Impact of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) on progression free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients (NDMM) with high risk cytogenetic abnormalities.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4149/BLL_2024_002
Tomas Guman, Jan Sykora
{"title":"Impact of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) on progression free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients (NDMM) with high risk cytogenetic abnormalities.","authors":"Tomas Guman, Jan Sykora","doi":"10.4149/BLL_2024_002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>ASCT has been considered the standard of care for younger patients with NDMM, however, not all the studies published so far have uniformly demonstrated the complete superiority of ASCT over chemotherapy at standard doses. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies has shown a significant benefit with single ASCT in terms of prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), but not of overall survival (OS). In our retrospective analysis we investigated the impact of high dose (HD) chemotherapy followed by ASCT in special population of patients with high risk cytogenetic profile on the PFS and treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of NDMM patients eligible for HD chemotherapy followed by upfront ASCT in the era of novel agents, who underwent the ASCT in the Department of hematology and oncohematology LF UPJŠ and UNLP Košice in the timeframe of 54 months (from 01/JAN/2019 to 30/JUN/2023). Patients were stratified according to their cytogenetic profile. PFS was defined by the time from ASCT to the disease progression. The OS was defined as the time from the the start of treatment to the death from disease progression. The high risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA) were defined as t(4;14), del(17/17p), t(14;16), t(14;20), nonhyperploidy, gain (1q).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion criteria were met by 65 patients with NDMM who received HD chemotherpy followed by ASCT. We identified 22 (33.8 %) patients with HRCA and 43 (66.2 %) patients with standard cytogenetic risk. During the monitored period we recorded 4 deaths due to disease progression, all of them in the HCRA subgroup. The response was enhanced by the ASCT in both subgroups. The very good partial response (VGPR) increased from 42 % to 46 % and complete remission (CR) increased from 23 % to 45 % after the ASCT. The number of patients achieving only partial response (PR) decreased from 35 % to 9 % after ASCT. In the subgroup of patients with HRCA the median PFS after ASCT was lower compared to the patients with standard cytogenetic risk (17 vs 38 months). The average PFS in both subgroups was 22.9 months. The median OS in both subgroups was not reached, however the only deaths due to disease progression were recorded in the HRCA subgroup. At the time of analysis, 100 % (43) of patients are alive in the standard cytogenetic subgroup versus 72 % (18) of patients in HRCA subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HD chemotherapy followed by ASCT remains the standard of care for NDMM eligible for high dose chemotherapy. Our results confirm the benefit of ASCT even in the presence of HRCA. Lower PFS in the HRCA subgroup might indicate the need for more intensive treatment, which may be achieved by tandem ASCT defined as two ASCT performed within a period of no more than six months. Additionally, as three- and four-drug induction therapies are becoming increasingly available and effective, resulting in high minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rates, it is important to continue discussing and further personalizing upfront ASCT to avoid overtreatment and possible toxicities especially in the non-high-risk patient population (Tab. 5, Fig. 2, Ref. 9).</p>","PeriodicalId":55328,"journal":{"name":"Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4149/BLL_2024_002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: ASCT has been considered the standard of care for younger patients with NDMM, however, not all the studies published so far have uniformly demonstrated the complete superiority of ASCT over chemotherapy at standard doses. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies has shown a significant benefit with single ASCT in terms of prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), but not of overall survival (OS). In our retrospective analysis we investigated the impact of high dose (HD) chemotherapy followed by ASCT in special population of patients with high risk cytogenetic profile on the PFS and treatment outcome.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of NDMM patients eligible for HD chemotherapy followed by upfront ASCT in the era of novel agents, who underwent the ASCT in the Department of hematology and oncohematology LF UPJŠ and UNLP Košice in the timeframe of 54 months (from 01/JAN/2019 to 30/JUN/2023). Patients were stratified according to their cytogenetic profile. PFS was defined by the time from ASCT to the disease progression. The OS was defined as the time from the the start of treatment to the death from disease progression. The high risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA) were defined as t(4;14), del(17/17p), t(14;16), t(14;20), nonhyperploidy, gain (1q).

Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 65 patients with NDMM who received HD chemotherpy followed by ASCT. We identified 22 (33.8 %) patients with HRCA and 43 (66.2 %) patients with standard cytogenetic risk. During the monitored period we recorded 4 deaths due to disease progression, all of them in the HCRA subgroup. The response was enhanced by the ASCT in both subgroups. The very good partial response (VGPR) increased from 42 % to 46 % and complete remission (CR) increased from 23 % to 45 % after the ASCT. The number of patients achieving only partial response (PR) decreased from 35 % to 9 % after ASCT. In the subgroup of patients with HRCA the median PFS after ASCT was lower compared to the patients with standard cytogenetic risk (17 vs 38 months). The average PFS in both subgroups was 22.9 months. The median OS in both subgroups was not reached, however the only deaths due to disease progression were recorded in the HRCA subgroup. At the time of analysis, 100 % (43) of patients are alive in the standard cytogenetic subgroup versus 72 % (18) of patients in HRCA subgroup.

Conclusion: HD chemotherapy followed by ASCT remains the standard of care for NDMM eligible for high dose chemotherapy. Our results confirm the benefit of ASCT even in the presence of HRCA. Lower PFS in the HRCA subgroup might indicate the need for more intensive treatment, which may be achieved by tandem ASCT defined as two ASCT performed within a period of no more than six months. Additionally, as three- and four-drug induction therapies are becoming increasingly available and effective, resulting in high minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rates, it is important to continue discussing and further personalizing upfront ASCT to avoid overtreatment and possible toxicities especially in the non-high-risk patient population (Tab. 5, Fig. 2, Ref. 9).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自体干细胞移植(ASCT)对新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)高危细胞遗传学异常患者无进展生存(PFS)的影响
目的:ASCT一直被认为是年轻NDMM患者的标准治疗方法,然而,迄今为止发表的所有研究并没有一致证明ASCT在标准剂量下优于化疗。一项随机研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析显示,单次ASCT在延长无进展生存期(PFS)方面有显著益处,但在总生存期(OS)方面没有显著益处。在我们的回顾性分析中,我们调查了高剂量(HD)化疗后ASCT对具有高风险细胞遗传学特征的特殊人群的PFS和治疗结果的影响。方法:回顾性分析新药物时代符合HD化疗后前期ASCT的NDMM患者,在血液和肿瘤血液科LF UPJŠ和UNLP Košice接受ASCT的54个月时间(2019年1月1日至2023年6月30日)。根据患者的细胞遗传学特征对其进行分层。PFS由ASCT到疾病进展的时间来定义。OS定义为从治疗开始到疾病进展死亡的时间。高危细胞遗传学异常(HRCA)定义为t(4;14), del(17/17p), t(14;16), t(14;20),非高倍体,增益(1q)。结果:65例接受HD化疗后行ASCT的NDMM患者符合纳入标准。我们确定了22例(33.8%)HRCA患者和43例(66.2%)标准细胞遗传风险患者。在监测期间,我们记录了4例因疾病进展而死亡的病例,均属于HCRA亚组。在两个亚组中,ASCT均增强了反应。ASCT后,非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)从42%增加到46%,完全缓解(CR)从23%增加到45%。ASCT后仅部分缓解(PR)的患者数量从35%下降到9%。在HRCA患者亚组中,ASCT后的中位PFS低于标准细胞遗传学风险患者(17个月vs 38个月)。两组患者的平均PFS均为22.9个月。两个亚组的中位总生存期均未达到,但HRCA亚组中仅记录了因疾病进展导致的死亡。在分析时,标准细胞遗传学亚组中100%(43)的患者存活,而HRCA亚组中72%(18)的患者存活。结论:HD化疗后ASCT仍然是适合大剂量化疗的NDMM的标准治疗方法。我们的结果证实了ASCT的益处,即使在HRCA存在的情况下。在HRCA亚组中,较低的PFS可能表明需要更强化的治疗,这可能通过串联ASCT来实现,串联ASCT定义为在不超过6个月的时间内进行两次ASCT。此外,由于三药和四药诱导疗法的可用性和有效性越来越高,导致微小残留病(MRD)阴性率很高,因此继续讨论和进一步个性化前期ASCT以避免过度治疗和可能的毒性非常重要,特别是在非高危患者群体中(表5,图2,参考文献9)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The international biomedical journal - Bratislava Medical Journal – Bratislavske lekarske listy (Bratisl Lek Listy/Bratisl Med J) publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of biomedical sciences, including experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, original clinical studies and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Importance of CHB's grey zone: analysis of patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Prevalence of diastasis m. rectus abdominis and pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in postpartum women. The founding of the UPJS Faculty of Medicine from the memories of the first dean Prof. MUDr. Jan Knazovicky. 75th anniversary of the UPJS Faculty of Medicine in Kosice. The presence of glutathione peroxidase 8 (GPx8) in rat male genital organs. Use of hepatocyte transplantation after extensive liver resections in experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1