Validation of SARC-F-Proxy for the Screening of Sarcopenia in Older Patients with Cognitive Impairment.

Scott Lamers, Zaid Kasim, Wendy Daniella Rodríguez-García, Pishtiwan Kalmet, Stany Perkisas, Anne-Marie De Cock, Maurits Vandewoude
{"title":"Validation of SARC-F-Proxy for the Screening of Sarcopenia in Older Patients with Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Scott Lamers, Zaid Kasim, Wendy Daniella Rodríguez-García, Pishtiwan Kalmet, Stany Perkisas, Anne-Marie De Cock, Maurits Vandewoude","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-08-204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The SARC-F is a validated questionnaire for the screening of sarcopenia in an older population. However, the clinical relevance of this self-reported questionnaire in patients with cognitive problems is questionable. This study aims to validate the SARC-F-Proxy as an alternative screening tool for sarcopenia in patients with cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included hospitalised community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older with confirmed cognitive impairment. Three SARC-F questionnaires were completed: one by patients, one by informal caregivers and one by formal caregivers. Muscle strength, mass and physical performance were measured by handgrip strength, anthropometric measurements, and gait speed respectively. The recently updated EWGSOP2 diagnostic criteria were used as the \"gold standard\" for diagnosis of sarcopenia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of sarcopenia using SARC-F-Proxy was 75.4% for SARC-F-Proxy-Formal caregiver and 66% for SARC-F-Proxy-Informal caregiver. SARC-F-Proxy had high sensitivity (85.9% for SARC-F-Proxy-Formal caregiver and 77% for SARC-F-proxy-informal caregiver) and low specificity (46.5% for SARC-F-Proxy-Formal caregiver and 54.7% for SARC-F-Proxy-Informal caregiver).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the proxy-reported SARC-F questionnaire can be applied as a surrogate for the SARC-F in the screening of sarcopenia in hospitalised community-dwelling older people with known or suspected cognitive impairment. Second, the results in this study suggest a higher reliability when the proxy-reported questionnaire is performed by the formal caregiver.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"8 4","pages":"204-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-08-204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The SARC-F is a validated questionnaire for the screening of sarcopenia in an older population. However, the clinical relevance of this self-reported questionnaire in patients with cognitive problems is questionable. This study aims to validate the SARC-F-Proxy as an alternative screening tool for sarcopenia in patients with cognitive impairment.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included hospitalised community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older with confirmed cognitive impairment. Three SARC-F questionnaires were completed: one by patients, one by informal caregivers and one by formal caregivers. Muscle strength, mass and physical performance were measured by handgrip strength, anthropometric measurements, and gait speed respectively. The recently updated EWGSOP2 diagnostic criteria were used as the "gold standard" for diagnosis of sarcopenia.

Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia using SARC-F-Proxy was 75.4% for SARC-F-Proxy-Formal caregiver and 66% for SARC-F-Proxy-Informal caregiver. SARC-F-Proxy had high sensitivity (85.9% for SARC-F-Proxy-Formal caregiver and 77% for SARC-F-proxy-informal caregiver) and low specificity (46.5% for SARC-F-Proxy-Formal caregiver and 54.7% for SARC-F-Proxy-Informal caregiver).

Conclusions: the proxy-reported SARC-F questionnaire can be applied as a surrogate for the SARC-F in the screening of sarcopenia in hospitalised community-dwelling older people with known or suspected cognitive impairment. Second, the results in this study suggest a higher reliability when the proxy-reported questionnaire is performed by the formal caregiver.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARC-F-Proxy在老年认知障碍患者肌少症筛查中的应用验证
目的:SARC-F是一份有效的问卷,用于筛查老年人群中的肌肉减少症。然而,这种自我报告的问卷在认知问题患者中的临床相关性值得怀疑。本研究旨在验证SARC-F-Proxy作为认知障碍患者肌肉减少症的替代筛查工具。方法:这项横断面研究纳入了60岁或以上确诊认知障碍的住院社区老年人。完成三份SARC-F问卷:一份由患者填写,一份由非正式护理人员填写,一份由正式护理人员填写。肌肉力量、质量和身体表现分别通过握力、人体测量和步态速度来测量。最近更新的EWGSOP2诊断标准被用作诊断肌肉减少症的“金标准”。结果:使用SARC-F-Proxy的骨骼肌减少症患病率在SARC-F-Proxy-正式照护者中为75.4%,在SARC-F-Proxy-非正式照护者中为66%。SARC-F-Proxy具有高敏感性(对SARC-F-Proxy-正式照护者的敏感性为85.9%,对SARC-F-Proxy-非正式照护者的敏感性为77%)和低特异性(对SARC-F-Proxy-正式照护者的敏感性为46.5%,对SARC-F-Proxy-非正式照护者的敏感性为54.7%)。结论:代理报告的SARC-F问卷可以作为SARC-F的替代品,用于筛查已知或怀疑有认知障碍的住院社区老年人的肌肉减少症。其次,本研究的结果表明,当代理报告问卷由正式照顾者执行时,可靠性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Economic Cost Analysis of Implementing a Frailty Care Bundle to Reduce Risk of Hospital Associated Decline Among Older Patients. Can EWGSOP2 and SDOC Definitions of Sarcopenia Identify Functional Muscle Quality? Effects of an Oral Nutritional Supplementation and Physical Exercise Intervention on Older Adults at Risk for Sarcopenia. Examining the Cycle of Physical Frailty in Falls Clinic Attendees Through Structural Equation Modeling. Prognostic Impact of Each Item of the SARC-F Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery for Urologic Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1