Expansion and Experimental Evaluation of Scaling Relations for the Prediction of Wheel Performance in Reduced Gravity

Abstract

Traversing granular regolith, especially in reduced gravity environments, remains a potential challenge for wheeled rovers. Mitigating hazards for planetary exploration rovers requires testing in representative environments, but direct Earth-based testing fails to account for the effect of reduced gravity on the soil itself. Granular scaling laws (GSL) have been proposed in the literature to predict performance of a larger wheel based on tests with a smaller wheel, or to predict performance in one gravity level based on tests in another gravity level. However, this is the first work to experimentally validate GSL in reduced gravity. Here, an expanded version of existing GSL was evaluated experimentally by measuring performance of a single wheel driving through cohesionless lunar soil simulant GRC-1 aboard parabolic flights that reproduce the effects of lunar gravity, and comparing those results to scaled tests performed on the ground. This scaled-wheel testing achieved less than 10% prediction error on three measured output metrics: drawbar pull (i.e. net traction), sinkage, and power draw. Predictions also erred on the conservative side. Subsurface soil imaging revealed similar soil behavior between scaled tests. GSL thus offers an accurate and conservative method for predicting wheel performance in reduced gravity based on 1-g experiments, at least in cohesionless soil.