Handling asymmetries in the trade balance

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS Research in Economics Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.rie.2023.11.001
Georgios Bertsatos , Nicholas Tsounis , George Agiomirgianakis
{"title":"Handling asymmetries in the trade balance","authors":"Georgios Bertsatos ,&nbsp;Nicholas Tsounis ,&nbsp;George Agiomirgianakis","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The existing literature in the US-Mexico trade balance reports mixed evidence on the effects of exchange rate shocks. In this paper we propose a new approach of studying exchange rate effects that allows for asymmetries in the balance of trade. Our results show that using either linear modelling or non-linear modelling and zero threshold, there is no evidence of co-integration for the US-Mexico trade. However, using a quantile analysis and median threshold, for the first time in the literature on trade balance, we obtain evidence of co-integration. Indeed, our findings show the existence of a long-run relation between the trade balance and its determinants except for periods of significant deficits, where the trade balance is detached from underlying fundamentals and follows a random walk. A USD depreciation, especially a small one, is effective in the short run in improving the trade balance, while in the long run, any depreciation worsens the trade balance. These findings hold due to the complementarity of the US and Mexican economies and the change in the structure of the Mexican economy towards higher value-added products that have led to income effects outweighing in the long run, any intending short-run effects, of exchange rate depreciation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"78 1","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944323000625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing literature in the US-Mexico trade balance reports mixed evidence on the effects of exchange rate shocks. In this paper we propose a new approach of studying exchange rate effects that allows for asymmetries in the balance of trade. Our results show that using either linear modelling or non-linear modelling and zero threshold, there is no evidence of co-integration for the US-Mexico trade. However, using a quantile analysis and median threshold, for the first time in the literature on trade balance, we obtain evidence of co-integration. Indeed, our findings show the existence of a long-run relation between the trade balance and its determinants except for periods of significant deficits, where the trade balance is detached from underlying fundamentals and follows a random walk. A USD depreciation, especially a small one, is effective in the short run in improving the trade balance, while in the long run, any depreciation worsens the trade balance. These findings hold due to the complementarity of the US and Mexican economies and the change in the structure of the Mexican economy towards higher value-added products that have led to income effects outweighing in the long run, any intending short-run effects, of exchange rate depreciation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处理贸易平衡的不对称
关于美墨贸易平衡的现有文献报告了汇率冲击影响的混合证据。在本文中,我们提出了一种研究汇率影响的新方法,该方法考虑了贸易平衡中的不对称性。我们的结果表明,无论是使用线性模型还是非线性模型和零阈值,都没有证据表明美墨贸易存在协整。然而,使用分位数分析和中位数阈值,我们首次在贸易平衡的文献中获得协整的证据。事实上,我们的研究结果表明,贸易平衡与其决定因素之间存在长期关系,但重大赤字时期除外,在这些时期,贸易平衡与基本基本面脱节,并遵循随机游走。美元贬值,尤其是小幅贬值,在短期内对改善贸易平衡是有效的,而从长期来看,任何贬值都会使贸易平衡恶化。这些发现之所以成立,是因为美国和墨西哥经济的互补性,以及墨西哥经济结构向高附加值产品的转变,导致收入效应在长期内超过了汇率贬值的任何有意的短期效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
89 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.
期刊最新文献
Bulkiness of goods and the gravity of international trade: Differential impact of trade barriers Oil Price and Long-run Economic Growth in Oil-importing Developing Countries Foreign aid and inequality: Do conflicts matter? The macroeconomic effects of productivity shocks: Predictions of conventional business cycle models are not always incompatible with SSA economies An inquiry into the causes of income differences among high-income countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1