Retrospective analysis of ferric sulfate and sodium hypochlorite pulpotomy procedures in primary molars.

Q4 Dentistry Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-11 DOI:10.34172/joddd.2023.39312
Hayri Akman, Koray Surme
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of ferric sulfate and sodium hypochlorite pulpotomy procedures in primary molars.","authors":"Hayri Akman, Koray Surme","doi":"10.34172/joddd.2023.39312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulpotomy is a vital pulp treatment procedure frequently used in primary molars to preserve pulp vitality and function until tooth exfoliation. There is currently no pulp medicament with all the features of the ideal pulpotomy material. The present study compared the radiographic success of sodium hypochlorite with ferric sulfate (FS) when used for pulpotomy in primary molars.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the success rates of primary molars pulpotomized using sodium hypochlorite or FS according to radiographic findings. Healthy 4‒10-year-old children who had pulpotomy procedures on primary molars between 2018 and 2021 at the pediatric dental clinic and had a control radiograph at least 12 months later were enrolled in the study. The chi-squared test was used to determine the differences in success between these two materials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142 teeth, including 85 (59.9%) first primary molars and 57 (40.1%) second primary molars, in 98 healthy children were evaluated. The mean follow-up period of the teeth included in the study was 585.1±249.4 days. Radiographic success rates for NaOCl and FS groups were 73.8% and 71.0%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i>>0.05). Internal root resorption (IRR) was the most common cause of radiographic failure in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiographic success rates of both materials were similar, and using these materials in primary molar pulpotomy procedures can be recommended in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","volume":"17 3","pages":"182-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.39312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulpotomy is a vital pulp treatment procedure frequently used in primary molars to preserve pulp vitality and function until tooth exfoliation. There is currently no pulp medicament with all the features of the ideal pulpotomy material. The present study compared the radiographic success of sodium hypochlorite with ferric sulfate (FS) when used for pulpotomy in primary molars.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the success rates of primary molars pulpotomized using sodium hypochlorite or FS according to radiographic findings. Healthy 4‒10-year-old children who had pulpotomy procedures on primary molars between 2018 and 2021 at the pediatric dental clinic and had a control radiograph at least 12 months later were enrolled in the study. The chi-squared test was used to determine the differences in success between these two materials.

Results: A total of 142 teeth, including 85 (59.9%) first primary molars and 57 (40.1%) second primary molars, in 98 healthy children were evaluated. The mean follow-up period of the teeth included in the study was 585.1±249.4 days. Radiographic success rates for NaOCl and FS groups were 73.8% and 71.0%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Internal root resorption (IRR) was the most common cause of radiographic failure in both groups.

Conclusion: Radiographic success rates of both materials were similar, and using these materials in primary molar pulpotomy procedures can be recommended in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硫酸铁与次氯酸钠牙髓切开术的回顾性分析。
背景:牙髓切开术是一种重要的牙髓治疗方法,经常用于初级磨牙,以保持牙髓的活力和功能,直到牙齿脱落。目前还没有一种牙髓药物具有理想的牙髓切开术材料的所有特征。本研究比较了次氯酸钠和硫酸铁(FS)在切牙术中的放射成像成功率。方法:根据影像学表现,回顾性分析次氯酸钠或FS对初生磨牙去髓的成功率。健康的4 - 10岁儿童在2018年至2021年期间在儿童牙科诊所进行了乳牙切开术,并在至少12个月后进行了对照x线片检查,他们参加了这项研究。使用卡方检验来确定这两种材料之间成功的差异。结果:98例健康儿童共142颗牙,其中第一磨牙85颗(59.9%),第二磨牙57颗(40.1%)。随访时间平均为585.1±249.4天。NaOCl组和FS组放射成功率分别为73.8%和71.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。根内吸收(IRR)是两组患者放射治疗失败的最常见原因。结论:两种材料的x线摄影成功率相似,在临床实践中可推荐使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects (JODDD) is a Platinum* Open Access, peer-reviewed quarterly indexed journal that publishes articles of basic, clinical, and prospective nature in all areas of dentistry and oral health.
期刊最新文献
Correlation between Clinical manifestations, radiographic findings, and operative diagnosis of pulpal status in primary molars in 4‒8-year-old children: A cross-sectional study. Effect of fiber placement on the fracture resistance of moderate-size MOD cavities in maxillary premolars: An in vitro study. Evaluation of the effect of osseodensification on the peri-implant condition: A clinical, biochemical, and radiographic trial. Impact of adhesive layer addition on the optical properties of remineralized white spot lesions. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in single and three-unit implant-supported prostheses with different internal connections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1