Exposure to e-cigarette advertisements and non-advertising content in relation to use behaviors and perceptions among US and Israeli adults.

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2023-11-29 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/173558
Zongshuan Duan, Lorien C Abroms, Yuxian Cui, Yan Wang, Cassidy R LoParco, Hagai Levine, Yael Bar-Zeev, Amal Khayat, Carla J Berg
{"title":"Exposure to e-cigarette advertisements and non-advertising content in relation to use behaviors and perceptions among US and Israeli adults.","authors":"Zongshuan Duan, Lorien C Abroms, Yuxian Cui, Yan Wang, Cassidy R LoParco, Hagai Levine, Yael Bar-Zeev, Amal Khayat, Carla J Berg","doi":"10.18332/tpc/173558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As e-cigarette marketing strategies diversify, it is important to examine exposure to and impact of e-cigarette advertisements and non-advertising content (e.g. on social media) via multiple media channels among adults in different regulatory contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2021 cross-sectional data among 2222 adults in the US (n=1128) and Israel (n=1094), multivariable regression examined past-month e-cigarette advertisement and non-advertising content exposure in relation to past-month e-cigarette use (logistic regression), as well as use intentions and risk perceptions (linear regressions), controlling for sociodemographics and tobacco use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 20.3% reported past-month e-cigarette use (15.5% US, 25.2% Israel), 46.1% any advertisement exposure (28.7% digital media, 25.2% traditional media, 16.8% retail settings), and 34.1% any non-advertising exposure (19.4% social media, 13.6% websites, 12.3% movie/television/theater, 5.8% radio/podcasts). Exposure to digital media advertisements (AOR=1.95; 95% CI: 1.42-2.66), traditional media advertisements (AOR=2.00; 95% CI=1.49-2.68), and social media non-advertising (AOR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.25-2.36) correlated with e-cigarette use. Exposure to traditional media advertisements (β=0.23; 95% CI: 0.08-0.38) and social media non-advertising (β=0.26; 95% CI: 0.09-0.43) correlated with use intentions. Exposure to digital media advertisements (β= -0.32; 95% CI: -0.57 - -0.08), retail setting advertisements (β= -0.30; 95% CI: -0.58 - -0.03), and radio/podcast non-advertising (β= -0.44; 95% CI: -0.84 - -0.03) correlated with lower perceived addictiveness. Radio/podcast non-advertising exposure (β= -0.50; 95% CI: -0.84 - -0.16) correlated with lower perceived harm. However, retail setting advertisement exposure was associated with e-cigarette non-use (AOR=0.61; 95% CI: 0.42-0.87), and traditional media advertisement (β=0.38; 95% CI: 0.15-0.61) and social media non-advertising exposure (β=0.40; 95% CI: 0.14-0.66) correlated with greater perceived addictiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-cigarette-related promotional content exposure across media platforms impacts perceptions and use, thus warranting regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/173558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As e-cigarette marketing strategies diversify, it is important to examine exposure to and impact of e-cigarette advertisements and non-advertising content (e.g. on social media) via multiple media channels among adults in different regulatory contexts.

Methods: Using 2021 cross-sectional data among 2222 adults in the US (n=1128) and Israel (n=1094), multivariable regression examined past-month e-cigarette advertisement and non-advertising content exposure in relation to past-month e-cigarette use (logistic regression), as well as use intentions and risk perceptions (linear regressions), controlling for sociodemographics and tobacco use.

Results: Overall, 20.3% reported past-month e-cigarette use (15.5% US, 25.2% Israel), 46.1% any advertisement exposure (28.7% digital media, 25.2% traditional media, 16.8% retail settings), and 34.1% any non-advertising exposure (19.4% social media, 13.6% websites, 12.3% movie/television/theater, 5.8% radio/podcasts). Exposure to digital media advertisements (AOR=1.95; 95% CI: 1.42-2.66), traditional media advertisements (AOR=2.00; 95% CI=1.49-2.68), and social media non-advertising (AOR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.25-2.36) correlated with e-cigarette use. Exposure to traditional media advertisements (β=0.23; 95% CI: 0.08-0.38) and social media non-advertising (β=0.26; 95% CI: 0.09-0.43) correlated with use intentions. Exposure to digital media advertisements (β= -0.32; 95% CI: -0.57 - -0.08), retail setting advertisements (β= -0.30; 95% CI: -0.58 - -0.03), and radio/podcast non-advertising (β= -0.44; 95% CI: -0.84 - -0.03) correlated with lower perceived addictiveness. Radio/podcast non-advertising exposure (β= -0.50; 95% CI: -0.84 - -0.16) correlated with lower perceived harm. However, retail setting advertisement exposure was associated with e-cigarette non-use (AOR=0.61; 95% CI: 0.42-0.87), and traditional media advertisement (β=0.38; 95% CI: 0.15-0.61) and social media non-advertising exposure (β=0.40; 95% CI: 0.14-0.66) correlated with greater perceived addictiveness.

Conclusions: E-cigarette-related promotional content exposure across media platforms impacts perceptions and use, thus warranting regulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国和以色列成年人接触电子烟广告和非广告内容与使用行为和认知的关系
导言:随着电子烟营销策略的多样化,在不同的监管背景下,通过多种媒体渠道研究电子烟广告和非广告内容(例如在社交媒体上)对成年人的影响是很重要的。方法:使用美国(n=1128)和以色列(n=1094) 2222名成年人的2021年横断面数据,多变量回归研究了过去一个月电子烟广告和非广告内容暴露与过去一个月电子烟使用(逻辑回归)以及使用意图和风险认知(线性回归)的关系,控制了社会人口统计学和烟草使用。结果:总体而言,20.3%的受访者表示过去一个月使用过电子烟(美国15.5%,以色列25.2%),46.1%的受访者表示接触过任何广告(28.7%数字媒体,25.2%传统媒体,16.8%零售环境),34.1%的受访者表示接触过任何非广告(19.4%社交媒体,13.6%网站,12.3%电影/电视/剧院,5.8%广播/播客)。接触数字媒体广告(AOR=1.95;95% CI: 1.42-2.66),传统媒体广告(AOR=2.00;95% CI=1.49-2.68),社交媒体非广告(AOR=1.72;95% CI: 1.25-2.36)与电子烟使用相关。传统媒体广告曝光率(β=0.23;95% CI: 0.08-0.38)和社交媒体非广告(β=0.26;95% CI: 0.09-0.43)与使用意图相关。接触数字媒体广告(β= -0.32;95% CI: -0.57 - -0.08),零售背景广告(β= -0.30;95% CI: -0.58 - -0.03),广播/播客非广告(β= -0.44;95% CI: -0.84 - -0.03)与较低的感知成瘾性相关。广播/播客非广告曝光(β= -0.50;95% CI: -0.84 - -0.16)与较低的感知伤害相关。然而,零售环境广告暴露与不使用电子烟相关(AOR=0.61;95% CI: 0.42-0.87),传统媒体广告(β=0.38;95% CI: 0.15-0.61)和社交媒体非广告曝光(β=0.40;95% CI: 0.14-0.66)与更大的感知成瘾性相关。结论:电子烟相关的宣传内容在媒体平台上的曝光会影响人们的认知和使用,因此需要监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
An exploration of attitudes regarding the use of a state tobacco Quitline for smoking cessation among low-income adults with a history of smoking. Erratum: Self-reported smoking status and exhaled carbon monoxide in secondary preventive follow-up after coronary heart events: Do our patients tell the truth? Corrigendum: Associations between vaping and daily cigarette consumption among individuals with psychological distress. Knowledge, attitudes, and referral practices for smokers to a state tobacco quitline in a federally qualified healthcare center: Healthcare provider perspectives. Association between maternal smoking and duration of breastfeeding in very low birth weight preterm infants after discharge from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1