Lorenzo A. Miller , Rudolf K. Braun , Regina J. Golding , Michael Lasarev , Allison C. Rodgers , Sarah El-Meanawy , Timothy A. Hacker , Marlowe W. Eldridge , Awni M. Al-Subu
{"title":"Indirect cardiac output assessment in a swine pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome model","authors":"Lorenzo A. Miller , Rudolf K. Braun , Regina J. Golding , Michael Lasarev , Allison C. Rodgers , Sarah El-Meanawy , Timothy A. Hacker , Marlowe W. Eldridge , Awni M. Al-Subu","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2023.104199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the correlation between volume of carbon dioxide elimination (V̇CO<sub>2</sub>) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO<sub>2</sub><span><span>) with cardiac output (CO) in a swine pediatric </span>acute respiratory distress syndrome </span><strong>(</strong>ARDS) model.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Respiratory and hemodynamic variables were collected from twenty-six mechanically ventilated juvenile pigs under </span>general anesthesia before and after inducing ARDS, using </span>oleic acid infusion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Prior to ARDS induction, mean (SD) CO, V̇CO<sub>2</sub>, PETCO<sub>2</sub><span>, and dead space to tidal volume ratio (V</span><sub>d</sub>/V<sub>t</sub>) were 4.16 (1.10) L/min, 103.69 (18.06) ml/min, 40.72 (3.88) mmHg and 0.25 (0.09) respectively. Partial correlation coefficients between average CO, V̇CO<sub>2</sub>, and PETCO<sub>2</sub> were 0.44 (95% confidence interval: 0.18–0.69) and 0.50 (0.18–0.74), respectively. After ARDS induction, mean CO, V̇CO<sub>2</sub>, PETCO<sub>2</sub>, and V<sub>d</sub>/V<sub>t</sub> were 3.33 (0.97) L/min, 113.71 (22.97) ml/min, 50.17 (9.73) mmHg and 0.40 (0.08). Partial correlations between CO and V̇CO<sub>2</sub> was 0.01 (−0.31 to 0.37) and between CO and PETCO<sub>2</sub> was 0.35 (−0.002 to 0.65).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ARDS may limit the utility of volumetric capnography to monitor CO.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 104199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904823001878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the correlation between volume of carbon dioxide elimination (V̇CO2) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) with cardiac output (CO) in a swine pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) model.
Methods
Respiratory and hemodynamic variables were collected from twenty-six mechanically ventilated juvenile pigs under general anesthesia before and after inducing ARDS, using oleic acid infusion.
Results
Prior to ARDS induction, mean (SD) CO, V̇CO2, PETCO2, and dead space to tidal volume ratio (Vd/Vt) were 4.16 (1.10) L/min, 103.69 (18.06) ml/min, 40.72 (3.88) mmHg and 0.25 (0.09) respectively. Partial correlation coefficients between average CO, V̇CO2, and PETCO2 were 0.44 (95% confidence interval: 0.18–0.69) and 0.50 (0.18–0.74), respectively. After ARDS induction, mean CO, V̇CO2, PETCO2, and Vd/Vt were 3.33 (0.97) L/min, 113.71 (22.97) ml/min, 50.17 (9.73) mmHg and 0.40 (0.08). Partial correlations between CO and V̇CO2 was 0.01 (−0.31 to 0.37) and between CO and PETCO2 was 0.35 (−0.002 to 0.65).
Conclusion
ARDS may limit the utility of volumetric capnography to monitor CO.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense.
Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as:
-Mechanics of breathing-
Gas exchange and acid-base balance-
Respiration at rest and exercise-
Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen-
Embryonic and adult respiration-
Comparative respiratory physiology.
Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.