The pros and cons of a global carbon tax at a single rate

Alessandro Bacci
{"title":"The pros and cons of a global carbon tax at a single rate","authors":"Alessandro Bacci","doi":"10.1093/jwelb/jwac046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During 2021, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), though differently, supported the idea that to effectively tackle climate change, it is necessary to introduce a global price on carbon emissions. Generally, a single-rate Global Carbon Tax (GCT) for all carbon emissions would probably be the best mechanism to tax carbon emissions while still favouring trading relationships globally within a WTO-compliant environment. However, implementing a single-rate GCT is extremely complicated. The IMF has proposed the establishment of an International Carbon Price Floor (ICPF), but it has recognized that to work the ICPF needs multiple carbon price minima according to the considered countries’ category of development level. This article, which is divided into seven sections, reflects on the idea of introducing a GCT. Section 1 briefs the introduction. Section 2 explains what the main reason is for putting a price on carbon emissions and clarifies how the two most important price-setting mechanisms, ie an ETS and a carbon tax, work. Section 3 explains how to set the carbon tax rate. Section 4 analyses the IMF’s GCT proposal. Section 5 discusses the benefits of a GCT, especially if based on a single tax rate. Section 6 reviews what, at least in the short term, the three main obstacles to the implementation of a single-rate GCT are. Section 7 concludes.","PeriodicalId":501094,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of World Energy Law & Business","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of World Energy Law & Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwac046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During 2021, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), though differently, supported the idea that to effectively tackle climate change, it is necessary to introduce a global price on carbon emissions. Generally, a single-rate Global Carbon Tax (GCT) for all carbon emissions would probably be the best mechanism to tax carbon emissions while still favouring trading relationships globally within a WTO-compliant environment. However, implementing a single-rate GCT is extremely complicated. The IMF has proposed the establishment of an International Carbon Price Floor (ICPF), but it has recognized that to work the ICPF needs multiple carbon price minima according to the considered countries’ category of development level. This article, which is divided into seven sections, reflects on the idea of introducing a GCT. Section 1 briefs the introduction. Section 2 explains what the main reason is for putting a price on carbon emissions and clarifies how the two most important price-setting mechanisms, ie an ETS and a carbon tax, work. Section 3 explains how to set the carbon tax rate. Section 4 analyses the IMF’s GCT proposal. Section 5 discusses the benefits of a GCT, especially if based on a single tax rate. Section 6 reviews what, at least in the short term, the three main obstacles to the implementation of a single-rate GCT are. Section 7 concludes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球单一税率碳税的利弊
在2021年期间,国际货币基金组织(IMF)、经济合作与发展组织(OECD)和世界贸易组织(WTO)虽然立场不同,但都支持这样一种观点,即为了有效应对气候变化,有必要引入全球碳排放价格。一般来说,对所有碳排放征收单一税率的全球碳税(GCT)可能是对碳排放征税的最佳机制,同时仍有利于在符合世贸组织规定的环境中建立全球贸易关系。然而,实现单速率GCT是非常复杂的。国际货币基金组织(IMF)提议建立国际最低碳价(ICPF),但它也认识到,要使ICPF发挥作用,需要根据所考虑的国家的发展水平类别设定多个最低碳价。本文分为七个部分,讨论了引入GCT的思想。第1节简要介绍。第2节解释了为碳排放定价的主要原因,并阐明了两种最重要的定价机制(即碳排放交易体系和碳税)是如何运作的。第三节阐述了如何设定碳税率。第四节分析了IMF的GCT建议。第5节讨论了GCT的好处,特别是基于单一税率的GCT。第6节回顾了至少在短期内实施单一税率GCT的三个主要障碍是什么。第7节总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Good Oilfield Practice: its history and evolution Pathways to sustainable development: an overview of the progress and obstacles of hydroelectric power production in Angola Oil exporters and the challenges ahead: the role of NOCs in energy transitions A relaxation of European derivatives clearing legislation as a consequence of the 2021–2023 energy crisis Carbon capture and utilization under EU law: impermanent storage of CO2 in products and pre-combustion carbon capture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1