Exploring stigmatizing perceptions of dementia among racialized groups living in the Anglosphere: A scoping review

George Philip , Marie Y. Savundranayagam , Anita Kothari , Joseph B. Orange
{"title":"Exploring stigmatizing perceptions of dementia among racialized groups living in the Anglosphere: A scoping review","authors":"George Philip ,&nbsp;Marie Y. Savundranayagam ,&nbsp;Anita Kothari ,&nbsp;Joseph B. Orange","doi":"10.1016/j.ahr.2023.100170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A prominent gap exists in understanding stigma among racialized persons living with dementia, care partners, and community. A scoping review was conducted to explore stigmatizing perceptions of dementia among racialized groups living in Anglosphere countries. Eligible studies focused on dementia and stigma, and reported data on racialized groups (i.e., Black, Hispanic, South Asian, East Asian, Middle Eastern) living in Anglosphere countries (i.e., Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand). All publication dates were included. Eligible studies were published in English. Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline(Ovid), EMBASE databases were searched in November 2022. Data extraction and thematic analysis was performed on eligible studies using Corrigan's Model of Stigma. Themes were categorized into stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination. Thirty-six studies were included. Themes aligning with stereotypes included derogatory and unpredictable labels, religious beliefs and mysticism toward dementia, and associating dementia with other diseases. Themes aligning with prejudices included shame or embarrassment of dementia. Themes aligning with discrimination included discouragement in help-seeking and isolation, and lack of social acceptance. Stigmatizing perceptions of dementia among racialized communities may delay diagnosis, treatment, and participation in support programs. Future studies must aim to educate and promote dementia awareness among racialized groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72129,"journal":{"name":"Aging and health research","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032123000549/pdfft?md5=3fabebe942971c5ab9941836653c7910&pid=1-s2.0-S2667032123000549-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032123000549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A prominent gap exists in understanding stigma among racialized persons living with dementia, care partners, and community. A scoping review was conducted to explore stigmatizing perceptions of dementia among racialized groups living in Anglosphere countries. Eligible studies focused on dementia and stigma, and reported data on racialized groups (i.e., Black, Hispanic, South Asian, East Asian, Middle Eastern) living in Anglosphere countries (i.e., Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand). All publication dates were included. Eligible studies were published in English. Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline(Ovid), EMBASE databases were searched in November 2022. Data extraction and thematic analysis was performed on eligible studies using Corrigan's Model of Stigma. Themes were categorized into stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination. Thirty-six studies were included. Themes aligning with stereotypes included derogatory and unpredictable labels, religious beliefs and mysticism toward dementia, and associating dementia with other diseases. Themes aligning with prejudices included shame or embarrassment of dementia. Themes aligning with discrimination included discouragement in help-seeking and isolation, and lack of social acceptance. Stigmatizing perceptions of dementia among racialized communities may delay diagnosis, treatment, and participation in support programs. Future studies must aim to educate and promote dementia awareness among racialized groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索生活在英语圈的种族化群体对痴呆症的污名化看法:范围审查
在理解种族化的痴呆症患者、护理伙伴和社区之间的耻辱感方面存在显著差距。进行了一项范围审查,以探讨生活在英语圈国家的种族化群体对痴呆症的污名化看法。符合条件的研究侧重于痴呆症和耻辱感,并报告了生活在英语圈国家(即加拿大、美国、英国、爱尔兰、澳大利亚、新西兰)的种族化群体(即黑人、西班牙裔、南亚、东亚、中东)的数据。所有的出版日期都包括在内。符合条件的研究以英文发表。Scopus、CINAHL、PubMed、PsycINFO、Medline(Ovid)、EMBASE数据库于2022年11月检索。采用Corrigan's Model of Stigma对符合条件的研究进行数据提取和专题分析。主题分为刻板印象、偏见和歧视。纳入了36项研究。与刻板印象一致的主题包括贬损和不可预测的标签,对痴呆症的宗教信仰和神秘主义,以及将痴呆症与其他疾病联系起来。与偏见一致的主题包括痴呆症的羞耻或尴尬。与歧视相一致的主题包括不愿寻求帮助和孤立,以及缺乏社会接受。在种族化的社区中,对痴呆症的污名化看法可能会延迟诊断、治疗和参与支持计划。未来的研究必须旨在教育和促进种族群体对痴呆症的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aging and health research
Aging and health research Clinical Neurology, Public Health and Health Policy, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A double-edged sword: Exploring the neuroprotective/damaging mechanisms of complement activation in Alzheimer's disease Errata regarding missing Editor Disclosure statements in previously published articles Exploring Alzheimer’s disease perceptions among Korean Americans through an online community: A text mining approach Does body mass index predict changes in body composition and metabolic markers in response to testosterone therapy? Health perceptions and behaviors among aging same-gender Kazakh ethnic minority siblings in rural and urban Xinjiang, China: The impact of migration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1