In the eye of the beholder: Stakeholder perceived value in sustainable business models

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Long Range Planning Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102406
Simon Norris
{"title":"In the eye of the beholder: Stakeholder perceived value in sustainable business models","authors":"Simon Norris","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The sustainability of business models is commonly determined by their value creation for a wide range of stakeholders. This value is primarily conceptualised through the aggregated macro-level Triple Bottom Line (TBL) dimensions of social, ecological and economic value. However, few business model studies provide an explanation as to why and how stakeholders see such value in a business model. A <em>problematising review</em> reveals a conflation of the TBL macro-level and stakeholder micro-level of analysis, causing ambiguity regarding contents and recipients of value. This paper adopts a <em>perceived value</em> concept based on micro-level insights from recipient-centric (strategic) management to reform the construct of ecological, social and economic value. The relationships between value perceptions, need fulfilment and need satisfiers are analysed based on the characteristics of <em>subjectivity</em> and <em>heterogeneity</em>, <em>one-sidedness</em> and <em>non-linearity</em>, <em>situation-specificity</em> and <em>transience, spill-over, relationality</em> and <em>experientiality</em>, <em>idiosyncrasy</em>, <em>incommensurability</em>, and <em>interdependence</em>. The analysis underscores a value creation theory based on stakeholder perceptions of need fulfilment. It suggests stakeholder value creation can only be understood through the stakeholders whose needs are being satisfied. The suggested distinction between needs and satisfiers remedies their conflation in previous research and enables a discussion of conditions for <em>sustainable</em> stakeholder value creation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630123001139/pdfft?md5=f0977a54eb3f1bc160883a3500d02344&pid=1-s2.0-S0024630123001139-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Long Range Planning","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630123001139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sustainability of business models is commonly determined by their value creation for a wide range of stakeholders. This value is primarily conceptualised through the aggregated macro-level Triple Bottom Line (TBL) dimensions of social, ecological and economic value. However, few business model studies provide an explanation as to why and how stakeholders see such value in a business model. A problematising review reveals a conflation of the TBL macro-level and stakeholder micro-level of analysis, causing ambiguity regarding contents and recipients of value. This paper adopts a perceived value concept based on micro-level insights from recipient-centric (strategic) management to reform the construct of ecological, social and economic value. The relationships between value perceptions, need fulfilment and need satisfiers are analysed based on the characteristics of subjectivity and heterogeneity, one-sidedness and non-linearity, situation-specificity and transience, spill-over, relationality and experientiality, idiosyncrasy, incommensurability, and interdependence. The analysis underscores a value creation theory based on stakeholder perceptions of need fulfilment. It suggests stakeholder value creation can only be understood through the stakeholders whose needs are being satisfied. The suggested distinction between needs and satisfiers remedies their conflation in previous research and enables a discussion of conditions for sustainable stakeholder value creation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旁观者眼中:利益相关者对可持续商业模式的感知价值
商业模式的可持续性通常取决于它们为广泛的利益相关者创造的价值。这个价值主要是通过聚合宏观层面的社会、生态和经济价值三重底线(TBL)维度来概念化的。然而,很少有商业模式研究能够解释利益相关者为什么以及如何在商业模式中看到这种价值。一个有问题的回顾揭示了TBL宏观层面和利益相关者微观层面分析的合并,导致了关于价值内容和接受者的模糊。本文采用以接受者为中心(战略)管理的微观洞察为基础的感知价值理念,对生态价值、社会价值和经济价值的构建进行了改革。基于主观性和异质性、片面性和非线性、情境特异性和短暂性、溢出性、相关性和经验性、特质性、不可通约性和相互依赖性等特征,分析了价值感知、需求实现和需求满足者之间的关系。该分析强调了基于利益相关者对需求实现的感知的价值创造理论。它表明利益相关者的价值创造只能通过其需求得到满足的利益相关者来理解。需求和满足因素之间的建议区别弥补了它们在以前的研究中的混淆,并使可持续利益相关者价值创造的条件得以讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Long Range Planning (LRP) is an internationally renowned journal specializing in the field of strategic management. Since its establishment in 1968, the journal has consistently published original research, garnering a strong reputation among academics. LRP actively encourages the submission of articles that involve empirical research and theoretical perspectives, including studies that provide critical assessments and analysis of the current state of knowledge in crucial strategic areas. The primary user base of LRP primarily comprises individuals from academic backgrounds, with the journal playing a dual role within this community. Firstly, it serves as a platform for the dissemination of research findings among academic researchers. Secondly, it serves as a channel for the transmission of ideas that can be effectively utilized in educational settings. The articles published in LRP cater to a diverse audience, including practicing managers and students in professional programs. While some articles may focus on practical applications, others may primarily target academic researchers. LRP adopts an inclusive approach to empirical research, accepting studies that draw on various methodologies such as primary survey data, archival data, case studies, and recognized approaches to data collection.
期刊最新文献
Strength in numbers: Scale, scope, and performance in multipartner alliances A layered governance approach to regulating Big Tech How Do Platform Multinational Corporations (PMNCs) Address Emerging Challenges in the Global Landscape? A ‘READ’ Framework The dual-edged sword effect of reciprocal information exchanges within partnerships on performance: The mediating role of creativity New blood brings change: Exploring the link between rookie independent directors and corporate cash holdings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1