Hyperprolactinemia Due to Prolactinoma has an Adverse Impact on Bone Health with Predominant Impact on Trabecular Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Clinical Densitometry Pub Date : 2023-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101453
Lakshmi Nagendra , Deep Dutta , Sunetra Mondal , Nitin Kapoor , Ameya Joshi , Saptarshi Bhattacharya
{"title":"Hyperprolactinemia Due to Prolactinoma has an Adverse Impact on Bone Health with Predominant Impact on Trabecular Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Lakshmi Nagendra ,&nbsp;Deep Dutta ,&nbsp;Sunetra Mondal ,&nbsp;Nitin Kapoor ,&nbsp;Ameya Joshi ,&nbsp;Saptarshi Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background:</em><span> No meta-analysis has holistically analysed and summarized the effect of prolactin excess due to prolactinomas on bone mineral metabolism. We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge-gap. </span><em>Methods:</em><span> Electronic databases were searched for studies having patients with hyperprolactinemia<span> due to prolactinoma and the other being a matched control group. The primary outcome was to evaluate the differences in BMD Z-scores at different sites. The secondary outcomes of this study were to evaluate the alterations in bone mineral density, bone mineral content and the occurrence of fragility fractures. </span></span><em>Results:</em><span> Data from 4 studies involving 437 individuals was analysed to find out the impact of prolactinoma on bone mineral metabolism. Individuals with prolactinoma had significantly lower Z scores at the lumbar spine [MD -1.08 (95 % CI: -1.57 – -0.59); </span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 54 % (moderate heterogeneity)] but not at the femur neck [MD -1.31 (95 % CI: -3.07 – 0.45); <em>P</em> = 0.15; I<sup>2</sup> = 98 % (high heterogeneity)] as compared to controls. Trabecular thickness of the radius [MD -0.01 (95 % CI: -0.02 – -0.00); <em>P</em><span> = 0.0006], tibia [MD -0.01 (95 % CI: -0.02 – -0.00); P=0.03] and cortical thickness of the radius [MD -0.01 (95 % CI: -0.19 – -0.00); </span><em>P</em><span> = 0.04] was significantly lower in patients with prolactinoma as compared to controls. The occurrence of fractures was significantly higher in patients with prolactinoma as compared to controls [OR 3.21 (95 % CI: 1.64 – 6.26); </span><em>P</em> = 0.0006] <em>Conclusion:</em><span> Bone mass is adversely affected in patients with hyperprolactinemia due to prolactinoma with predominant effects on the trabecular bone.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695023001038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: No meta-analysis has holistically analysed and summarized the effect of prolactin excess due to prolactinomas on bone mineral metabolism. We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge-gap. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for studies having patients with hyperprolactinemia due to prolactinoma and the other being a matched control group. The primary outcome was to evaluate the differences in BMD Z-scores at different sites. The secondary outcomes of this study were to evaluate the alterations in bone mineral density, bone mineral content and the occurrence of fragility fractures. Results: Data from 4 studies involving 437 individuals was analysed to find out the impact of prolactinoma on bone mineral metabolism. Individuals with prolactinoma had significantly lower Z scores at the lumbar spine [MD -1.08 (95 % CI: -1.57 – -0.59); P < 0.0001; I2 = 54 % (moderate heterogeneity)] but not at the femur neck [MD -1.31 (95 % CI: -3.07 – 0.45); P = 0.15; I2 = 98 % (high heterogeneity)] as compared to controls. Trabecular thickness of the radius [MD -0.01 (95 % CI: -0.02 – -0.00); P = 0.0006], tibia [MD -0.01 (95 % CI: -0.02 – -0.00); P=0.03] and cortical thickness of the radius [MD -0.01 (95 % CI: -0.19 – -0.00); P = 0.04] was significantly lower in patients with prolactinoma as compared to controls. The occurrence of fractures was significantly higher in patients with prolactinoma as compared to controls [OR 3.21 (95 % CI: 1.64 – 6.26); P = 0.0006] Conclusion: Bone mass is adversely affected in patients with hyperprolactinemia due to prolactinoma with predominant effects on the trabecular bone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催乳素瘤引起的高催乳素血症对骨健康有不利影响,主要影响骨小梁:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:目前还没有meta分析全面分析和总结催乳素瘤所致催乳素过量对骨矿物质代谢的影响。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以解决这一知识差距。方法:检索电子数据库中有因催乳素瘤引起的高泌乳素血症患者的研究,另一个是匹配的对照组。主要结果是评估不同部位BMD z评分的差异。本研究的次要结果是评估骨矿物质密度、骨矿物质含量的变化和脆性骨折的发生。结果:我们分析了4项涉及437人的研究数据,以了解催乳素瘤对骨矿物质代谢的影响。泌乳素瘤患者腰椎Z评分明显较低[MD -1.08(95 % CI: -1.57 - -0.59);P & lt; 0.0001;I2 = 54 %(中度异质性)]但在股骨颈处没有[MD = 1.31(95 % CI: -3.07 - 0.45);P = 0.15;I2 = 98 %(高异质性)]与对照组相比。桡骨小梁厚度[MD: -0.01(95 % CI: -0.02 - -0.00);P = 0.0006),胫骨(MD -0.01(95 % CI: -0.02 - -0.00);P=0.03]、桡骨皮质厚度[MD = 0.01(95 % CI: -0.19 - -0.00);P = 0.04]与对照组相比,泌乳素瘤患者的P值显著降低。催乳素瘤患者骨折发生率明显高于对照组[OR 3.21(95 % CI: 1.64 - 6.26);[P = 0.0006]结论:催乳素瘤对高泌乳素血症患者骨量有不良影响,且以小梁骨为主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Journal of Clinical Densitometry 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics. Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.
期刊最新文献
Technical and biological reliability of pQCT measured bone and muscle tissue quality across the age-span Correlation between body composition and bone mineral density differs by sex and skeletal site in overweight and obese Chinese subjects Lumbar spine densitometry in people with spinal cord injury: Investigation of potential sources of errors Comparison of Mineral Density of Dental Structures of Ancient Human Skeletons from the Roman Period with Modern-Day Human Dental Structures Lumbar Osteoarthritis in Patients with Osteoporosis Evaluated with the Lane and Wilke Scale and its Effect on Dexa Scores
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1