Clinical prediction model for interdisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation in osteoarthritis patients.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08071-1
Sophie Vervullens, Lissa Breugelmans, Laura Beckers, Sander M VAN Kuijk, Miranda VAN Hooff, Bjorn Winkens, Rob J Smeets
{"title":"Clinical prediction model for interdisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation in osteoarthritis patients.","authors":"Sophie Vervullens, Lissa Breugelmans, Laura Beckers, Sander M VAN Kuijk, Miranda VAN Hooff, Bjorn Winkens, Rob J Smeets","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08071-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a heterogenous condition, in which different subgroups are present. Individualized interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatments (IMPT) based on the biopsychosocial model have resulted in positive improvement of pain, health and disability in OA patients. Moreover, predictive factors for treatment success of IMPT in different musculoskeletal pain populations have been examined, but a clinical prediction model which informs whether an OA patient is expected to benefit or not from IMPT is currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model to inform patient-tailored care based on identified predictors for positive or negative outcomes of IMPT in patients with OA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Center for Integral Rehabilitation at six locations in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Chronic OA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data in this study were collected during January 2019 until January 2022. Participants underwent a 10-week IMPT program based on the biopsychosocial model. Treatment success was defined by a minimal decrease from baseline of 9 points on the Pain Disability Index (PDI). Candidate predictors were selected by experts in IMPT and literature review. Backward logistic regression analysis was performed to develop the clinical predication model and bootstrap validation was performed for internal validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 599 OA patients were included, of which 324 experienced treatment success. Thirty-four variables were identified as possible predictors for good IMPT outcome. Age, gender, number of pain locations, PDI baseline score, maximal pain severity, use of pain medication and alcohol, work ability, brief illness perceptions questionnaire subscales timeline, consequences, identity and treatment control, pain catastrophizing scale and self-efficacy questionnaire score were found as predictors for treatment success. The internally validated model has an acceptable discriminative power of 0.71.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reports a specific clinical prediction model for good outcome of IMPT in patients with OA. The internally validated model has an acceptable discriminative power of 0.71.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>After external validation, this model could be used to develop a clinically useful decision tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":"84-94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10938038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08071-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a heterogenous condition, in which different subgroups are present. Individualized interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatments (IMPT) based on the biopsychosocial model have resulted in positive improvement of pain, health and disability in OA patients. Moreover, predictive factors for treatment success of IMPT in different musculoskeletal pain populations have been examined, but a clinical prediction model which informs whether an OA patient is expected to benefit or not from IMPT is currently lacking.

Aim: The aim was to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model to inform patient-tailored care based on identified predictors for positive or negative outcomes of IMPT in patients with OA.

Design: Longitudinal prospective cohort study.

Setting: Center for Integral Rehabilitation at six locations in the Netherlands.

Population: Chronic OA patients.

Methods: Data in this study were collected during January 2019 until January 2022. Participants underwent a 10-week IMPT program based on the biopsychosocial model. Treatment success was defined by a minimal decrease from baseline of 9 points on the Pain Disability Index (PDI). Candidate predictors were selected by experts in IMPT and literature review. Backward logistic regression analysis was performed to develop the clinical predication model and bootstrap validation was performed for internal validation.

Results: Overall, 599 OA patients were included, of which 324 experienced treatment success. Thirty-four variables were identified as possible predictors for good IMPT outcome. Age, gender, number of pain locations, PDI baseline score, maximal pain severity, use of pain medication and alcohol, work ability, brief illness perceptions questionnaire subscales timeline, consequences, identity and treatment control, pain catastrophizing scale and self-efficacy questionnaire score were found as predictors for treatment success. The internally validated model has an acceptable discriminative power of 0.71.

Conclusions: This study reports a specific clinical prediction model for good outcome of IMPT in patients with OA. The internally validated model has an acceptable discriminative power of 0.71.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: After external validation, this model could be used to develop a clinically useful decision tool.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨关节炎患者跨学科生物心理社会康复的临床预测模型。
背景:骨关节炎(OA)是一种异质性疾病,存在不同的亚群。基于生物心理社会模型的个性化跨学科多模式疼痛治疗(IMPT)对OA患者的疼痛、健康和残疾有积极的改善。此外,已经研究了IMPT在不同肌肉骨骼疼痛人群中治疗成功的预测因素,但是目前缺乏一个临床预测模型来告知OA患者是否有望从IMPT中受益。目的:目的是开发并内部验证一个临床预测模型,根据确定的预测因素为OA患者的IMPT阳性或阴性结果提供量身定制的护理。设计:纵向前瞻性队列研究。环境:在荷兰六个地点的综合康复中心。人群:慢性OA患者。方法:本研究的数据收集于2019年1月至2022年1月。参与者进行了为期10周的基于生物心理社会模型的IMPT项目。治疗成功的定义是疼痛残疾指数(PDI)从基线最小降低9分。候选预测因子由IMPT专家和文献综述选出。采用logistic回归分析建立临床预测模型,采用bootstrap验证进行内部验证。结果:共纳入599例OA患者,其中324例治疗成功。34个变量被确定为IMPT预后良好的可能预测因子。年龄、性别、疼痛部位数量、PDI基线评分、最大疼痛严重程度、止痛药和酒精的使用、工作能力、简短疾病感知问卷子量表时间表、后果、身份和治疗控制、疼痛灾难化量表和自我效能问卷得分是治疗成功的预测因子。内部验证模型的可接受判别能力为0.71。结论:本研究报告了OA患者IMPT良好预后的特定临床预测模型。内部验证模型的可接受判别能力为0.71。临床康复影响:经外部验证,该模型可用于开发临床有用的决策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
期刊最新文献
Addressing the gap: stroke-related sarcopenia in Brazil. Behavior change theory and behavior change technique use in cancer rehabilitation interventions: a secondary analysis. The effect of patients' socioeconomic status in rehabilitation centers on the efficiency and performance. A continuum of balance performance between children with developmental coordination disorder, spastic cerebral palsy, and typical development. Efficacy of virtual reality on balance impairment in ataxic cerebral palsy children: randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1