Assessing the carbon footprint in dairy cattle farms in the northern temperate region of Spain

Gregorio Salcedo Díaz , Pilar Merino Pereda , Daniel Salcedo-Rodríguez
{"title":"Assessing the carbon footprint in dairy cattle farms in the northern temperate region of Spain","authors":"Gregorio Salcedo Díaz ,&nbsp;Pilar Merino Pereda ,&nbsp;Daniel Salcedo-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The availability of models constitutes a key factor when selecting a decision support tool aimed at improving the production and environmental aspects of farms. There is a need for robust models that are user-friendly, facilitating the estimation of farm emissions and the analysis of their temporal fluctuations. The objectives of this study were i) to calculate both the partial (PCF) and total carbon (TCF) footprints of 212 dairy farms, distinguishing those with and without maize cultivation; ii) to identify critical variables related to feed, nutrition, productivity and environmental efficiency; and iii) to formulate and validate prediction equations based on available data from dairy farms. The database encompasses information from 212 dairy cattle farms situated in the temperate-humid zone of northern Spain, spanning the period from 2014 to 2018. Farm classification was based on the presence (CcMz) or absence (ScCMz) of maize cultivation for silage production, resulting in 96 farms in the CcMz category and 116 farms in the ScCMz category.</p><p>Among the variables considered, the variable herd N-use efficiency (NUE<sub>CR</sub>) for (PCF) showed the lowest root mean square error of prediction at 0.39% and the correspondingly lowest root men. The root mean squared percentage error (RMSPE): standard deviation ratio (RSR) at 0.52. In the case of total carbon footprint (TCF), herd N-use efficiency (NUE<sub>CR</sub>) again showed the lowest root mean square error of prediction at 0.52%. Regarding TCF, herd feed efficiency (EA<sub>CR</sub>) was the variable with the lowest both RMSPE and RSR, with 0.65 and 0.64, respectively. Consequently, the estimation of the PCF and TCF of 1 ​kg of milk from the temperate-humid zone of northern Spain at the farm gate can be feasibly accomplished utilizing NUE<sub>CR</sub> and EA<sub>CR,</sub> respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000606/pdfft?md5=60dc565fafdbdcb13530c973841b2434&pid=1-s2.0-S2949911923000606-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The availability of models constitutes a key factor when selecting a decision support tool aimed at improving the production and environmental aspects of farms. There is a need for robust models that are user-friendly, facilitating the estimation of farm emissions and the analysis of their temporal fluctuations. The objectives of this study were i) to calculate both the partial (PCF) and total carbon (TCF) footprints of 212 dairy farms, distinguishing those with and without maize cultivation; ii) to identify critical variables related to feed, nutrition, productivity and environmental efficiency; and iii) to formulate and validate prediction equations based on available data from dairy farms. The database encompasses information from 212 dairy cattle farms situated in the temperate-humid zone of northern Spain, spanning the period from 2014 to 2018. Farm classification was based on the presence (CcMz) or absence (ScCMz) of maize cultivation for silage production, resulting in 96 farms in the CcMz category and 116 farms in the ScCMz category.

Among the variables considered, the variable herd N-use efficiency (NUECR) for (PCF) showed the lowest root mean square error of prediction at 0.39% and the correspondingly lowest root men. The root mean squared percentage error (RMSPE): standard deviation ratio (RSR) at 0.52. In the case of total carbon footprint (TCF), herd N-use efficiency (NUECR) again showed the lowest root mean square error of prediction at 0.52%. Regarding TCF, herd feed efficiency (EACR) was the variable with the lowest both RMSPE and RSR, with 0.65 and 0.64, respectively. Consequently, the estimation of the PCF and TCF of 1 ​kg of milk from the temperate-humid zone of northern Spain at the farm gate can be feasibly accomplished utilizing NUECR and EACR, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估西班牙北温带地区奶牛养殖场的碳足迹
在选择旨在改善农场生产和环境方面的决策支持工具时,模型的可用性是一个关键因素。有必要建立对用户友好的可靠模型,以促进对农场排放的估计和对其时间波动的分析。本研究的目的是:(1)计算212个奶牛场的部分碳足迹(PCF)和总碳足迹(TCF),区分种植玉米和不种植玉米的奶牛场;Ii)确定与饲料、营养、生产力和环境效率有关的关键变量;iii)根据奶牛场的现有数据制定并验证预测方程。该数据库涵盖了2014年至2018年期间位于西班牙北部温带湿润地区的212个奶牛场的信息。农场分类是基于青贮生产玉米种植的存在(CcMz)或不存在(ScCMz),导致96个农场属于CcMz类别,116个农场属于ScCMz类别。在考虑的变量中,(PCF)的变量群氮利用效率(NUECR)的预测均方根误差最低,为0.39%,相应的根误差最低。均方根百分比误差(RMSPE):标准偏差比(RSR)为0.52。在总碳足迹(TCF)的情况下,畜群氮利用效率(NUECR)的预测均方根误差也最低,为0.52%。在TCF方面,兽群饲料效率(EACR)的RMSPE和RSR最低,分别为0.65和0.64。因此,分别利用NUECR和EACR估算西班牙北部温带湿润地区1 kg牛奶的PCF和TCF是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the performance of biobased, recovered nitrogen fertilizers in European cropping systems using modelling Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia How has scientific literature addressed crop planning at farm level: A bibliometric-qualitative review Spatiotemporal variation of crop diversification across Eastern Indo Gangetic plains of South Asia Perennial rice – An alternative to the ‘one-sow, one-harvest’ rice production: Benefits, challenges, and future prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1