carbon dioxide in the calculation implies that the privately inefficient substitution from cheap coal to expensive gas units instead brings a net social benefit; nonetheless, our estimated private cost is still policy-relevant since it is a local burden while the carbon abatement benefit is shared globally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48127,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Organization","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 103035"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167718723001042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating wind power demands more generation fleet flexibility and incurs more incidences of transmission congestion, which may impose a negative effect on how efficiently regional production is allocated among fossil fuel electricity generators (we call it “regional allocative efficiency”). Exploring exogenous variations in wind power generation conditional on wind turbine capacity, we analyze wind-induced allocative efficiency loss by comparing the average cost sensitivity of fossil-fuel generator utilization between periods of different wind generation levels in a US regional electricity market. Results show that the utilization of fossil fuel generators becomes less sensitive to their costs as the share of wind power increases. This effect is more pronounced when wind power is more volatile and when transmission capacity is less sufficient. The back-of-envelope calculation based on our empirical findings suggests that the private inefficiency cost is nontrivial: taking it into account would increase the levelized cost of wind energy by $12/MWh, amounting to approximately 17% of the traditional estimates. Further incorporating the social damage of carbon dioxide in the calculation implies that the privately inefficient substitution from cheap coal to expensive gas units instead brings a net social benefit; nonetheless, our estimated private cost is still policy-relevant since it is a local burden while the carbon abatement benefit is shared globally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风电扩张与化石燃料发电机组的区域配置效率
整合风力发电需要更大的发电机队灵活性,并导致更多的输电拥堵,这可能会对区域生产在化石燃料发电机组之间的分配效率产生负面影响(我们称之为“区域分配效率”)。通过比较美国区域电力市场中不同风力发电水平期间化石燃料发电机利用的平均成本敏感性,研究风力发电在风力发电容量条件下的外生变化,分析风力引起的分配效率损失。结果表明,随着风力发电份额的增加,化石燃料发电机的利用对其成本的敏感性降低。这种影响在风力发电不稳定和输电能力不足时更为明显。根据我们的实证研究结果进行的粗略计算表明,私人的无效率成本是非微不足道的:考虑到这一点,风能的平准化成本将增加12美元/兆瓦时,约为传统估算的17%。进一步将二氧化碳的社会损害纳入计算意味着,从廉价煤炭到昂贵天然气的私人低效替代反而带来了净社会效益;尽管如此,我们估计的私人成本仍然与政策相关,因为它是地方负担,而碳减排效益是全球共享的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The IJIO is an international venture that aims at full coverage of theoretical and empirical questions in industrial organization. This includes classic questions of strategic behavior and market structure. The journal also seeks to publish articles dealing with technological change, internal organization of firms, regulation, antitrust and productivity analysis. We recognize the need to allow for diversity of perspectives and research styles in industrial organization and we encourage submissions in theoretical work, empirical work, and case studies. The journal will also occasionally publish symposia on topical issues.
期刊最新文献
A model of mobile app and ad platform markets Post and hold regulation and competitive conduct: Evidence from the U.S. beer industry VAT pass-through and competition: Evidence from the Greek islands The effects of removing gender-based price discrimination on movie demand: Estimates using smartphone location data Why do some new products fail? Evidence from the entry and exit of Vanilla Coke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1