Peritoneal Dialysis International最新文献

Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is commonly performed using either intermittent or tidal exchanges, whereas other exchange techniques such as continuous flow PD are little used. Previous research indicated that stirring the intra-peritoneal dialysate markedly increases small solute clearances. Here, we tested the hypothesis that stirring of the dialysate increases small solute clearances by using a novel exchange technique where the dialysate is pulsed back and forth during the treatment without addition of fresh fluid.

Methods: PD was performed in anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats with either no pulsations (20 mL fill volume), 2 mL (10%) pulses (21 mL fill volume), or 5 mL (25%) pulses (22.5 mL fill volume) utilizing a pulse flow rate of 5 mL/min. The higher fill volume for the pulsed treatments compensates for the fact that the average intra-peritoneal volume would otherwise be lower in pulsed treatments. Water and solute transport were closely monitored during the treatment.

Results: Net ultrafiltration decreased significantly during pulsed PD with the 25% pulse volume. The 60 min sodium dip was unaltered, whereas the fluid absorption rate was increased for the 25% group. Solute clearances did not significantly differ between groups, except for a slightly lower calcium clearance in the 25% group.

Conclusion: Our data indicate that stirring the dialysate using pulsed exchanges does not provide any advantage compared to conventional exchange techniques. In contrast, pulsed treatments had slightly lower ultrafiltration and small solute transport. The present findings may have implications regarding the choice of tidal volume in automated PD, favoring smaller tidal volumes.

Utero-vaginal prolapse is a common condition in the female population. In addition to well-known predisposing risk factors malnutrition, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and dialysis technique may favour its occurrence or aggravation, especially in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Depending on severity, a relative contraindication to peritoneal dialysis (PD) could be considered. We report the cases of two patients with a grade IV utero-vaginal prolapse who successfully started PD after obliterative surgery (partial colpocleisis by Le Fort).

Background: Technique survival, also reported with negative connotations as technique failure or transfer from peritoneal dialysis to haemodialysis, has been identified by patients, caregivers and health professionals as a critically important outcome to be reported in all trials. However, there is wide variation in how peritoneal dialysis technique survival is defined, measured and reported, leading to difficulty in comparing or consolidating results.

Methods: We conducted an online international consensus workshop to establish a core outcome measure of technique survival. Discussions were analysed thematically.

Results: Fifty-five participants including 14 patients and caregivers from 13 countries took part in facilitated breakout discussions using video-conferencing. The following themes were identified: capturing important aspects of the outcome (requiring a core event to define the outcome, distinguishing temporary from permanent events, recognising heterogeneous experiences of transfers), adopting appropriate neutral nomenclature (conveying with clarity, avoiding negative connotations), and ensuring feasibility and applicability (capturing data relevant to clinical and research settings, ease of adoption). The suggested definitions for the core outcome measure were 'the event of a transfer to haemodialysis', or 'discontinuation of peritoneal dialysis'. Applying the principles described within the workshop, defining the outcome measure as a 'transfer to haemodialysis' was preferable.

Conclusions: It is proposed that the core outcome of technique survival is redefined as 'transfer to haemodialysis' and that its components are standardised using simple, neutral terminology Components considered important by stakeholders included recording the reasons for transfer from peritoneal dialysis, and focussing on permanent events whilst ensuring the outcome remains easy to implement.

This case report discusses the complex management of a 46-year-old man with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus, stage 5 chronic kidney disease, and severe neuropathic complications, which led to bilateral leg amputations. The patient experienced persistent diarrhea due to diabetic neuropathy, significantly impairing his daily functioning. Despite transitioning from hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis, the diarrhea persisted. A colostomy was subsequently performed, which, although it did not completely resolve the diarrhea, allowed for better control, improving the patient's self-care and independence. Notably, the catheter exit site was maintained on the opposite side of the abdomen. Despite initial concerns about the feasibility of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with stomas, including the challenges of creating a stoma in patients with an existing PD catheter, this case demonstrates the successful continuation of PD following a colostomy. Traditionally, intestinal stomas have been viewed as a relative contraindication to PD due to risks such as leakage and infection. However, current guidelines recommend using extended catheters with a presternal exit site to minimize these risks. The patient's quality of life improved significantly after the colostomy, with no major complications observed during follow-up. This report underscores the importance of tailoring treatment to individual patient needs, balancing risks with potential well-being benefits, and highlights the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration and adherence to best practices. Given the limited literature on PD in patients with intestinal stomas, this case contributes valuable clinical insights for future management.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs frequently in the neurocritical intensive care unit and is associated with greater morbidity and mortality. AKI and its treatment, including acute kidney replacement therapy, can expose patients to a secondary greater brain injury. This study aimed to explore the role of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in neurocritical AKI patients in relation to metabolic and fluid control, complications related to PD and outcome.

Methods: Neurocritical AKI patients were treated by PD (prescribed Kt/V = 0.40/session) using a flexible catheter and a cycler and lactate as a buffer.

Results: A total of 58 patients were included. The mean age was 61.8 ± 13.2 years, 65.5% were in the intensive care unit, 68.5% needed intravenous inotropic agents, 72.4% were on mechanical ventilation, APACHE II was 16 ± 6.67 and the main neurological diagnoses were stroke (25.9%) and intracerebral haemorrhage (31%). Ischaemic acute tubular necrosis (iATN) was the most common cause of AKI (51.7%), followed by nephrotoxic ATN AKI (25.8%). The main dialysis indications were uraemia and hypervolemia. Blood urea and creatinine levels stabilised after four sessions at around 48 ± 11 mg/dL and 2.9 ± 0.4 mg/dL, respectively. Negative fluid balance and ultrafiltration increased progressively and stabilised around 2.1 ± 0.4 L /day. Weekly delivered Kt/V was 2.6 ± 0.31. The median number of high-volume PD sessions was 6 (4-10). Peritonitis and mechanical complications were not frequent (8.6% and 10.3%, respectively). Mortality rate was 58.6%. Logistic regression identified as factors associated with death in neurocritical AKI patients: age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-2.16, p = 0.001), nephrotoxic AKI (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.69- 0.95, p = 0.03), mechanical ventilation (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.17-2.46, p = 0.01), intracerebral haemorrhage as main neurological diagnoses (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.09-2.11, p = 0.03) and negative fluid balance after two PD sessions (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.74-0.97, p = 0.009).

Conclusion: Our study suggests that careful prescription may contribute to providing adequate treatment for most neurocritical AKI patients without contraindications for PD use, allowing adequate metabolic and fluid control, with no increase in the number of infectious, mechanical and metabolic complications. Mechanical ventilation, positive fluid balance and intracerebral haemorrhage were factors associated with mortality, while patients with nephrotoxic AKI had lower odds of mortality compared to those with septic and ischaemic AKI. Further studies are needed to investigate better the role of PD in neurocritical patients with AKI.

Effective treatment of infections is a growing challenge owing to antimicrobial resistance. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients experience more frequent hospitalisations than the general population and have greater exposure to antibiotics, making them particularly vulnerable to this threat. Over the last decade, we have noted a surge in cases of complicated peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PD peritonitis) caused by antimicrobial-resistant organisms, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fungi. Practitioners must be alert to these organisms, seek early recognition of these resistance patterns and make timely adjustments in order to avoid delay in treatment that may increase risk of PD catheter removal and technique failure. We present a case of successful treatment of ESBL peritonitis, highlight its challenges, while providing guidance on management of other unusual and complicated PD peritonitis.

Catheter-related tunnel infection may lead to peritonitis and discontinuation of performing high-quality peritoneal dialysis (PD). Tunnel infection is commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Gas-forming bacterial infection is rare in patients with PD and even exceedingly rare when such a infection spreads along the PD catheter tract. The first case of emphysematous PD catheter infection is presented here.

Background: Cat ownership is common in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, even with recent guidelines recommending avoiding domestic animals during PD exchanges to limit the risk of peritonitis due to pet contamination. We analysed the outcomes of patients who experienced cat-related peritonitis compared with those who experienced peritonitis due to other causes.

Methods: This retrospective study based on the Registre de Dialyse Peritoneale de Langue Française data analysed the outcomes of 52 patients experiencing cat-related peritonitis from the beginning of the database (1986) until 21 June 2022 compared with those of 208 matched patients experiencing peritonitis due to other causes. A Cox regression model examined the association between cat-related peritonitis and the composite end point of death in PD or transfer to haemodialysis (HD), death in PD and transfer to HD.

Results: Among patients with an episode of cat-related peritonitis, 11 (21.1%) died, 19 (36.5%) were transferred to HD and 11 (21.1%) were transplanted. In the group with other causes of peritonitis, these numbers were 67 (32%), 81 (39%) and 26 (12.5%), respectively. In multivariate survival analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.70) and use of assisted PD (HR: 4.07; 95% CI: 2.11-7.86) were associated with the risk of death. Having experienced cat-related peritonitis was not significantly associated with any of the three outcomes (death, transfer to HD or PD cessation).

Conclusions: Patients on PD should be aware that cats may cause a peritoneal infection, which results in similar consequences to those of other causes of peritonitis. However, pets at home should not be considered a contraindication to PD.