Inference on regression model with misclassified binary response

Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jspi.2023.106121
Arindam Chatterjee , Tathagata Bandyopadhyay , Ayoushman Bhattacharya
{"title":"Inference on regression model with misclassified binary response","authors":"Arindam Chatterjee ,&nbsp;Tathagata Bandyopadhyay ,&nbsp;Ayoushman Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2023.106121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Misclassification of binary responses, if ignored, may severely bias the </span>maximum likelihood estimators<span><span> (MLEs) of regression parameters<span>. For such data, a binary regression model incorporating non-differential classification errors is extensively used by researchers in different application contexts. We strongly caution against indiscriminate use of this model considering the fact that it suffers from a serious estimation problem due to confounding of the unknown misclassification </span></span>probabilities<span><span> with the regression parameters, and thus, may lead to a highly biased estimate. To overcome this problem, we propose here the use of an internal validation sample in addition to the main sample. Assuming differential classification errors, we consider MLEs of the regression parameters based on the joint likelihood of the main sample and the internal validation sample. We then develop a rigorous asymptotic theory for the joint MLEs under standard assumptions. To facilitate its easy implementation for inference, we propose a bootstrap approximation to the </span>asymptotic distribution and prove its consistency. The results of the simulation studies suggest that even an extremely small validation sample may lead to a vastly improved inference. Finally, the methodology is illustrated with a real-life survey data.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378375823000903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Misclassification of binary responses, if ignored, may severely bias the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of regression parameters. For such data, a binary regression model incorporating non-differential classification errors is extensively used by researchers in different application contexts. We strongly caution against indiscriminate use of this model considering the fact that it suffers from a serious estimation problem due to confounding of the unknown misclassification probabilities with the regression parameters, and thus, may lead to a highly biased estimate. To overcome this problem, we propose here the use of an internal validation sample in addition to the main sample. Assuming differential classification errors, we consider MLEs of the regression parameters based on the joint likelihood of the main sample and the internal validation sample. We then develop a rigorous asymptotic theory for the joint MLEs under standard assumptions. To facilitate its easy implementation for inference, we propose a bootstrap approximation to the asymptotic distribution and prove its consistency. The results of the simulation studies suggest that even an extremely small validation sample may lead to a vastly improved inference. Finally, the methodology is illustrated with a real-life survey data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
二元响应分类错误的回归模型推理
如果忽略二元响应的错误分类,可能会严重影响回归参数的最大似然估计(MLEs)。对于这类数据,研究人员在不同的应用环境中广泛使用了包含非微分分类误差的二元回归模型。考虑到由于未知的错误分类概率与回归参数的混淆,该模型存在严重的估计问题,因此可能导致高度偏倚的估计,我们强烈警告不要滥用该模型。为了克服这个问题,我们建议在主样本之外使用一个内部验证样本。假设分类误差存在差异,我们基于主样本和内部验证样本的联合似然来考虑回归参数的最大似然。然后,在标准假设条件下,我们对联合最大似然矩建立了严格的渐近理论。为了便于推理的实现,我们提出了渐近分布的自举近似,并证明了其一致性。模拟研究的结果表明,即使是极小的验证样本也可能导致大大改进的推理。最后,用实际调查数据说明了该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1