Evaluation of a STAT MRI Protocol for Patients with Optic Disc Edema.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1097/WNO.0000000000002053
Alison B Gibbons, Peng Huang, Matthew Sklar, Philip Kim, Amanda D Henderson
{"title":"Evaluation of a STAT MRI Protocol for Patients with Optic Disc Edema.","authors":"Alison B Gibbons, Peng Huang, Matthew Sklar, Philip Kim, Amanda D Henderson","doi":"10.1097/WNO.0000000000002053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating patients with potentially sight-threatening conditions frequently involves urgent neuroimaging, and some providers recommend expediting emergency department (ED) evaluation. However, several factors may limit the practicality of ED evaluation. This pilot study assessed the feasibility and safety of a STAT magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol, designed to facilitate outpatient MRI within 48 hours of referral, compared with ED evaluation for patients with optic disc edema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed. Demographics, clinical data, and baseline ophthalmic measures were compared between patients in STAT and ED groups using the t test or Fisher exact test. Multivariate analyses compared changes in visual acuity (VA), visual field mean deviation (VF MD), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and edema grade between presentation and follow-up using a mixed-effects model adjusting for age, sex, and baseline measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 patients met the study criteria-24 (34.3%) in the STAT MRI cohort and 46 (65.7%) in the ED cohort. Demographic variables were similar between groups. Patients referred to the ED had worse VA ( P < 0.001), larger VF MD ( P < 0.001), and higher edema grade ( P = 0.002) at presentation. Four patients in the ED group and none in the STAT group were found to have space-occupying lesions. Multivariate analyses showed that follow-up measures were significantly associated with their baseline values (all P < 0.001) but not with referral protocol (all P > 0.099). The STAT MRI protocol was associated with lower average patient charges and hospital costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The STAT MRI protocol did not result in inferior visual outcomes or delay in life-threatening diagnoses. Urgent outpatient evaluation, rather than ED referral, seems safe for some patients with optic disc edema. These findings support continued utilization of the protocol and ongoing improvement efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"497-501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000002053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluating patients with potentially sight-threatening conditions frequently involves urgent neuroimaging, and some providers recommend expediting emergency department (ED) evaluation. However, several factors may limit the practicality of ED evaluation. This pilot study assessed the feasibility and safety of a STAT magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol, designed to facilitate outpatient MRI within 48 hours of referral, compared with ED evaluation for patients with optic disc edema.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed. Demographics, clinical data, and baseline ophthalmic measures were compared between patients in STAT and ED groups using the t test or Fisher exact test. Multivariate analyses compared changes in visual acuity (VA), visual field mean deviation (VF MD), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and edema grade between presentation and follow-up using a mixed-effects model adjusting for age, sex, and baseline measures.

Results: A total of 70 patients met the study criteria-24 (34.3%) in the STAT MRI cohort and 46 (65.7%) in the ED cohort. Demographic variables were similar between groups. Patients referred to the ED had worse VA ( P < 0.001), larger VF MD ( P < 0.001), and higher edema grade ( P = 0.002) at presentation. Four patients in the ED group and none in the STAT group were found to have space-occupying lesions. Multivariate analyses showed that follow-up measures were significantly associated with their baseline values (all P < 0.001) but not with referral protocol (all P > 0.099). The STAT MRI protocol was associated with lower average patient charges and hospital costs.

Conclusions: The STAT MRI protocol did not result in inferior visual outcomes or delay in life-threatening diagnoses. Urgent outpatient evaluation, rather than ED referral, seems safe for some patients with optic disc edema. These findings support continued utilization of the protocol and ongoing improvement efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估眼科急诊患者的 STAT MRI 方案。
背景:对可能危及视力的患者进行评估时,经常需要进行紧急神经影像检查,因此一些医疗机构建议加快急诊科(ED)评估。然而,一些因素可能会限制急诊科评估的实用性。这项试验性研究评估了 STAT 磁共振成像(MRI)方案的可行性和安全性,该方案旨在为视盘水肿患者在转诊后 48 小时内进行门诊磁共振成像提供便利,并与 ED 评估进行了比较:方法:对病历进行回顾性分析。采用 t 检验或费舍尔精确检验比较了 STAT 组和 ED 组患者的人口统计学特征、临床数据和眼科基线指标。使用混合效应模型比较了发病和随访期间视力(VA)、视野平均偏差(VF MD)、视网膜神经纤维层厚度和水肿等级的变化,并对年龄、性别和基线指标进行了调整:共有 70 名患者符合研究标准,其中 STAT MRI 组有 24 名(34.3%),ED 组有 46 名(65.7%)。两组患者的人口统计学变量相似。转诊至急诊室的患者就诊时视力较差(P < 0.001),VF MD较大(P < 0.001),水肿等级较高(P = 0.002)。ED 组中有四名患者被发现有空间占位性病变,而 STAT 组中没有发现。多变量分析表明,随访指标与基线值有显著相关性(均为 P <0.001),但与转诊方案无关(均为 P >0.099)。STAT MRI方案与较低的患者平均费用和住院费用相关:结论:STAT MRI 方案不会导致较差的视觉效果,也不会延误危及生命的诊断。对一些视盘水肿患者来说,紧急门诊评估而非急诊室转诊似乎是安全的。这些发现支持继续使用该方案并不断改进工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.80%
发文量
593
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology (JNO) is the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society (NANOS). It is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original and commissioned articles related to neuro-ophthalmology.
期刊最新文献
Advancing Optical Coherence Tomography Diagnostic Capabilities: Machine Learning Approaches to Detect Autoimmune Inflammatory Diseases. Recurrent Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension-Related Papilledema After Abrupt Discontinuation of Semaglutide. Prevalence and Clinical Associations of Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-like Structures in Craniosynostosis. Literature Commentary. Isla Williams, MD, MBBS, DO, FRACP, FRCPE (1934-2024).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1