Photobiomodulation and alopecia: a crowdsourced survey study on patient preferences.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy Pub Date : 2023-11-17 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1080/14764172.2023.2284641
Briana Paiewonsky, Margo Winter, Maria Hordinsky, MacKenzie Griffith, Ronda S Farah
{"title":"Photobiomodulation and alopecia: a crowdsourced survey study on patient preferences.","authors":"Briana Paiewonsky, Margo Winter, Maria Hordinsky, MacKenzie Griffith, Ronda S Farah","doi":"10.1080/14764172.2023.2284641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Photobiomodulation is a treatment option for hair loss and is currently FDA cleared for androgenetic alopecia. There are a variety of photobiomodulation devices intended for at-home patient use. However, data examining user preferences is lacking. A social media-based, online survey study was completed to understand patient preferences when selecting a photobiomodulation device. Secondary outcomes examined patient experience with the device. Sixty participants responded to the 21-question survey. The majority of participants had never used a photobiomodulation device (<i>n</i> = 50; 86.2%). Most respondents (<i>n</i> = 40; 67.8%) felt the efficacy of the device was the most important aspect to consider when selecting a photobiomodulation device. Additionally, a majority of participants thought 15 (<i>n</i> = 22; 37.3%) or 20 minutes (<i>n</i> = 17; 28.8%) would be a reasonable treatment duration and would prefer a hand-free device (<i>n</i> = 51; 86.4%). Of the eight participants who had used a photobiomodulation device, only one was dissatisfied with the device and discontinued treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2023.2284641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photobiomodulation is a treatment option for hair loss and is currently FDA cleared for androgenetic alopecia. There are a variety of photobiomodulation devices intended for at-home patient use. However, data examining user preferences is lacking. A social media-based, online survey study was completed to understand patient preferences when selecting a photobiomodulation device. Secondary outcomes examined patient experience with the device. Sixty participants responded to the 21-question survey. The majority of participants had never used a photobiomodulation device (n = 50; 86.2%). Most respondents (n = 40; 67.8%) felt the efficacy of the device was the most important aspect to consider when selecting a photobiomodulation device. Additionally, a majority of participants thought 15 (n = 22; 37.3%) or 20 minutes (n = 17; 28.8%) would be a reasonable treatment duration and would prefer a hand-free device (n = 51; 86.4%). Of the eight participants who had used a photobiomodulation device, only one was dissatisfied with the device and discontinued treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光生物调节和脱发:患者偏好的众包调查研究。
光生物调节是脱发的一种治疗选择,目前FDA批准了雄激素性脱发的治疗。有各种各样的光生物调节装置用于家庭患者使用。然而,调查用户偏好的数据是缺乏的。完成了一项基于社交媒体的在线调查研究,以了解患者在选择光生物调节装置时的偏好。次要结果检查患者使用该设备的经验。60名参与者回答了21个问题的调查。大多数参与者从未使用过光生物调节装置(n = 50;86.2%)。大多数受访者(n = 40;67.8%)认为设备的有效性是选择光生物调节设备时最重要的考虑因素。此外,大多数参与者认为15 (n = 22;37.3%)或20分钟(n = 17;28.8%)认为是合理的治疗时间,并倾向于使用免提装置(n = 51;86.4%)。在使用光生物调节装置的8名参与者中,只有1人对该装置不满意并停止治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique journal that focuses on the application of cosmetic laser and light therapies on the skin. The Journal of Cosmetic & Laser Therapy provides a forum for stimulating and up-to-date studies demonstrating the wide range of therapeutic options for clinicians and surgeons involved in cosmetic and dermatological treatment. The journal is aimed at dermatologists, cosmetic surgeons, plastic and facial plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and all those interested in the rapidly expanding field of cosmetic and laser therapy. Features include: -Cosmetic surgery, including facial rejuvenation, hair removal and skin resurfacing -Use of lasers and other light sources for cosmetic and dermatological treatment -Applications of peeling agents, fillers, injectables, implants and other cosmetic modalities -Topical treatments -Practical tips and safety issues
期刊最新文献
A comparison of surgical scar treatment using various combinations of autologous fat, hyaluronic acid and resurfacing with the 1540 nm non-ablative Erbium laser - a prospective pilot study. Intralesional vitamin D3 versus intralesional triamcinolone acetonoid in patchy alopecia areata: a comparative clinical and dermoscopic study. The assessment of the impact of carboxytherapy and selected chemical peels on cosmetic defects and signs of aging of skin around eyes. Treatment of familial glomangiomatosis with Nd:YAG laser: a case report Successful treatment of rare adverse event after radiofrequency microneedle on Fitzpatrick skin type IV : a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1