A Cluster Randomized Trial of Primary Care Practice Redesign to Integrate Behavioral Health for Those Who Need It Most: Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1370/afm.3027
Benjamin Littenberg, Jessica Clifton, Abigail M Crocker, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Levi N Bonnell, Ryan E Breshears, Peter Callas, Prama Chakravarti, Kelly Clark/Keefe, Deborah J Cohen, Frank V deGruy, Lauren Eidt-Pearson, William Elder, Chester Fox, Sylvie Frisbie, Katie Hekman, Juvena Hitt, Jennifer Jewiss, David C Kaelber, Kairn Stetler Kelley, Rodger Kessler, Jennifer B O'Rourke-Lavoie, George S Leibowitz, C R Macchi, Matthew P Martin, Mark McGovern, Brenda Mollis, Daniel Mullin, Zsolt Nagykaldi, Lisa W Natkin, Wilson Pace, Richard G Pinckney, Douglas Pomeroy, Paula Reynolds, Gail L Rose, Sarah Hudson Scholle, William J Sieber, Jeni Soucie, Terry Stancin, Kurt C Stange, Kari A Stephens, Kathryn Teng, Elizabeth Needham Waddell, Constance van Eeghen
{"title":"A Cluster Randomized Trial of Primary Care Practice Redesign to Integrate Behavioral Health for Those Who Need It Most: Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.","authors":"Benjamin Littenberg, Jessica Clifton, Abigail M Crocker, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Levi N Bonnell, Ryan E Breshears, Peter Callas, Prama Chakravarti, Kelly Clark/Keefe, Deborah J Cohen, Frank V deGruy, Lauren Eidt-Pearson, William Elder, Chester Fox, Sylvie Frisbie, Katie Hekman, Juvena Hitt, Jennifer Jewiss, David C Kaelber, Kairn Stetler Kelley, Rodger Kessler, Jennifer B O'Rourke-Lavoie, George S Leibowitz, C R Macchi, Matthew P Martin, Mark McGovern, Brenda Mollis, Daniel Mullin, Zsolt Nagykaldi, Lisa W Natkin, Wilson Pace, Richard G Pinckney, Douglas Pomeroy, Paula Reynolds, Gail L Rose, Sarah Hudson Scholle, William J Sieber, Jeni Soucie, Terry Stancin, Kurt C Stange, Kari A Stephens, Kathryn Teng, Elizabeth Needham Waddell, Constance van Eeghen","doi":"10.1370/afm.3027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient outcomes can improve when primary care and behavioral health providers use a collaborative system of care, but integrating these services is difficult. We tested the effectiveness of a practice intervention for improving patient outcomes by enhancing integrated behavioral health (IBH) activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial. The intervention combined practice redesign, quality improvement coaching, provider and staff education, and collaborative learning. At baseline and 2 years, staff at 42 primary care practices completed the Practice Integration Profile (PIP) as a measure of IBH. Adult patients with multiple chronic medical and behavioral conditions completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) survey. Primary outcomes were the change in 8 PROMIS-29 domain scores. Secondary outcomes included change in level of integration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intervention assignment had no effect on change in outcomes reported by 2,426 patients who completed both baseline and 2-year surveys. Practices assigned to the intervention improved PIP workflow scores but not PIP total scores. Baseline PIP total score was significantly associated with patient-reported function, independent of intervention. Active practices that completed intervention workbooks (n = 13) improved patient-reported outcomes and practice integration (<i>P</i> ≤ .05) compared with other active practices (n = 7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intervention assignment had no effect on change in patient outcomes; however, we did observe improved patient outcomes among practices that entered the study with greater IBH. We also observed more improvement of integration and patient outcomes among active practices that completed the intervention compared to active practices that did not. Additional research is needed to understand how implementation efforts to enhance IBH can best reach patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patient outcomes can improve when primary care and behavioral health providers use a collaborative system of care, but integrating these services is difficult. We tested the effectiveness of a practice intervention for improving patient outcomes by enhancing integrated behavioral health (IBH) activities.

Methods: We conducted a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial. The intervention combined practice redesign, quality improvement coaching, provider and staff education, and collaborative learning. At baseline and 2 years, staff at 42 primary care practices completed the Practice Integration Profile (PIP) as a measure of IBH. Adult patients with multiple chronic medical and behavioral conditions completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) survey. Primary outcomes were the change in 8 PROMIS-29 domain scores. Secondary outcomes included change in level of integration.

Results: Intervention assignment had no effect on change in outcomes reported by 2,426 patients who completed both baseline and 2-year surveys. Practices assigned to the intervention improved PIP workflow scores but not PIP total scores. Baseline PIP total score was significantly associated with patient-reported function, independent of intervention. Active practices that completed intervention workbooks (n = 13) improved patient-reported outcomes and practice integration (P ≤ .05) compared with other active practices (n = 7).

Conclusion: Intervention assignment had no effect on change in patient outcomes; however, we did observe improved patient outcomes among practices that entered the study with greater IBH. We also observed more improvement of integration and patient outcomes among active practices that completed the intervention compared to active practices that did not. Additional research is needed to understand how implementation efforts to enhance IBH can best reach patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健实践重新设计整合行为健康对那些最需要它的群体随机试验:多重慢性疾病患者。
目的:当初级保健和行为健康提供者使用协作的护理系统时,患者的预后可以得到改善,但整合这些服务是困难的。我们测试了通过加强综合行为健康(IBH)活动来改善患者预后的实践干预的有效性。方法:我们进行了一项实用的整群随机对照试验。干预措施结合了实践重新设计、质量改进指导、提供者和员工教育以及协作学习。在基线和第2年,42个初级保健诊所的工作人员完成了实践整合概况(PIP),作为IBH的衡量标准。患有多种慢性医学和行为疾病的成年患者完成了患者报告的结果测量信息系统(promise -29)调查。主要结果为8个允诺-29结构域评分的变化。次要结局包括整合水平的改变。结果:干预分配对2426名完成基线和2年调查的患者报告的结果没有影响。分配给干预的实践提高了PIP工作流程得分,但没有提高PIP总分。基线PIP总分与患者报告的功能显著相关,独立于干预。完成干预工作手册的积极实践(n = 13)与其他积极实践(n = 7)相比,改善了患者报告的结果和实践整合(P≤0.05)。结论:干预分配对患者结果的改变没有影响;然而,我们确实观察到,在进入研究的IBH较大的实践中,患者的预后有所改善。我们还观察到,与未完成干预的积极实践相比,完成干预的积极实践中整合和患者预后的改善更多。需要进一步的研究来了解如何加强IBH的实施工作才能最好地惠及患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
期刊最新文献
Prehospital Clinical Decision-Making for Medication Administration for Behavioral Emergencies. Rapid Antigen Testing in School Health Offices for Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A. Assessment and comparison of the ILI case definition in clinical and school-based community settings: ORCHARDS/IISP. Efficacy and Safety of BB-12 Supplemented Strawberry Yogurt For Healthy Children on Antibiotics (PLAY ON). Exploratory Pilot Studies to Demonstrate Mechanisms of Preventing Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea and the Role for Probiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1