Fall risk question-based tools for fall screening in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of the literature.

Chrysoula Argyrou, Yannis Dionyssiotis, Antonios Galanos, John Vlamis, Ioannis K Triantafyllopoulos, Ismene A Dontas, Efstathios Chronopoulos
{"title":"Fall risk question-based tools for fall screening in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Chrysoula Argyrou, Yannis Dionyssiotis, Antonios Galanos, John Vlamis, Ioannis K Triantafyllopoulos, Ismene A Dontas, Efstathios Chronopoulos","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-08-240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fall screening tools aim to accurately identify the high fall risk individuals. To increase ease of administration and cost-effectiveness many studies focus on question-based tools. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify question-based tools for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults over the age of 60 and the risk factors that are covered by these tools. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Data quality assessment was performed with the Ottawa-Newcastle scale. The results identified 20 studies that used 22 question-based tools to assess fall risk. The number of questions per tool varied from 1 to 41 questions. Data quality varied greatly, with values 3-9 for cohort and 2-7 for cross-sectional studies. The most commonly reported fall risk factors were fall history, feeling of unsteadiness, fear of falling, muscle strength, gait limitation and incontinence. Healthcare providers should use the above tools with caution regarding the limitations of each tool. Further studies should be designed to address individuals with high fall risk, such as individuals with cognitive impairment, as they are under-represented or excluded from most of the existing studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"8 4","pages":"240-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-08-240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fall screening tools aim to accurately identify the high fall risk individuals. To increase ease of administration and cost-effectiveness many studies focus on question-based tools. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify question-based tools for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults over the age of 60 and the risk factors that are covered by these tools. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Data quality assessment was performed with the Ottawa-Newcastle scale. The results identified 20 studies that used 22 question-based tools to assess fall risk. The number of questions per tool varied from 1 to 41 questions. Data quality varied greatly, with values 3-9 for cohort and 2-7 for cross-sectional studies. The most commonly reported fall risk factors were fall history, feeling of unsteadiness, fear of falling, muscle strength, gait limitation and incontinence. Healthcare providers should use the above tools with caution regarding the limitations of each tool. Further studies should be designed to address individuals with high fall risk, such as individuals with cognitive impairment, as they are under-represented or excluded from most of the existing studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在社区居住的老年人中进行跌倒风险筛查的基于问题的工具:文献的系统回顾。
跌倒筛查工具旨在准确识别高跌倒风险个体。为了提高管理的便利性和成本效益,许多研究集中在基于问题的工具上。本系统综述的目的是确定基于问题的工具,用于评估60岁以上社区居住老年人的跌倒风险,以及这些工具所涵盖的风险因素。遵循了PRISMA准则。在PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Science和Google Scholar中进行文献检索。采用渥太华-纽卡斯尔量表进行数据质量评估。结果确定了20项研究,使用22种基于问题的工具来评估跌倒风险。每个工具的问题数量从1个到41个不等。数据质量差异很大,队列研究的值为3-9,横断面研究的值为2-7。最常见的跌倒危险因素是跌倒史、不稳定感、害怕跌倒、肌肉力量、步态限制和失禁。医疗保健提供者应谨慎使用上述工具,注意每种工具的局限性。进一步的研究应该针对有高跌倒风险的个体,如有认知障碍的个体,因为他们在大多数现有研究中代表性不足或被排除在外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Economic Cost Analysis of Implementing a Frailty Care Bundle to Reduce Risk of Hospital Associated Decline Among Older Patients. Can EWGSOP2 and SDOC Definitions of Sarcopenia Identify Functional Muscle Quality? Effects of an Oral Nutritional Supplementation and Physical Exercise Intervention on Older Adults at Risk for Sarcopenia. Examining the Cycle of Physical Frailty in Falls Clinic Attendees Through Structural Equation Modeling. Prognostic Impact of Each Item of the SARC-F Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery for Urologic Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1