Perspectives of African American Social Workers Regarding Clinical Licensure.

Mose Walker, Christina Bruhn
{"title":"Perspectives of African American Social Workers Regarding Clinical Licensure.","authors":"Mose Walker, Christina Bruhn","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2023.2276117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was undertaken to illuminate the perspectives of African American MSWs, both licensed and unlicensed, concerning clinical licensure.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In 2022, but prior to the time of the Association for Social Work Boards (ASWB) report release, the primary author interviewed 20 African Americans with Master of Social Work (MSW) degrees regarding their desire and attempts to attain licensure. The participants were selected utilizing non-probability, convenience sampling methods and self-selected in response to invitations extended via social media platforms. The interviews took place via Zoom and were recorded and analyzed utilizing qualitative methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings suggested that many interviewees do view the test as biased in favor of White women and that they attribute lower test pass rates of African Americans in part to this bias. However, additional concerns, including the costs and difficulty of multiple test-taking efforts, the time limit between MSW and licensure, and the dearth of information available to MSWs about licensing credentials, among others, were also cited. Respondents also identified, in some cases, limitations in social support, particularly in work settings, for their professional development efforts. Significantly, many participants identified problems with supervision - securing supervision, the focus/content of supervision, or both.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Recommendations for steps to increase access to the test and to information about the test are offered. Importantly, discussion regarding avenues to supervision and mentorship is initiated. This study offers a first step in the process of engaging with African Americans about their own experiences with the licensing process.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"145-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2023.2276117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was undertaken to illuminate the perspectives of African American MSWs, both licensed and unlicensed, concerning clinical licensure.

Method: In 2022, but prior to the time of the Association for Social Work Boards (ASWB) report release, the primary author interviewed 20 African Americans with Master of Social Work (MSW) degrees regarding their desire and attempts to attain licensure. The participants were selected utilizing non-probability, convenience sampling methods and self-selected in response to invitations extended via social media platforms. The interviews took place via Zoom and were recorded and analyzed utilizing qualitative methods.

Results: The findings suggested that many interviewees do view the test as biased in favor of White women and that they attribute lower test pass rates of African Americans in part to this bias. However, additional concerns, including the costs and difficulty of multiple test-taking efforts, the time limit between MSW and licensure, and the dearth of information available to MSWs about licensing credentials, among others, were also cited. Respondents also identified, in some cases, limitations in social support, particularly in work settings, for their professional development efforts. Significantly, many participants identified problems with supervision - securing supervision, the focus/content of supervision, or both.

Discussion and conclusions: Recommendations for steps to increase access to the test and to information about the test are offered. Importantly, discussion regarding avenues to supervision and mentorship is initiated. This study offers a first step in the process of engaging with African Americans about their own experiences with the licensing process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非裔美国社会工作者对临床执照的看法。
目的:本研究旨在阐明非裔美国msw(包括有执照的和无执照的)在临床许可方面的观点。方法:在2022年,但在社会工作委员会协会(ASWB)报告发布之前,主要作者采访了20名拥有社会工作硕士(MSW)学位的非洲裔美国人,了解他们获得执照的愿望和尝试。参与者的选择采用非概率、便利抽样和自我选择的方法,以回应通过社交媒体平台发出的邀请。访谈通过Zoom进行,并使用定性方法进行记录和分析。结果:调查结果表明,许多受访者确实认为该测试偏袒白人女性,他们将非洲裔美国人的较低考试通过率部分归因于这种偏见。然而,也有人提出了其他问题,包括多次参加考试的成本和难度、城市固体废物与获得许可证之间的时间限制以及城市固体废物获得许可证证书的信息不足等。答复者还指出,在某些情况下,社会支持,特别是在工作环境中,限制了他们的专业发展努力。值得注意的是,许多与会者指出了监管方面的问题——确保监管,监管的重点/内容,或两者兼而有之。讨论和结论:提出了增加获得测试和有关测试信息的步骤建议。重要的是,开始了关于监督和指导途径的讨论。这项研究为与非裔美国人接触他们自己在许可过程中的经历提供了第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mental Health Problems of Self-Employed Workers: A Systematic Review of Potential Moderators. Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Revised Attitudes Toward Research Scale for Use with MSW Students. Racial Discrimination and Mental Health: Analyzing the Impact of Discrimination, Stress, Depressive Symptoms and Self-Esteem on Anxiety Experiences. Implementing Evidence-Based Practices in Rural Areas: Development and Testing of a Researcher Practitioner Collaboration in Mental Health. The Role of Social Support in Enhancing Life Satisfaction Among Syrian Refugees in Türkiye During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1