Using Clinical Narratives in Program and Curriculum Evaluation.

C Melillo, M Chavez, G Powell-Cope, D Rugs, L Cowan, S M Shaw, B Barrett, K W Rugen
{"title":"Using Clinical Narratives in Program and Curriculum Evaluation.","authors":"C Melillo, M Chavez, G Powell-Cope, D Rugs, L Cowan, S M Shaw, B Barrett, K W Rugen","doi":"10.61545/JHSE-1-203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using personal experience stories as teaching tools, clinical narratives are an effective means for sharing the art of nursing practice and provide insight into nurses' critical thinking and clinical proficiency. Using clinical narratives to assess curriculum effectiveness provides important insights into changed practice and learning beyond the classroom.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This article provides an example of using clinical narratives in the evaluation of the Department of Veterans Health Affairs Office of Nursing Services (ONS) Evidence Based Practice Curriculum (EBPC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a larger mixed-method evaluation of the EBPC, clinical narrative methods were employed to describe one incident where participants (n=3) applied at least two of three evidence based practice components (best available evidence; clinical expertise; patient preference).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Examination of clinical narratives demonstrated successful application of key components of evidence based practice and an integration into individual nursing practice beyond data obtained from other evaluation methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating rich clinical narratives into a rigorous mixed-method program evaluation protocol provides insights beyond information uptake, satisfaction, efficacy, or competency assessment scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":73768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health science & education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10680199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health science & education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61545/JHSE-1-203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Using personal experience stories as teaching tools, clinical narratives are an effective means for sharing the art of nursing practice and provide insight into nurses' critical thinking and clinical proficiency. Using clinical narratives to assess curriculum effectiveness provides important insights into changed practice and learning beyond the classroom.

Aim: This article provides an example of using clinical narratives in the evaluation of the Department of Veterans Health Affairs Office of Nursing Services (ONS) Evidence Based Practice Curriculum (EBPC).

Methods: As part of a larger mixed-method evaluation of the EBPC, clinical narrative methods were employed to describe one incident where participants (n=3) applied at least two of three evidence based practice components (best available evidence; clinical expertise; patient preference).

Results: Examination of clinical narratives demonstrated successful application of key components of evidence based practice and an integration into individual nursing practice beyond data obtained from other evaluation methods.

Conclusions: Incorporating rich clinical narratives into a rigorous mixed-method program evaluation protocol provides insights beyond information uptake, satisfaction, efficacy, or competency assessment scores.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床叙述在项目与课程评估中的应用。
背景:临床叙事以个人经历故事为教学工具,是分享护理实践艺术和洞察护士批判性思维和临床熟练程度的有效手段。使用临床叙述来评估课程有效性,为改变实践和课堂之外的学习提供了重要的见解。目的:本文提供了一个在退伍军人健康事务部护理服务办公室(ONS)循证实践课程(EBPC)评估中使用临床叙述的例子。方法:作为EBPC的大型混合方法评估的一部分,临床叙述方法被用于描述一个事件,参与者(n=3)应用了至少三个基于证据的实践组成部分中的两个(最佳可获得证据;临床专业知识;病人偏好)。结果:临床叙述的检查证明了成功应用循证实践的关键组成部分,并将其整合到个人护理实践中,而不是从其他评估方法获得的数据。结论:将丰富的临床叙述纳入严格的混合方法方案评估方案提供了超越信息吸收,满意度,疗效或能力评估分数的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Delivering a Healthy Lifestyle Intervention: Promotora Findings from Familias Sanas y Activas II. HIV Knowledge, Risk Behaviors, and Testing Among Chinese-, Korean-, and Vietnamese-American Women. Early Care and Education Professionals' Breastfeeding Knowledge and Practices Before and After an E-Learning Program. Autism Spectrum Disorder-Associated Behaviour in Infants with Down Syndrome. Using Clinical Narratives in Program and Curriculum Evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1