A Web-Based Mind-Body Intervention (Mindful Steps) for Promoting Walking in Chronic Cardiopulmonary Disease: Insights From a Qualitative Study.

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2023-12-02 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130231212169
Kristen M Kraemer, Karen Kilgore, Daniel Litrownik, Brianna Jean-Laurent, Peter M Wayne, Caroline R Richardson, Marilyn L Moy, Gloria Y Yeh
{"title":"A Web-Based Mind-Body Intervention (Mindful Steps) for Promoting Walking in Chronic Cardiopulmonary Disease: Insights From a Qualitative Study.","authors":"Kristen M Kraemer, Karen Kilgore, Daniel Litrownik, Brianna Jean-Laurent, Peter M Wayne, Caroline R Richardson, Marilyn L Moy, Gloria Y Yeh","doi":"10.1177/27536130231212169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the deleterious effects of physical inactivity in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or heart failure (HF), interventions that promote long-term daily physical activity are needed. Mindful Steps, designed to promote walking behaviors in COPD and HF, is a multicomponent intervention that integrates mind-body content with other self-regulatory components. The aim of the current qualitative study was to characterize participants' experiences with Mindful Steps and understand the perceived influence of the intervention on walking and health.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the context of a pilot randomized controlled feasibility trial comparing the year-long Mindful Steps program to usual care among individuals with COPD and HF, semi-structured qualitative interviews were administered at 6- and 12-months. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. The constant comparative method was used to code transcripts, identify categories, and develop interrelated themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen participants (63% female; <i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 70.2 years, <i>SD</i> = 6.95) who were randomized to the intervention group completed the 6-month interview and 17 completed the 12-month interview. The pedometer with feedback, live group classes, and mind-body videos were described as the most helpful intervention components. Participants learned several strategies that helped their walking (e.g., breathing regulation and awareness, body awareness, mind-body techniques, pacing), described walking as enjoyable, and identified internal reasons for walking (e.g., to feel good). They also reported several physical and mental health benefits of the intervention. Some participants reported limited influence of the intervention on walking or health. Many participants continued to use the strategies they learned in the first half of the intervention at 12-months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mind-body content of Mindful Steps appeared to positively influence walking behaviors. Participants' experiences with the intervention helped to identify areas for future intervention refinement. Future quantitative work is needed to corroborate these qualitative findings and assess the efficacy of the intervention on long-term physical activity engagement.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered in Clinical Trials.gov, ID number NCT01551953.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130231212169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given the deleterious effects of physical inactivity in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or heart failure (HF), interventions that promote long-term daily physical activity are needed. Mindful Steps, designed to promote walking behaviors in COPD and HF, is a multicomponent intervention that integrates mind-body content with other self-regulatory components. The aim of the current qualitative study was to characterize participants' experiences with Mindful Steps and understand the perceived influence of the intervention on walking and health.

Method: In the context of a pilot randomized controlled feasibility trial comparing the year-long Mindful Steps program to usual care among individuals with COPD and HF, semi-structured qualitative interviews were administered at 6- and 12-months. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. The constant comparative method was used to code transcripts, identify categories, and develop interrelated themes.

Results: Nineteen participants (63% female; Mage = 70.2 years, SD = 6.95) who were randomized to the intervention group completed the 6-month interview and 17 completed the 12-month interview. The pedometer with feedback, live group classes, and mind-body videos were described as the most helpful intervention components. Participants learned several strategies that helped their walking (e.g., breathing regulation and awareness, body awareness, mind-body techniques, pacing), described walking as enjoyable, and identified internal reasons for walking (e.g., to feel good). They also reported several physical and mental health benefits of the intervention. Some participants reported limited influence of the intervention on walking or health. Many participants continued to use the strategies they learned in the first half of the intervention at 12-months.

Conclusions: The mind-body content of Mindful Steps appeared to positively influence walking behaviors. Participants' experiences with the intervention helped to identify areas for future intervention refinement. Future quantitative work is needed to corroborate these qualitative findings and assess the efficacy of the intervention on long-term physical activity engagement.

Trial registration: This trial is registered in Clinical Trials.gov, ID number NCT01551953.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于网络的身心干预(正念步骤)促进慢性心肺疾病患者步行:来自定性研究的见解。
背景:考虑到慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和/或心力衰竭(HF)患者缺乏身体活动的有害影响,促进长期日常身体活动的干预措施是必要的。正念步骤,旨在促进COPD和HF患者的步行行为,是一种多成分干预,将身心内容与其他自我调节成分相结合。当前定性研究的目的是描述参与者的正念步法体验,并了解干预对步行和健康的感知影响。方法:在一项随机对照可行性试验的背景下,对慢性阻塞性肺病和心力衰竭患者进行为期一年的正念步骤计划与常规护理进行比较,在6个月和12个月时进行半结构化定性访谈。采访录音和文字记录。经常比较的方法被用来编码转录本,确定类别,并发展相互关联的主题。结果:19名参与者(63%为女性;年龄= 70.2岁,SD = 6.95),随机分为干预组,完成6个月的随访,17例完成12个月的随访。带反馈的计步器、现场小组课程和身心视频被认为是最有帮助的干预成分。参与者学习了几种有助于步行的策略(例如,呼吸调节和意识,身体意识,身心技巧,节奏),将步行描述为愉快的,并确定步行的内在原因(例如,感觉良好)。他们还报告了这种干预对身体和心理健康的一些好处。一些参与者报告说,干预对步行或健康的影响有限。许多参与者在12个月时继续使用他们在干预的前半段学到的策略。结论:正念步法的身心内容对步行行为有积极影响。参与者在干预方面的经验有助于确定未来干预改进的领域。未来的定量工作需要证实这些定性研究结果,并评估干预对长期体育活动参与的效果。试验注册:该试验已在Clinical Trials.gov注册,ID号NCT01551953。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Needs and Preferences for Remote-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. Using PROMIS Methodology to Create Self-Report Measures of Mindfulness and Related Concepts. Patient Experience and Attitudes Toward Electronic Intake and Patient-Reported Outcomes Within an Outpatient Whole Health Center. A Validation Study of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria for Assessing Mindfulness-Based Intervention Teacher Skill: Inter-Rater Reliability and Predictive Validity. Efficacy and Safety of Bacillus coagulans LBSC in Drug Induced Constipation Associated With Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Interventional, Parallel, Controlled Trial a Clinical Study on Bacillus coagulans LBSC for Drug Induced Constipation Associated With FGIDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1