The factor structure of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ): new methodological approaches and evidence.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1186/s41155-023-00280-0
Jhonys de Araujo, Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes, Enio Galinkin Jelihovschi
{"title":"The factor structure of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ): new methodological approaches and evidence.","authors":"Jhonys de Araujo, Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes, Enio Galinkin Jelihovschi","doi":"10.1186/s41155-023-00280-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The area of self-regulated learning integrates the fields of metacognition and self-regulation and assumes that the student is an active processor of information capable of self-regulating his learning by putting together the cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational components. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) is a benchmark for the measurement of self-regulated learning. However, the field of study does not show adequate evidence of its structural validity. The vast majority of studies involving this question present serious methodological mistakes, compromising the evidence of validity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study investigates the structural validity of MSLQ including all 15 scales and corrects relevant mistakes in the previous studies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We tested different models through item confirmatory factor analysis in a convenience sample of 670 college students (M = 22.8 years, SD = 5.2) from a public Brazilian university in the technological area. The models with the ML, MLR, MLM and WLMSV estimators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only WLSMV produced models with acceptable fit. The final model has a bi-factor structure with a general factor (self-regulated learning), 15 components as first-order factors, and four broad components as second-order factors. Twelve first-order components, all second-order components and the general factor had acceptable reliability. The components' elaboration, intrinsic goal orientation and metacognitive self-regulation, did not show acceptable reliability, in terms of McDonald's omega.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the worldwide importance of the MSLQ, we do not recommend the use of the measurement of these components for clinical practice and psychoeducational diagnosis until new studies show that this low reliability only occurs in our sample. Our study shows new evidence, correcting many previous methodological mistakes and producing initial evidence favorable to the factor structure of the MSLQ.</p>","PeriodicalId":46901,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-023-00280-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The area of self-regulated learning integrates the fields of metacognition and self-regulation and assumes that the student is an active processor of information capable of self-regulating his learning by putting together the cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational components. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) is a benchmark for the measurement of self-regulated learning. However, the field of study does not show adequate evidence of its structural validity. The vast majority of studies involving this question present serious methodological mistakes, compromising the evidence of validity.

Objective: Our study investigates the structural validity of MSLQ including all 15 scales and corrects relevant mistakes in the previous studies.

Method: We tested different models through item confirmatory factor analysis in a convenience sample of 670 college students (M = 22.8 years, SD = 5.2) from a public Brazilian university in the technological area. The models with the ML, MLR, MLM and WLMSV estimators.

Results: Only WLSMV produced models with acceptable fit. The final model has a bi-factor structure with a general factor (self-regulated learning), 15 components as first-order factors, and four broad components as second-order factors. Twelve first-order components, all second-order components and the general factor had acceptable reliability. The components' elaboration, intrinsic goal orientation and metacognitive self-regulation, did not show acceptable reliability, in terms of McDonald's omega.

Conclusion: Considering the worldwide importance of the MSLQ, we do not recommend the use of the measurement of these components for clinical practice and psychoeducational diagnosis until new studies show that this low reliability only occurs in our sample. Our study shows new evidence, correcting many previous methodological mistakes and producing initial evidence favorable to the factor structure of the MSLQ.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动机学习策略问卷的因素结构:新方法与证据。
背景:自我调节学习领域整合了元认知和自我调节领域,并假设学生是一个主动的信息处理者,能够通过将认知、元认知和动机成分组合在一起来自我调节他的学习。动机学习策略问卷(MSLQ)是衡量自我调节学习的基准。然而,研究领域并没有显示出足够的证据来证明其结构有效性。涉及这个问题的绝大多数研究都存在严重的方法错误,损害了证据的有效性。目的:本研究对包含全部15个量表的MSLQ的结构效度进行检验,并纠正前人研究中的相关错误。方法:采用项目验证性因子分析对巴西一所公立大学技术领域的670名大学生(M = 22.8岁,SD = 5.2)进行方便样本检验。具有ML、MLR、MLM和WLMSV估计器的模型。结果:只有WLSMV产生了可接受的拟合模型。最终模型具有双因素结构,其中一般因素(自我调节学习),15个成分为一阶因素,4个广泛成分为二阶因素。12个一阶分量、所有二阶分量和一般因子具有可接受的信度。就麦当劳omega而言,各组成部分的阐述、内在目标导向和元认知自我调节没有表现出可接受的信度。结论:考虑到MSLQ在世界范围内的重要性,我们不建议在临床实践和心理教育诊断中使用这些成分的测量,直到新的研究表明这种低可靠性只发生在我们的样本中。我们的研究提供了新的证据,纠正了许多以前的方法错误,并产生了有利于MSLQ因素结构的初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Psicologia: Reflexão & Crítica is a journal published three times a year by Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento (Psychology Graduate Program) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Its objective is to publish original works in the psychology field: articles, short reports on research and reviews as well as to present to the scientific community texts which reflect a significant contribution for the psychology field. The short title of the journal is Psicol. Refl. Crít. It must be used regarding bibliographies, footnotes, as well as bibliographical strips and references.
期刊最新文献
Morpho-orthographic segmentation on visual word recognition in Brazilian Portuguese speakers. The gaming disorder test and gaming disorder scale for adolescents: translation and validation among Vietnamese young adults. Adaptation of the normative rating procedure for the International Affective Picture System to a remote format. Psychometric properties of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form in a Peruvian sample. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of human-robot interaction self-efficacy scale in Chinese adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1