Predicting the radiological outcome of cerebral aneurysm treatment with machine learning algorithms; a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

Mohammad Amin Habibi , Hanieh Amani , Mohammad Sina Mirjani , Ayoob Molla
{"title":"Predicting the radiological outcome of cerebral aneurysm treatment with machine learning algorithms; a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis","authors":"Mohammad Amin Habibi ,&nbsp;Hanieh Amani ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sina Mirjani ,&nbsp;Ayoob Molla","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2023.101929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Up now, several model were proposed for predicting the outcome of treating brain aneurysm. This study aims to investigate the performance of Machine learning (ML) in predicting the outcome of intracranial aneurysm after endovascular or microsurgical management.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis was prepared with adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The electronic databases of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed up to 5th June 2023. All statistical analysis was done by STATA/mp V.20.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Recent studies have utilized ML models to forecast the results of cerebral aneurysm treatment. The models exhibit a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.80, with the latter revealing substantial variability across the various studies. Meanwhile, the sensitivity remained consistent. The models displayed a positive DLR (PLR) of 4.5 and a negative DLR (NLR) of 0.15. The aggregate diagnostic score determined that heterogeneity was negligible, with a value of 3.41. However, the diagnostic odds ratio 30.29 indicated noteworthy heterogeneity among the studies. The pooled AUC of 0.90 showcased the ML's ability to predict cerebral aneurysm treatment outcomes accurately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Predicting treatment outcomes in patients with intracranial aneurysms non-invasively is a promising approach with good diagnostic performance. However, further studies are required to improve the accuracy of ML algorithms, as the pooled metrics had a wide confidence interval. This will not only enhance the reliability of the predictions but also facilitate the integration of these algorithms into daily clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 101929"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923002128/pdfft?md5=d29cd4384c5f10ad4b72938f45036e0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2214751923002128-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923002128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Up now, several model were proposed for predicting the outcome of treating brain aneurysm. This study aims to investigate the performance of Machine learning (ML) in predicting the outcome of intracranial aneurysm after endovascular or microsurgical management.

Method

This systematic review and meta-analysis was prepared with adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The electronic databases of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed up to 5th June 2023. All statistical analysis was done by STATA/mp V.20.

Results

Recent studies have utilized ML models to forecast the results of cerebral aneurysm treatment. The models exhibit a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.80, with the latter revealing substantial variability across the various studies. Meanwhile, the sensitivity remained consistent. The models displayed a positive DLR (PLR) of 4.5 and a negative DLR (NLR) of 0.15. The aggregate diagnostic score determined that heterogeneity was negligible, with a value of 3.41. However, the diagnostic odds ratio 30.29 indicated noteworthy heterogeneity among the studies. The pooled AUC of 0.90 showcased the ML's ability to predict cerebral aneurysm treatment outcomes accurately.

Conclusion

Predicting treatment outcomes in patients with intracranial aneurysms non-invasively is a promising approach with good diagnostic performance. However, further studies are required to improve the accuracy of ML algorithms, as the pooled metrics had a wide confidence interval. This will not only enhance the reliability of the predictions but also facilitate the integration of these algorithms into daily clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用机器学习算法预测脑动脉瘤治疗的放射预后系统回顾和诊断荟萃分析
目前,已经提出了几种预测脑动脉瘤治疗结果的模型。本研究旨在探讨机器学习(ML)在预测颅内动脉瘤在血管内或显微手术治疗后的预后方面的表现。方法遵循PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。截止到2023年6月5日,对PubMed/Medline、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science等电子数据库进行系统综述。所有统计分析均采用STATA/mp V.20进行。结果近年来已有研究利用ML模型预测脑动脉瘤治疗结果。该模型的敏感性为0.88,特异性为0.80,后者揭示了各种研究之间的实质性差异。同时,敏感性保持一致。模型的阳性DLR (PLR)为4.5,阴性DLR (NLR)为0.15。综合诊断评分表明异质性可以忽略不计,其值为3.41。然而,诊断优势比为30.29,表明研究之间存在显著的异质性。合并的AUC为0.90,表明ML能够准确预测脑动脉瘤的治疗结果。结论无创预测颅内动脉瘤治疗效果是一种有前景的方法,具有良好的诊断效果。然而,由于汇集的指标具有较宽的置信区间,因此需要进一步的研究来提高ML算法的准确性。这不仅将提高预测的可靠性,而且有助于将这些算法整合到日常临床实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Restorative neurostimulation for chronic low back pain using ReActiv8® in a patient with a large lumbar disc herniation Topical dexamethason effectiveness combined with surgical intervention in patients suffering from chronic subdural hematoma Cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cyst presenting with only trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective study at the single-center in Vietnam Teta injury at the craniovertebral junction: A case report Clinical characteristics and management of vertebral artery dissection without definitive imaging features: A single center cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1