Clinical assessment, treatment, and referral trends for adolescent runners seeking care at an injured runners' clinic.

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-18 DOI:10.3233/PRM-220082
Alexandra F DeJong Lempke, Andrea Stracciolini, Sarah B Willwerth, Kathryn E Ackerman, Pierre A d'Hemecourt, William P Meehan, Kristin E Whitney
{"title":"Clinical assessment, treatment, and referral trends for adolescent runners seeking care at an injured runners' clinic.","authors":"Alexandra F DeJong Lempke, Andrea Stracciolini, Sarah B Willwerth, Kathryn E Ackerman, Pierre A d'Hemecourt, William P Meehan, Kristin E Whitney","doi":"10.3233/PRM-220082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Over a 10-year time frame, this study aimed to evaluate diagnosis, treatment, and referral trends for adolescent runners seeking care for running-related injuries (RRIs) at a clinic that specializes in running medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective chart review of 392 adolescent runners (2,326 encounters) who sought care for RRIs between the years 2011 and 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical assessments, referrals, assistive devices, and medications prescribed or administered overall and by injury type. Chi-square analyses were used to compare proportions of services rendered across the 10-year time frame.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients most frequently received manual evaluations or special tests during clinic visits. Most visits resulted in at least one referral (91%), primarily for physical therapy or gait-training. Assistive devices and medications/supplements were offered at only 18% of patient visits. The majority of assessments (X2 = 69.7, p = 0.002), treatments (X2: 23.6-43.8, p: <  0.001-0.003), and referrals (X2 = 132, p <  0.001) were for shin injuries. Larger proportions of nutrition assessments (X2 = 40.7, p <  0.001), interventions (X2 = 26.8, p = 0.003), and referrals (X2 = 27.5, p = 0.002) were performed in or after the year 2015.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinic visits for shin injuries required the most clinical resources per episode of care. There were observed shifts in clinical assessment and treatment approaches to include more expanded nutritional and physiologic considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-220082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Over a 10-year time frame, this study aimed to evaluate diagnosis, treatment, and referral trends for adolescent runners seeking care for running-related injuries (RRIs) at a clinic that specializes in running medicine.

Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of 392 adolescent runners (2,326 encounters) who sought care for RRIs between the years 2011 and 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical assessments, referrals, assistive devices, and medications prescribed or administered overall and by injury type. Chi-square analyses were used to compare proportions of services rendered across the 10-year time frame.

Results: Patients most frequently received manual evaluations or special tests during clinic visits. Most visits resulted in at least one referral (91%), primarily for physical therapy or gait-training. Assistive devices and medications/supplements were offered at only 18% of patient visits. The majority of assessments (X2 = 69.7, p = 0.002), treatments (X2: 23.6-43.8, p: <  0.001-0.003), and referrals (X2 = 132, p <  0.001) were for shin injuries. Larger proportions of nutrition assessments (X2 = 40.7, p <  0.001), interventions (X2 = 26.8, p = 0.003), and referrals (X2 = 27.5, p = 0.002) were performed in or after the year 2015.

Conclusion: Clinic visits for shin injuries required the most clinical resources per episode of care. There were observed shifts in clinical assessment and treatment approaches to include more expanded nutritional and physiologic considerations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在受伤的跑步者诊所寻求护理的青少年跑步者的临床评估、治疗和转诊趋势。
目的:在10年的时间框架内,本研究旨在评估青少年跑步者在一家专门从事跑步医学的诊所寻求跑步相关损伤(RRIs)护理的诊断、治疗和转诊趋势。方法:本研究是对2011年至2021年间寻求RRIs治疗的392名青少年跑步者(2326次接触)的回顾性图表回顾。描述性统计用于总结临床评估、转诊、辅助装置、处方或管理的药物总体和损伤类型。卡方分析用于比较10年时间框架内提供的服务的比例。结果:患者在门诊就诊时最常接受人工评估或特殊检查。大多数就诊至少有一次转诊(91%),主要是物理治疗或步态训练。只有18%的患者就诊时提供了辅助设备和药物/补充剂。大多数评估(X2 = 69.7, p = 0.002)、治疗(X2: 23.6-43.8, p: < 0.001-0.003)和转诊(X2 = 132, p < 0.001)以胫骨损伤为主。更大比例的营养评估(X2 = 40.7, p < 0.001)、干预(X2 = 26.8, p = 0.003)和转诊(X2 = 27.5, p = 0.002)在2015年或之后进行。结论:胫骨损伤的临床就诊需要最多的临床资源。观察到临床评估和治疗方法的转变,包括更多的营养和生理方面的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
139
期刊最新文献
Caregiver and student perspectives on school services for students with traumatic brain injury during the COVID-19 pandemic. Review of Appetite for Risk-What it is, Who has it and How I survived, by Robert R. Abbott. Analysis of a newly developed multidisciplinary program in the Middle East informed by the recently revised spina bifida guidelines. Effectiveness of virtual reality training compared to balance-specific training and conventional training on balance and gross motor functions of children with cerebral palsy: A double blinded randomized controlled trial. "Virtual reality fixed me": A case report of the use of virtual reality during intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1