Predicting transfer to haemodialysis using the peritoneal dialysis surprise question.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Peritoneal Dialysis International Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1177/08968608231214143
Ayesha Anwaar, Sai Liu, Maria Montez-Rath, Hatsumi Neilsen, Sumi Sun, Graham Abra, Brigitte Schiller, Wael F Hussein
{"title":"Predicting transfer to haemodialysis using the peritoneal dialysis surprise question.","authors":"Ayesha Anwaar, Sai Liu, Maria Montez-Rath, Hatsumi Neilsen, Sumi Sun, Graham Abra, Brigitte Schiller, Wael F Hussein","doi":"10.1177/08968608231214143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People on peritoneal dialysis (PD) at risk of transfer to haemodialysis (HD) need support to remain on PD or ensure a safe transition to HD. Simple point-of-care risk stratification tools are needed to direct limited dialysis centre resources. In this study, we evaluated the utility of collecting clinicians' identification of patients at high risk of transfer to HD using a single point of care question.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, we included 1275 patients undergoing PD in 35 home dialysis programmes. We modified the palliative care 'surprise question' (SQ) by asking the registered nurse and treating nephrologist: 'Would you be surprised if this patient transferred to HD in the next six months?' A 'yes' or 'no' answer indicated low and high risk, respectively. We subsequently followed patient outcomes for 6 months. Cox regression model estimated the hazard ratio (HR) of transfer to HD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' mean age was 59 ± 16 years, 41% were female and the median PD vintage was 20 months (interquartile range: 9-40). Responses were received from nurses for 1123 patients, indicating 169 (15%) as high risk and 954 (85%) as low risk. Over the next 6 months, transfer to HD occurred in 18 (11%) versus 29 (3%) of the high and low-risk groups, respectively (HR: 3.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.17-7.05). Nephrologist responses were obtained for 692 patients, with 118 (17%) and 574 (83%) identified as high and low risk, respectively. Transfer to HD was observed in 14 (12%) of the high-risk group and 14 (2%) of the low-risk group (HR: 5.56, 95% CI: 2.65-11.67). Patients in the high-risk group experienced higher rates of death and hospitalisation than low-risk patients, with peritonitis events being similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PDSQ is a simple point of care tool that can help identify patients at high risk of transfer to HD and other poor clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608231214143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People on peritoneal dialysis (PD) at risk of transfer to haemodialysis (HD) need support to remain on PD or ensure a safe transition to HD. Simple point-of-care risk stratification tools are needed to direct limited dialysis centre resources. In this study, we evaluated the utility of collecting clinicians' identification of patients at high risk of transfer to HD using a single point of care question.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, we included 1275 patients undergoing PD in 35 home dialysis programmes. We modified the palliative care 'surprise question' (SQ) by asking the registered nurse and treating nephrologist: 'Would you be surprised if this patient transferred to HD in the next six months?' A 'yes' or 'no' answer indicated low and high risk, respectively. We subsequently followed patient outcomes for 6 months. Cox regression model estimated the hazard ratio (HR) of transfer to HD.

Results: Patients' mean age was 59 ± 16 years, 41% were female and the median PD vintage was 20 months (interquartile range: 9-40). Responses were received from nurses for 1123 patients, indicating 169 (15%) as high risk and 954 (85%) as low risk. Over the next 6 months, transfer to HD occurred in 18 (11%) versus 29 (3%) of the high and low-risk groups, respectively (HR: 3.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.17-7.05). Nephrologist responses were obtained for 692 patients, with 118 (17%) and 574 (83%) identified as high and low risk, respectively. Transfer to HD was observed in 14 (12%) of the high-risk group and 14 (2%) of the low-risk group (HR: 5.56, 95% CI: 2.65-11.67). Patients in the high-risk group experienced higher rates of death and hospitalisation than low-risk patients, with peritonitis events being similar between the two groups.

Conclusions: The PDSQ is a simple point of care tool that can help identify patients at high risk of transfer to HD and other poor clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用腹膜透析意外问题预测血液透析转移。
背景:腹膜透析(PD)患者有转移到血液透析(HD)的风险,需要支持以保持PD或确保安全过渡到HD。需要简单的护理点风险分层工具来指导有限的透析中心资源。在这项研究中,我们使用单点护理问题评估了收集临床医生对转移到HD的高风险患者的识别的效用。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,我们纳入了35个家庭透析方案中的1275例PD患者。我们修改了姑息治疗的“意外问题”(SQ),问注册护士和主治肾病专家:“如果这个病人在未来6个月内转到HD,你会感到惊讶吗?”回答“是”或“否”分别表示低风险和高风险。我们随后对患者进行了6个月的随访。Cox回归模型估计了转移到HD的风险比(HR)。结果:患者平均年龄59±16岁,女性占41%,中位PD年龄为20个月(四分位数间距:9-40)。收到1123例患者的护士回复,其中169例(15%)为高风险,954例(85%)为低风险。在接下来的6个月里,高危组和低危组中分别有18人(11%)和29人(3%)发生了HD转移(HR: 3.92, 95%可信区间(CI): 2.17-7.05)。692名患者获得了肾病专家的反馈,其中118名(17%)和574名(83%)分别被确定为高风险和低风险。高危组14例(12%)和低危组14例(2%)发生HD转移(HR: 5.56, 95% CI: 2.65-11.67)。高危组患者的死亡率和住院率高于低危组患者,两组之间的腹膜炎事件相似。结论:PDSQ是一种简单的护理点工具,可以帮助识别转移到HD的高风险患者和其他不良临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
期刊最新文献
Impact of home-based exercise on residual kidney function in patients initiating peritoneal dialysis: A feasibility multicenter randomized controlled trial. Assessing the stability of daptomycin in icodextrin-based peritoneal dialysis solution. Clinicians' priorities for exercise programming for people receiving peritoneal dialysis: Qualitative content analysis from an international survey. Relationship between fill volume and transport in peritoneal dialysis-from bench to bedside. A unique case of mesothelial cyst removal during peritoneal dialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1