Beyond the dominant voices: Unveiling Latin American perspectives on the international order

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Latin American Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1111/lamp.12319
Bernabé Malacalza
{"title":"Beyond the dominant voices: Unveiling Latin American perspectives on the international order","authors":"Bernabé Malacalza","doi":"10.1111/lamp.12319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concept of international order has undergone significant evolution, but the dominant voices of great powers have often overshadowed regional perspectives, particularly in Latin America. Still, this region has played a crucial role in shaping the contemporary discourse on the international order. Today, the term is used in various contexts within Latin America, reflecting the increasing presence of nonstate actors and the interdependent nature of societies and the planet overall. This article focuses on Latin American diplomacy and civil society's understandings of international order, contending that the region has developed analytical and practical approaches that converge into a normative vision centered on international justice. Both the analytical and practical approaches view the international order as a normative concept. Civil society especially perceives the international order as a practice concept, utilizing its voice and actions as instruments for change. Yet, civil society is not monolithic, and various groups seek different outcomes. This article reviews critically analytical and normative perspectives of the international order, providing a comprehensive understanding of Latin American viewpoints through various data collection methods.</p><p>关于国际秩序的概念已经发生了重大变化,但大国的主导性观点往往掩盖了地区观点,特别是在拉丁美洲。尽管如此,该地区在影响当代国际秩序话语方面发挥了至关重要的作用。如今,该术语被用于拉丁美洲的各种情境,反映了非国家行动者越来越多的存在以及社会和整个地球的相互依存性质。本文聚焦于拉美外交、以及公民社会对国际秩序的理解,认为该地区已提出了一系列分析方法和实践方法,这些方法汇聚成一个以国际正义为中心的规范愿景。分析方法和实践方法都将国际秩序视为一个规范概念。公民社会尤其将国际秩序视为一个实践概念,利用其观点和行动作为变革的工具。然而,公民社会并不是单一的整体,不同群体寻求不同的结果。本文批判述评了国际秩序的分析观点和规范观点,并通过不同的数据收集方法,对拉丁美洲的观点进行了全面理解。</p><p>El debate sobre el concepto de orden internacional ha experimentado una notable evolución en las últimas décadas, aun cuando las voces predominantes basadas en las grandes potencias continúan eclipsando a las perspectivas regionales, particularmente aquellas provenientes de América Latina. Sin embargo, cabe destacar que la región ha desempeñado un papel crucial en la configuración del discurso contemporáneo sobre el orden internacional. En la actualidad, el término se emplea en diversos contextos dentro del área, reflejando la creciente presencia de actores no estatales y la naturaleza interdependiente de las sociedades y el planeta en su conjunto. Este artículo se enfoca en analizar las perspectivas de la diplomacia y de la sociedad civil latinoamericanas acerca del orden internacional, argumentando que la región ha desarrollado enfoques tanto analíticos como prácticos que convergen en una visión normativa del orden, centrada en la justicia internacional. En particular, la sociedad civil percibe el orden internacional como un concepto práctico, utilizando su voz y acciones como instrumentos para el cambio. No obstante, no hay una concepción uniforme y, tanto en la sociedad civil como en la diplomacia latinoamericanas, existen diferentes narrativas. Teniendo en consideración esas realidades, se realiza una revisión crítica de las perspectivas analíticas y normativas del orden internacional, proporcionando una comprensión exhaustiva de los puntos de vista latinoamericanos a través de diversos métodos de recopilación de datos.</p>","PeriodicalId":42501,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Policy","volume":"14 4","pages":"492-509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lamp.12319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of international order has undergone significant evolution, but the dominant voices of great powers have often overshadowed regional perspectives, particularly in Latin America. Still, this region has played a crucial role in shaping the contemporary discourse on the international order. Today, the term is used in various contexts within Latin America, reflecting the increasing presence of nonstate actors and the interdependent nature of societies and the planet overall. This article focuses on Latin American diplomacy and civil society's understandings of international order, contending that the region has developed analytical and practical approaches that converge into a normative vision centered on international justice. Both the analytical and practical approaches view the international order as a normative concept. Civil society especially perceives the international order as a practice concept, utilizing its voice and actions as instruments for change. Yet, civil society is not monolithic, and various groups seek different outcomes. This article reviews critically analytical and normative perspectives of the international order, providing a comprehensive understanding of Latin American viewpoints through various data collection methods.

关于国际秩序的概念已经发生了重大变化,但大国的主导性观点往往掩盖了地区观点,特别是在拉丁美洲。尽管如此,该地区在影响当代国际秩序话语方面发挥了至关重要的作用。如今,该术语被用于拉丁美洲的各种情境,反映了非国家行动者越来越多的存在以及社会和整个地球的相互依存性质。本文聚焦于拉美外交、以及公民社会对国际秩序的理解,认为该地区已提出了一系列分析方法和实践方法,这些方法汇聚成一个以国际正义为中心的规范愿景。分析方法和实践方法都将国际秩序视为一个规范概念。公民社会尤其将国际秩序视为一个实践概念,利用其观点和行动作为变革的工具。然而,公民社会并不是单一的整体,不同群体寻求不同的结果。本文批判述评了国际秩序的分析观点和规范观点,并通过不同的数据收集方法,对拉丁美洲的观点进行了全面理解。

El debate sobre el concepto de orden internacional ha experimentado una notable evolución en las últimas décadas, aun cuando las voces predominantes basadas en las grandes potencias continúan eclipsando a las perspectivas regionales, particularmente aquellas provenientes de América Latina. Sin embargo, cabe destacar que la región ha desempeñado un papel crucial en la configuración del discurso contemporáneo sobre el orden internacional. En la actualidad, el término se emplea en diversos contextos dentro del área, reflejando la creciente presencia de actores no estatales y la naturaleza interdependiente de las sociedades y el planeta en su conjunto. Este artículo se enfoca en analizar las perspectivas de la diplomacia y de la sociedad civil latinoamericanas acerca del orden internacional, argumentando que la región ha desarrollado enfoques tanto analíticos como prácticos que convergen en una visión normativa del orden, centrada en la justicia internacional. En particular, la sociedad civil percibe el orden internacional como un concepto práctico, utilizando su voz y acciones como instrumentos para el cambio. No obstante, no hay una concepción uniforme y, tanto en la sociedad civil como en la diplomacia latinoamericanas, existen diferentes narrativas. Teniendo en consideración esas realidades, se realiza una revisión crítica de las perspectivas analíticas y normativas del orden internacional, proporcionando una comprensión exhaustiva de los puntos de vista latinoamericanos a través de diversos métodos de recopilación de datos.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越主导声音:揭示拉丁美洲对国际秩序的看法
国际秩序的概念经历了重大演变,但大国的主导声音往往掩盖了地区观点,尤其是在拉丁美洲。尽管如此,该地区在塑造当代国际秩序话语方面发挥了至关重要的作用。今天,该术语在拉丁美洲的各种情况下使用,反映了非国家行为体的日益存在以及社会和整个地球的相互依存性质。本文重点关注拉丁美洲外交和民间社会对国际秩序的理解,认为该地区已经发展出分析性和实践性的方法,这些方法汇集成一种以国际正义为中心的规范性愿景。分析方法和实践方法都把国际秩序视为一个规范的概念。民间社会尤其将国际秩序视为一种实践概念,利用其声音和行动作为变革的工具。然而,公民社会并非铁板一块,不同的群体追求不同的结果。本文回顾了国际秩序的批判性分析和规范性观点,通过各种数据收集方法提供了对拉丁美洲观点的全面理解。尽管如此,该地区在影响当代国际秩序话语方面发挥了至关重要的作用。如今,该术语被用于拉丁美洲的各种情境,反映了非国家行动者越来越多的存在以及社会和整个地球的相互依存性质。本文聚焦于拉美外交、以及公民社会对国际秩序的理解,认为该地区已提出了一系列分析方法和实践方法,这些方法汇聚成一个以国际正义为中心的规范愿景。分析方法和实践方法都将国际秩序视为一个规范概念。公民社会尤其将国际秩序视为一个实践概念,利用其观点和行动作为变革的工具。然而,公民社会并不是单一的整体,不同群体寻求不同的结果。本文批判述评了国际秩序的分析观点和规范观点,并通过不同的数据收集方法,对拉丁美洲的观点进行了全面理解。关于国际秩序的概念的辩论:在 )和在 ··· (·····)和在区域,特别是在 ··················在禁运期间,有一份关于región的电报desempeñado,一份关于《国际秩序》的重要文件,一份关于configuración论述的文件,一份关于contemporáneo国际秩序的文件。事实上,在不同的情况下,所有的 通讯通讯系统(通讯通讯系统(área))都是由不同的环境构成的,所有的行动者都是由自然环境构成的,所有的社会都是相互依存的,所有的星球都是由自然环境构成的。Este artículo通过社会和公民的方式从外交角度看问题,拉丁美洲国家从国际秩序角度看问题,讨论从国际秩序角度看问题,讨论从国际秩序角度看问题,讨论从国际秩序角度看问题,讨论从国际秩序角度看问题,讨论从国际秩序角度看问题,讨论从国际秩序角度看问题,讨论从国际秩序角度看问题,讨论从国际秩序角度看问题,讨论从国际秩序角度看问题。特别是,社会和民间的感知将使国际经济合作的概念更加清晰práctico,利用和利用经济合作的工具。没有obstante,没有干草una康塞普西翁uniforme y,太多en la皇家社会公民科莫en la diplomacia上面,existen不同narrativas。Teniendo en consideracion esa realidades, se realiza una修订critica de las perspectivas analiticas y normativas del orden国际队proporcionando una comprension exhaustiva de los分vista latinoamericanos traves德行为metodos de recopilacion de输出数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Latin American Policy
Latin American Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Latin American Policy (LAP): A Journal of Politics and Governance in a Changing Region, a collaboration of the Policy Studies Organization and the Escuela de Gobierno y Transformación Pública, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Santa Fe Campus, published its first issue in mid-2010. LAP’s primary focus is intended to be in the policy arena, and will focus on any issue or field involving authority and polities (although not necessarily clustered on governments), agency (either governmental or from the civil society, or both), and the pursuit/achievement of specific (or anticipated) outcomes. We invite authors to focus on any crosscutting issue situated in the interface between the policy and political domain concerning or affecting any Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) country or group of countries. This journal will remain open to multidisciplinary approaches dealing with policy issues and the political contexts in which they take place.
期刊最新文献
Inequality and Convergence in Latin American Regional Trade Agreements Assessing Latin America's Trade Blocs and Social Policies in Andean and Southern Cone Countries, and Considering Cuban Politics Programmatic Ideas Adopted Through Policy Diffusion in the Design of the Human Development Bonus (HDB) in Ecuador Variations in Design, But Similar Effects: Social Participation in the Andean Community, Mercosur, and the Central American Integration System Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1