Accuracy, Usability, and Adherence of Smartwatches for Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Older Adults After Stroke: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q2 Medicine JMIR Cardio Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.2196/45137
Eric Y Ding, Khanh-Van Tran, Darleen Lessard, Ziyue Wang, Dong Han, Fahimeh Mohagheghian, Edith Mensah Otabil, Kamran Noorishirazi, Jordy Mehawej, Andreas Filippaios, Syed Naeem, Matthew F Gottbrecht, Timothy P Fitzgibbons, Jane S Saczynski, Bruce Barton, Ki Chon, David D McManus
{"title":"Accuracy, Usability, and Adherence of Smartwatches for Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Older Adults After Stroke: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Eric Y Ding, Khanh-Van Tran, Darleen Lessard, Ziyue Wang, Dong Han, Fahimeh Mohagheghian, Edith Mensah Otabil, Kamran Noorishirazi, Jordy Mehawej, Andreas Filippaios, Syed Naeem, Matthew F Gottbrecht, Timothy P Fitzgibbons, Jane S Saczynski, Bruce Barton, Ki Chon, David D McManus","doi":"10.2196/45137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cause of stroke, and timely diagnosis is critical for secondary prevention. Little is known about smartwatches for AF detection among stroke survivors. We aimed to examine accuracy, usability, and adherence to a smartwatch-based AF monitoring system designed by older stroke survivors and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to examine the feasibility of smartwatches for AF detection in older stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pulsewatch is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which stroke survivors received either a smartwatch-smartphone dyad for AF detection (Pulsewatch system) plus an electrocardiogram patch or the patch alone for 14 days to assess the accuracy and usability of the system (phase 1). Participants were subsequently rerandomized to potentially 30 additional days of system use to examine adherence to watch wear (phase 2). Participants were aged 50 years or older, had survived an ischemic stroke, and had no major contraindications to oral anticoagulants. The accuracy for AF detection was determined by comparing it to cardiologist-overread electrocardiogram patch, and the usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Adherence was operationalized as daily watch wear time over the 30-day monitoring period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 participants were enrolled (mean age 65 years; 50/120, 41% female; 106/120, 88% White). The Pulsewatch system demonstrated 92.9% (95% CI 85.3%-97.4%) accuracy for AF detection. Mean usability score was 65 out of 100, and on average, participants wore the watch for 21.2 (SD 8.3) of the 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that a smartwatch system designed by and for stroke survivors is a viable option for long-term arrhythmia detection among older adults at risk for AF, though it may benefit from strategies to enhance adherence to watch wear.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03761394; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03761394.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.07.002.</p>","PeriodicalId":14706,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cardio","volume":"7 ","pages":"e45137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10716742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cardio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/45137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cause of stroke, and timely diagnosis is critical for secondary prevention. Little is known about smartwatches for AF detection among stroke survivors. We aimed to examine accuracy, usability, and adherence to a smartwatch-based AF monitoring system designed by older stroke survivors and their caregivers.

Objective: This study aims to examine the feasibility of smartwatches for AF detection in older stroke survivors.

Methods: Pulsewatch is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which stroke survivors received either a smartwatch-smartphone dyad for AF detection (Pulsewatch system) plus an electrocardiogram patch or the patch alone for 14 days to assess the accuracy and usability of the system (phase 1). Participants were subsequently rerandomized to potentially 30 additional days of system use to examine adherence to watch wear (phase 2). Participants were aged 50 years or older, had survived an ischemic stroke, and had no major contraindications to oral anticoagulants. The accuracy for AF detection was determined by comparing it to cardiologist-overread electrocardiogram patch, and the usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Adherence was operationalized as daily watch wear time over the 30-day monitoring period.

Results: A total of 120 participants were enrolled (mean age 65 years; 50/120, 41% female; 106/120, 88% White). The Pulsewatch system demonstrated 92.9% (95% CI 85.3%-97.4%) accuracy for AF detection. Mean usability score was 65 out of 100, and on average, participants wore the watch for 21.2 (SD 8.3) of the 30 days.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that a smartwatch system designed by and for stroke survivors is a viable option for long-term arrhythmia detection among older adults at risk for AF, though it may benefit from strategies to enhance adherence to watch wear.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03761394; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03761394.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.07.002.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能手表在老年人脑卒中后房颤检测中的准确性、可用性和依从性:随机对照试验
背景:房颤(AF)是卒中的常见病因,及时诊断对二级预防至关重要。人们对智能手表在中风幸存者中检测心房颤动所知甚少。我们的目的是检查老年中风幸存者及其护理人员设计的基于智能手表的房颤监测系统的准确性、可用性和依从性。目的:本研究旨在探讨智能手表在老年卒中幸存者中检测房颤的可行性。方法:Pulsewatch是一项随机对照试验(RCT),在该试验中,中风幸存者要么接受用于AF检测的智能手表-智能手机组合(Pulsewatch系统)加上心电图贴片,要么单独接受贴片,为期14天,以评估系统的准确性和可用性(第一阶段)。随后,参与者被重新随机分配到可能额外使用30天的系统,以检查佩戴手表的依从性(第二阶段)。口服抗凝剂无重大禁忌症。通过与心脏科医师过读心电图贴片进行比较来确定房颤检测的准确性,并使用系统可用性量表(SUS)评估其可用性。依从性以30天监测期间每天佩戴手表的时间来衡量。结果:共纳入120名参与者(平均年龄65岁;50/120, 41%女性;106/120, 88%白人)。Pulsewatch系统检测AF的准确率为92.9% (95% CI 85.3%-97.4%)。平均可用性得分为65分(满分100分),参与者在30天中平均佩戴21.2天(标准差8.3)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,由中风幸存者设计并为其设计的智能手表系统对于有房颤风险的老年人长期心律失常检测是一种可行的选择,尽管它可能受益于增强手表佩戴依从性的策略。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03761394;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03761394.International注册报告标识符(irrid): RR2-10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.07.002。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Unravelling the complex biogeographic and anthropogenic history of Alaska’s mountain goats
IF 0 bioRxiv : the preprint server for biologyPub Date : 2023-08-08 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.07.552341
Kiana B. Young, Kevin S. White, A. Shafer
来源期刊
JMIR Cardio
JMIR Cardio Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acceptability of a Web-Based Health App (PortfolioDiet.app) to Translate a Nutrition Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease in High-Risk Adults: Mixed Methods Randomized Ancillary Pilot Study. Efficiency Improvement of the Clinical Pathway in Cardiac Monitor Insertion and Follow-Up: Retrospective Analysis. Wrist-Worn and Arm-Worn Wearables for Monitoring Heart Rate During Sedentary and Light-to-Vigorous Physical Activities: Device Validation Study. Optimization of the Care4Today Digital Health Platform to Enhance Self-Reporting of Medication Adherence and Health Experiences in Patients With Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease: Mixed Methods Study. Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Digital Technologies for Heart Disease Diagnosis: Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1