Utilizing geometric morphometrics to investigate gene function during organ growth: Insights through the study of beetle horn shape allometry

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q2 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY Evolution & Development Pub Date : 2023-12-02 DOI:10.1111/ede.12464
Patrick T. Rohner, Yonggang Hu, Armin P. Moczek
{"title":"Utilizing geometric morphometrics to investigate gene function during organ growth: Insights through the study of beetle horn shape allometry","authors":"Patrick T. Rohner,&nbsp;Yonggang Hu,&nbsp;Armin P. Moczek","doi":"10.1111/ede.12464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Static allometry is a major component of morphological variation. Much of the literature on the development of allometry investigates how functional perturbations of diverse pathways affect the relationship between trait size and body size. Often, this is done with the explicit objective to identify developmental mechanisms that enable the sensing of organ size and the regulation of relative growth. However, changes in relative trait size can also be brought about by a range of other distinctly different developmental processes, such as changes in patterning or tissue folding, yet standard univariate biometric approaches are usually unable to distinguish among alternative explanations. Here, we utilize geometric morphometrics to investigate the degree to which functional genetic manipulations known to affect the <i>size</i> of dung beetle horns also recapitulate the effect of horn <i>shape</i> allometry. We reasoned that the knockdown phenotypes of pathways governing relative growth should closely resemble shape variation induced by natural allometric variation. In contrast, we predicted that if genes primarily affect alternative developmental processes, knockdown effects should align poorly with shape allometry. We find that the knockdown effects of several genes (e.g., <i>doublesex, Foxo</i>) indeed closely aligned with shape allometry, indicating that their corresponding pathways may indeed function primarily in the regulation of relative trait growth. In contrast, other knockdown effects (e.g., <i>Distal-less</i>, <i>dachs</i>) failed to align with allometry, implicating these pathways in potentially scaling-independent processes. Our findings moderate the interpretation of studies focusing on trait length and highlight the usefulness of multivariate approaches to study allometry and phenotypic plasticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12083,"journal":{"name":"Evolution & Development","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ede.12464","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution & Development","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ede.12464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Static allometry is a major component of morphological variation. Much of the literature on the development of allometry investigates how functional perturbations of diverse pathways affect the relationship between trait size and body size. Often, this is done with the explicit objective to identify developmental mechanisms that enable the sensing of organ size and the regulation of relative growth. However, changes in relative trait size can also be brought about by a range of other distinctly different developmental processes, such as changes in patterning or tissue folding, yet standard univariate biometric approaches are usually unable to distinguish among alternative explanations. Here, we utilize geometric morphometrics to investigate the degree to which functional genetic manipulations known to affect the size of dung beetle horns also recapitulate the effect of horn shape allometry. We reasoned that the knockdown phenotypes of pathways governing relative growth should closely resemble shape variation induced by natural allometric variation. In contrast, we predicted that if genes primarily affect alternative developmental processes, knockdown effects should align poorly with shape allometry. We find that the knockdown effects of several genes (e.g., doublesex, Foxo) indeed closely aligned with shape allometry, indicating that their corresponding pathways may indeed function primarily in the regulation of relative trait growth. In contrast, other knockdown effects (e.g., Distal-less, dachs) failed to align with allometry, implicating these pathways in potentially scaling-independent processes. Our findings moderate the interpretation of studies focusing on trait length and highlight the usefulness of multivariate approaches to study allometry and phenotypic plasticity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用几何形态计量学研究器官生长过程中的基因功能:通过甲虫角形状异速学研究的见解。
静态异速生长是形态变异的主要组成部分。许多关于异速发育的文献研究了不同途径的功能扰动如何影响性状大小和体型之间的关系。通常,这样做的明确目的是确定能够感知器官大小和调节相对生长的发育机制。然而,相对性状大小的变化也可以由一系列其他明显不同的发育过程引起,例如模式或组织折叠的变化,然而标准的单变量生物计量方法通常无法区分不同的解释。在这里,我们利用几何形态计量学来研究已知的影响屎壳郎角大小的功能性基因操作在多大程度上也概括了角形状异速的影响。我们推断,控制相对生长的途径的敲低表型应该与自然异速变异引起的形状变异非常相似。相反,我们预测,如果基因主要影响替代发育过程,敲低效应应该与形状异速发育不一致。我们发现,一些基因(如双性、Foxo)的敲低效应确实与形状异速发育密切相关,这表明它们相应的途径可能确实在相对性状生长的调控中起主要作用。相比之下,其他敲低效应(例如,远端无,dachs)未能与异速生长对齐,暗示这些通路可能与标度无关。我们的研究结果缓和了关注性状长度的研究的解释,并强调了研究异速生长和表型可塑性的多变量方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution & Development
Evolution & Development 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolution & Development serves as a voice for the rapidly growing research community at the interface of evolutionary and developmental biology. The exciting re-integration of these two fields, after almost a century''s separation, holds much promise as the focus of a broader synthesis of biological thought. Evolution & Development publishes works that address the evolution/development interface from a diversity of angles. The journal welcomes papers from paleontologists, population biologists, developmental biologists, and molecular biologists, but also encourages submissions from professionals in other fields where relevant research is being carried out, from mathematics to the history and philosophy of science.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Front cover From two segments and beyond: Investigating the onset of regeneration in Syllis malaquini Issue information A new motile animal with implications for the evolution of axial polarity from the Ediacaran of South Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1