“It wasn't me, check the cameras!” Suspects' apparent verifiable responses might not indicate innocence

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Behavioral Sciences & the Law Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1002/bsl.2639
Ana Isabel Jiménez-González, Jaume Masip, Iris Blandón-Gitlin, Carmen Herrero
{"title":"“It wasn't me, check the cameras!” Suspects' apparent verifiable responses might not indicate innocence","authors":"Ana Isabel Jiménez-González,&nbsp;Jaume Masip,&nbsp;Iris Blandón-Gitlin,&nbsp;Carmen Herrero","doi":"10.1002/bsl.2639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The verifiability of a suspect's alibi is often interpreted as a sign of innocence. Because the police resources are limited, verifiability could be used to dismiss suspects of minor offenses. We examined whether alibi verifiability actually indicates innocence for minor crimes. In Experiment 1, participants imagined they were guilty or innocent suspects of minor crimes and selected a response to convince the police of their innocence. Compared to innocent suspects, guilty suspects were more likely to select pseudo-verifiable responses (which seemed verifiable but were not) rather than non-verifiable responses. Experiment 2 revealed that pseudo-verifiable responses increased observers' perceptions of innocence (rather than guilt). Experiment 3 suggested that people infer the police will not verify alibis of minor crimes, which may lead people to invent pseudo-verifiable responses. These results indicate that apparent verifiability does not necessarily indicate innocence. The police should systematically test alternative hypotheses whenever they encounter apparent verifiable responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bsl.2639","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsl.2639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The verifiability of a suspect's alibi is often interpreted as a sign of innocence. Because the police resources are limited, verifiability could be used to dismiss suspects of minor offenses. We examined whether alibi verifiability actually indicates innocence for minor crimes. In Experiment 1, participants imagined they were guilty or innocent suspects of minor crimes and selected a response to convince the police of their innocence. Compared to innocent suspects, guilty suspects were more likely to select pseudo-verifiable responses (which seemed verifiable but were not) rather than non-verifiable responses. Experiment 2 revealed that pseudo-verifiable responses increased observers' perceptions of innocence (rather than guilt). Experiment 3 suggested that people infer the police will not verify alibis of minor crimes, which may lead people to invent pseudo-verifiable responses. These results indicate that apparent verifiability does not necessarily indicate innocence. The police should systematically test alternative hypotheses whenever they encounter apparent verifiable responses.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“不是我,检查一下摄像机!”嫌疑犯表面上可证实的回答可能并不表明他是无辜的。
嫌疑犯的不在场证明的可查证性常常被解释为无罪的标志。由于警察资源有限,可核查性可用于免除犯有轻微罪行的嫌疑人。我们研究了在轻微犯罪中,不在场证明是否意味着无罪。在实验1中,参与者想象自己是轻微犯罪的有罪或无罪的嫌疑人,并选择一种反应来说服警察他们是无辜的。与无辜的嫌疑人相比,有罪的嫌疑人更倾向于选择伪可验证的反应(看起来可验证,但实际上不是),而不是不可验证的反应。实验2显示,伪可验证的回答增加了观察者对无辜的感知(而不是内疚)。实验3表明,人们推断警察不会核实轻微犯罪的不在场证明,这可能导致人们发明伪可核实的反应。这些结果表明,表面上的可验证性并不一定表明无罪。当警方遇到明显可证实的回应时,他们应该系统地检验不同的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Survey of change-of-venue motions in appellate court transcripts of murder trials (2000-2020): Which factors make a difference? Are risk assessment tools more accurate than unstructured judgments in predicting violent, any, and sexual offending? A meta-analysis of direct comparison studies. Poly-bullying victimisation in Indonesia: Prevalence and factors related to children exposure to multiple bullying incidents, and its correlation to subjective well-being. Issue Information Parental involvement in school and school victimization in Taiwan: The mediating role of quality of student-teacher relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1