Georgios Bertsatos , Nicholas Tsounis , George Agiomirgianakis
{"title":"Handling asymmetries in the trade balance","authors":"Georgios Bertsatos , Nicholas Tsounis , George Agiomirgianakis","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The existing literature in the US-Mexico trade balance reports mixed evidence on the effects of exchange rate shocks. In this paper we propose a new approach of studying exchange rate effects that allows for asymmetries in the balance of trade. Our results show that using either linear modelling or non-linear modelling and zero threshold, there is no evidence of co-integration for the US-Mexico trade. However, using a quantile analysis and median threshold, for the first time in the literature on trade balance, we obtain evidence of co-integration. Indeed, our findings show the existence of a long-run relation between the trade balance and its determinants except for periods of significant deficits, where the trade balance is detached from underlying fundamentals and follows a random walk. A USD depreciation, especially a small one, is effective in the short run in improving the trade balance, while in the long run, any depreciation worsens the trade balance. These findings hold due to the complementarity of the US and Mexican economies and the change in the structure of the Mexican economy towards higher value-added products that have led to income effects outweighing in the long run, any intending short-run effects, of exchange rate depreciation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"78 1","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944323000625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The existing literature in the US-Mexico trade balance reports mixed evidence on the effects of exchange rate shocks. In this paper we propose a new approach of studying exchange rate effects that allows for asymmetries in the balance of trade. Our results show that using either linear modelling or non-linear modelling and zero threshold, there is no evidence of co-integration for the US-Mexico trade. However, using a quantile analysis and median threshold, for the first time in the literature on trade balance, we obtain evidence of co-integration. Indeed, our findings show the existence of a long-run relation between the trade balance and its determinants except for periods of significant deficits, where the trade balance is detached from underlying fundamentals and follows a random walk. A USD depreciation, especially a small one, is effective in the short run in improving the trade balance, while in the long run, any depreciation worsens the trade balance. These findings hold due to the complementarity of the US and Mexican economies and the change in the structure of the Mexican economy towards higher value-added products that have led to income effects outweighing in the long run, any intending short-run effects, of exchange rate depreciation.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.