Multisensory subtypes of aphantasia: Mental imagery as supramodal perception in reverse

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neures.2023.11.009
Alexei Joel Dawes , Rebecca Keogh , Joel Pearson
{"title":"Multisensory subtypes of aphantasia: Mental imagery as supramodal perception in reverse","authors":"Alexei Joel Dawes ,&nbsp;Rebecca Keogh ,&nbsp;Joel Pearson","doi":"10.1016/j.neures.2023.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cognitive neuroscience research on mental imagery has largely focused on the visual imagery modality in unimodal task contexts. Recent studies have uncovered striking individual differences in visual imagery capacity, with some individuals reporting a subjective absence of conscious visual imagery ability altogether (“aphantasia”). However, naturalistic mental imagery is often multi-sensory, and preliminary findings suggest that many individuals with aphantasia also report a subjective lack of mental imagery in other sensory domains (such as auditory or olfactory imagery). In this paper, we perform a series of cluster analyses on the multi-sensory imagery questionnaire scores of two large groups of aphantasic subjects, defining latent sub-groups in this sample population. We demonstrate that aphantasia is a heterogenous phenomenon characterised by dominant sub-groups of individuals with visual aphantasia (those who report selective visual imagery absence) and multi-sensory aphantasia (those who report an inability to generate conscious mental imagery in any sensory modality). We replicate our findings in a second large sample and show that more unique aphantasia sub-types also exist, such as individuals with selectively preserved mental imagery in only one sensory modality (e.g. intact auditory imagery). We outline the implications of our findings for network theories of mental imagery, discussing how unique aphantasia aetiologies with distinct self-report patterns might reveal alterations to various levels of the sensory processing hierarchy implicated in mental imagery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19146,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Pages 50-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168010223002043/pdfft?md5=ba224bf1cfa96381c036551b1cdea95c&pid=1-s2.0-S0168010223002043-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168010223002043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience research on mental imagery has largely focused on the visual imagery modality in unimodal task contexts. Recent studies have uncovered striking individual differences in visual imagery capacity, with some individuals reporting a subjective absence of conscious visual imagery ability altogether (“aphantasia”). However, naturalistic mental imagery is often multi-sensory, and preliminary findings suggest that many individuals with aphantasia also report a subjective lack of mental imagery in other sensory domains (such as auditory or olfactory imagery). In this paper, we perform a series of cluster analyses on the multi-sensory imagery questionnaire scores of two large groups of aphantasic subjects, defining latent sub-groups in this sample population. We demonstrate that aphantasia is a heterogenous phenomenon characterised by dominant sub-groups of individuals with visual aphantasia (those who report selective visual imagery absence) and multi-sensory aphantasia (those who report an inability to generate conscious mental imagery in any sensory modality). We replicate our findings in a second large sample and show that more unique aphantasia sub-types also exist, such as individuals with selectively preserved mental imagery in only one sensory modality (e.g. intact auditory imagery). We outline the implications of our findings for network theories of mental imagery, discussing how unique aphantasia aetiologies with distinct self-report patterns might reveal alterations to various levels of the sensory processing hierarchy implicated in mental imagery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幻觉的多感觉亚型:心理意象作为超模态知觉的反向。
认知神经科学对心理意象的研究主要集中在单模态任务情境下的视觉意象模态。最近的研究揭示了视觉意象能力的显著个体差异,一些人报告主观地完全缺乏有意识的视觉意象能力(“幻觉”)。然而,自然的心理意象往往是多感官的,初步研究结果表明,许多患有幻觉症的个体也报告在其他感官领域(如听觉或嗅觉意象)主观缺乏心理意象。在本文中,我们对两大组幻像受试者的多感官意象问卷得分进行了一系列聚类分析,定义了该样本群体中的潜在亚群。我们证明幻像症是一种异质性现象,其特征是视觉幻像症(那些报告选择性视觉意象缺失的人)和多感官幻像症(那些报告无法在任何感官模式下产生有意识的心理意象的人)的显性亚群体。我们在第二个大样本中重复了我们的发现,并表明更多独特的幻视亚型也存在,例如只在一种感觉模式下选择性地保留心理意象的个体(例如完整的听觉意象)。我们概述了我们的发现对心理意象网络理论的影响,讨论了具有不同自我报告模式的独特幻觉病因如何揭示与心理意象有关的感觉加工层次的不同水平的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience Research
Neuroscience Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: The international journal publishing original full-length research articles, short communications, technical notes, and reviews on all aspects of neuroscience Neuroscience Research is an international journal for high quality articles in all branches of neuroscience, from the molecular to the behavioral levels. The journal is published in collaboration with the Japan Neuroscience Society and is open to all contributors in the world.
期刊最新文献
LRP1-mediated p-tau propagation contributes to cognitive impairment after chronic neuropathic pain in rats. Stress and parental behaviors. Spatial dynamics of spontaneous activity in the developing and adult cortices. Detailed analysis of drift diffusion model parameters estimated for the ultimatum game. Cell type census in cerebral cortex reveals species-specific brain function and connectivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1