Mariana Medina-Córdoba, Sara Cadavid, Angela-Fernanda Espinosa-Aranzales, Karen Aguía-Rojas, Pablo Andrés Bermúdez-Hernández, Daniel-Alejandro Quiroga-Torres, William R. Rodríguez-Dueñas
{"title":"The effect of interprofessional education on the work environment of health professionals: a scoping review","authors":"Mariana Medina-Córdoba, Sara Cadavid, Angela-Fernanda Espinosa-Aranzales, Karen Aguía-Rojas, Pablo Andrés Bermúdez-Hernández, Daniel-Alejandro Quiroga-Torres, William R. Rodríguez-Dueñas","doi":"10.1007/s10459-023-10300-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To explore the existing literature on the effect of Interprofessional Education (IPE) on the work environment of health professionals. The research question was systematized according to the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) format. A scoping review was performed. A search of multiple bibliographic databases identified 407 papers, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria. The populations of the 21 studies reviewed were composed of professionals in the fields of medicine, nursing, psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and social work, among others. The study contexts were both academic and nonacademic hospitals, mental health institutions, and community settings, and the topics examined were organizational climate, organizational culture, organizational attachment and job satisfaction. The findings from the reviewed studies showed positive effects of IPE interventions on organizational climate and culture, but the results on job satisfaction and organizational attachment were mixed (i.e., positive and no effects following IPE interventions). Research on IPE is worth more attention as IPE could be an effective alternative for the fulfillment of the Quadruple Aim and achieving the third of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, aimed at improving health and well-being. It seems critical for IPE to be positioned as a trend in global health, aiming at boosting human health resources as one of its building blocks and calling the attention of health decision-makers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"29 4","pages":"1463 - 1480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-023-10300-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To explore the existing literature on the effect of Interprofessional Education (IPE) on the work environment of health professionals. The research question was systematized according to the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) format. A scoping review was performed. A search of multiple bibliographic databases identified 407 papers, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria. The populations of the 21 studies reviewed were composed of professionals in the fields of medicine, nursing, psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and social work, among others. The study contexts were both academic and nonacademic hospitals, mental health institutions, and community settings, and the topics examined were organizational climate, organizational culture, organizational attachment and job satisfaction. The findings from the reviewed studies showed positive effects of IPE interventions on organizational climate and culture, but the results on job satisfaction and organizational attachment were mixed (i.e., positive and no effects following IPE interventions). Research on IPE is worth more attention as IPE could be an effective alternative for the fulfillment of the Quadruple Aim and achieving the third of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, aimed at improving health and well-being. It seems critical for IPE to be positioned as a trend in global health, aiming at boosting human health resources as one of its building blocks and calling the attention of health decision-makers.
探讨跨专业教育对卫生专业人员工作环境影响的现有文献。根据PCC (Population, Concept, and Context)格式将研究问题系统化。执行了范围审查。在多个文献数据库中检索到407篇论文,其中21篇符合纳入标准。21项研究的人群由医学、护理、心理学、职业治疗、物理治疗和社会工作等领域的专业人员组成。研究背景包括学术和非学术医院、精神卫生机构和社区环境,研究主题包括组织氛围、组织文化、组织依恋和工作满意度。研究结果显示,IPE干预对组织氛围和文化有积极影响,但对工作满意度和组织依恋的影响则是喜忧参半(即,IPE干预对员工有积极影响,对员工没有影响)。IPE的研究更值得关注,因为IPE可以成为实现“四重目标”和实现联合国可持续发展目标的第三个目标的有效替代方案,旨在改善健康和福祉。似乎至关重要的是,应当将国际公共卫生研究定位为全球卫生领域的一种趋势,旨在增加人类卫生资源,使之成为其基石之一,并引起卫生决策者的注意。
期刊介绍:
Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.