Penetrating intracranial injury through temporal bone with a retained stab: A case report and literature review

Endris Hussen Ali MD, NEUROSURGERY RESIDENT , Milena Gebreegziabher Haile MD, NEUROSURGEON
{"title":"Penetrating intracranial injury through temporal bone with a retained stab: A case report and literature review","authors":"Endris Hussen Ali MD, NEUROSURGERY RESIDENT ,&nbsp;Milena Gebreegziabher Haile MD, NEUROSURGEON","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2023.101930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An instrument that penetrates the dura mater and the thickness of the skull bone is considered to have produced a penetrating craniocerebral injury. Nonmissile penetrants and missiles are two types of penetrating agents. Nonmissile penetrants can travel at low speeds or at high speeds (&gt;100 m/s). It might stay inside the skull or come out of another place. One item that can inflict piercing injuries on civilians is a knife. Although the precise frequency of penetrating head injuries in the general population is unknown, current estimates suggest that bullets account for 4.6 % of these injuries, while puncture wounds from stabs, nails, and other trauma account for 0.4 %. Unlike European reports, Reportedly, male assailants in South Africa are much more likely to have suffered a single head-stab wound. The frontal bone is the most frontal, thickest, and most accessible section of the skull for assailants; nevertheless, the orbit and squamous portion of the temporal bone are thinner, more fragile, and more appealing to skilled attackers.</p></div><div><h3>Case presentation</h3><p>This is a 29-year-old male patient referred to our hospital after being referred from the primary hospital. He sustained a stab injury to the left temporal area of the head, bleeding from the scalp, and loss of consciousness. The stab is retained in the brain, with its tip visible in the left temporal area (<span>Fig. 1</span>). GCS is 10/15; the pupils are midsized and non-reactive bilaterally, and he had a left-side preference. On a brain CT scan, there is a left temporal area foreign body seen penetrating through the scalp, skull temporal bone, temporal lobe, and occipital lobe of the brain with a stab tip at the edge of the left tentorium cerebelli, and there is an associated left massive acute subdural hematoma and intraventricular hemorrhage extending from the lateral ventricle to the fourth ventricle (<span>Fig. 2</span>). We did left-side decompressive craniectomy, expansile duraplasty, and removed a foreign body (stab) safely (<span>Fig. 3</span>), and postoperatively, the patient was discharged with stable vital signs and no neurologic deficit with improved GCS 15/15.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The main idea is to wait to remove the knife until after a thorough investigation has been completed and the interdisciplinary team is ready to remove the instrument using suitable techniques. Removing the penetrating object should allow the knife to follow its original path. It’s important to avoid making any rocking motions during the extraction process that could endanger vital neurovascular structures at risk at the knife's tip.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 101930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475192300213X/pdfft?md5=dec9ae1ef69c74f078233b55fa1083e9&pid=1-s2.0-S221475192300213X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475192300213X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

An instrument that penetrates the dura mater and the thickness of the skull bone is considered to have produced a penetrating craniocerebral injury. Nonmissile penetrants and missiles are two types of penetrating agents. Nonmissile penetrants can travel at low speeds or at high speeds (>100 m/s). It might stay inside the skull or come out of another place. One item that can inflict piercing injuries on civilians is a knife. Although the precise frequency of penetrating head injuries in the general population is unknown, current estimates suggest that bullets account for 4.6 % of these injuries, while puncture wounds from stabs, nails, and other trauma account for 0.4 %. Unlike European reports, Reportedly, male assailants in South Africa are much more likely to have suffered a single head-stab wound. The frontal bone is the most frontal, thickest, and most accessible section of the skull for assailants; nevertheless, the orbit and squamous portion of the temporal bone are thinner, more fragile, and more appealing to skilled attackers.

Case presentation

This is a 29-year-old male patient referred to our hospital after being referred from the primary hospital. He sustained a stab injury to the left temporal area of the head, bleeding from the scalp, and loss of consciousness. The stab is retained in the brain, with its tip visible in the left temporal area (Fig. 1). GCS is 10/15; the pupils are midsized and non-reactive bilaterally, and he had a left-side preference. On a brain CT scan, there is a left temporal area foreign body seen penetrating through the scalp, skull temporal bone, temporal lobe, and occipital lobe of the brain with a stab tip at the edge of the left tentorium cerebelli, and there is an associated left massive acute subdural hematoma and intraventricular hemorrhage extending from the lateral ventricle to the fourth ventricle (Fig. 2). We did left-side decompressive craniectomy, expansile duraplasty, and removed a foreign body (stab) safely (Fig. 3), and postoperatively, the patient was discharged with stable vital signs and no neurologic deficit with improved GCS 15/15.

Conclusion

The main idea is to wait to remove the knife until after a thorough investigation has been completed and the interdisciplinary team is ready to remove the instrument using suitable techniques. Removing the penetrating object should allow the knife to follow its original path. It’s important to avoid making any rocking motions during the extraction process that could endanger vital neurovascular structures at risk at the knife's tip.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颞骨穿透性颅内损伤伴残留刺伤1例报告并文献复习
穿透硬脑膜和颅骨厚度的器械被认为造成了穿透性颅脑损伤。非导弹渗透剂和导弹是两种类型的渗透剂。非导弹渗透物能以低速或高速(100米/秒)行进。它可能会留在头骨内或从其他地方出来。有一种物品可以对平民造成刺穿性伤害,那就是刀。虽然一般人群中穿透性头部损伤的确切频率尚不清楚,但目前的估计表明,子弹占这些损伤的4.6%,而刺伤、钉子和其他创伤的刺伤占0.4%。与欧洲的报道不同,据报道,南非的男性袭击者更有可能只有一处头部刺伤。额骨是攻击者最正面、最厚、最容易接近的头骨部分;然而,颞骨的眼眶和鳞状部分更薄,更脆弱,更吸引熟练的攻击者。病例介绍:这是一名29岁男性患者,由基层医院转诊至我院。他头部左侧颞区被刺伤,头皮出血,失去知觉。刺伤留在大脑中,其尖端在左侧颞区可见(图1)。GCS为10/15;瞳孔大小中等,双侧无反应,患者偏左。在脑部CT扫描中,可见左侧颞区异物穿透头皮、颅骨颞骨、颞叶和枕叶,其尖端位于左侧小脑幕边缘,并伴有左侧大量急性硬膜下血肿和脑室内出血,从侧脑室延伸至第四脑室(图2)。我们进行了左侧减压颅骨切除术,扩张硬脑膜成形术,安全取出异物(刺)(图3),术后出院,患者生命体征稳定,无神经功能缺损,GCS 15/15改善。结论主要的想法是等到彻底的调查完成,跨学科团队准备好使用合适的技术取出仪器后再取出刀。移开刺穿的物体应该让刀沿着原来的路径移动。在拔牙过程中,一定要避免晃动,以免危及刀尖处的重要神经血管结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Restorative neurostimulation for chronic low back pain using ReActiv8® in a patient with a large lumbar disc herniation Topical dexamethason effectiveness combined with surgical intervention in patients suffering from chronic subdural hematoma Cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cyst presenting with only trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective study at the single-center in Vietnam Teta injury at the craniovertebral junction: A case report Clinical characteristics and management of vertebral artery dissection without definitive imaging features: A single center cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1