Social media overload and proactive–reactive innovation behaviour: A TTSC framework perspective

IF 20.1 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE International Journal of Information Management Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102735
Suying Gao, Xue Zhao
{"title":"Social media overload and proactive–reactive innovation behaviour: A TTSC framework perspective","authors":"Suying Gao,&nbsp;Xue Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Based on the transactional theory of stress and coping, a theoretical model of social media overload and employees’ proactive–reactive innovation behaviour is constructed, in which emotional exhaustion and knowledge hiding serve as mediating variables, and the intrinsic mechanism of action among the variables is explained based on the conservation of resources theory. Study 1 tested the research model using data from 376 internal corporate social media users and their leaders. The results show that emotional exhaustion and knowledge hiding play a chain-mediating role between social media overload (information, communication, and social overload) and employees’ proactive and reactive innovation behaviours. Study 2 repeated Study 1′s hypothesis test using data from 406 internal corporate social media users. Most conclusions are consistent with Study 1, except that the relationships between communication overload and emotional exhaustion and between knowledge hiding and proactive innovation behaviour are not supported. These inconsistent conclusions may be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 2 revealed the moderating role of digital fluency. This study enriches the research on the dark side of social media use, expands the research perspective on social media overload, and provides new support for employees’ proactive–reactive innovation behaviours.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401223001160","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the transactional theory of stress and coping, a theoretical model of social media overload and employees’ proactive–reactive innovation behaviour is constructed, in which emotional exhaustion and knowledge hiding serve as mediating variables, and the intrinsic mechanism of action among the variables is explained based on the conservation of resources theory. Study 1 tested the research model using data from 376 internal corporate social media users and their leaders. The results show that emotional exhaustion and knowledge hiding play a chain-mediating role between social media overload (information, communication, and social overload) and employees’ proactive and reactive innovation behaviours. Study 2 repeated Study 1′s hypothesis test using data from 406 internal corporate social media users. Most conclusions are consistent with Study 1, except that the relationships between communication overload and emotional exhaustion and between knowledge hiding and proactive innovation behaviour are not supported. These inconsistent conclusions may be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 2 revealed the moderating role of digital fluency. This study enriches the research on the dark side of social media use, expands the research perspective on social media overload, and provides new support for employees’ proactive–reactive innovation behaviours.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体超载与积极主动的创新行为:TTSC框架视角
基于压力与应对的交易理论,构建了以情绪耗竭和知识隐藏为中介变量的社交媒体超载与员工主动-反应型创新行为的理论模型,并基于资源守恒理论解释了变量之间的内在作用机制。研究1使用来自376家企业内部社交媒体用户及其领导者的数据对研究模型进行了测试。结果表明,情绪耗竭和知识隐藏在社交媒体超载(信息、沟通和社交超载)与员工主动和被动创新行为之间起着链式中介作用。研究2使用来自406个企业内部社交媒体用户的数据重复了研究1的假设检验。除了不支持沟通超载与情绪耗竭、知识隐藏与主动创新行为之间的关系外,大部分结论与研究1一致。这些不一致的结论可能归因于COVID-19大流行。研究2揭示了数字流畅性的调节作用。本研究丰富了对社交媒体使用黑暗面的研究,拓展了对社交媒体超载的研究视角,为员工主动-被动创新行为提供了新的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
期刊最新文献
Using the influence of human-as-machine representation for self-improvement products The exploration of users’ perceived value from personalization and virtual conversational agents to enable a smart home assemblage– A mixed method approach Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology for sustainable technologies context Unrequited love? A mixed-methods study of parasocial engagement with social media influencers Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1