Effects of new hypnotic drugs on cognition: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Q1 Medicine Sleep Medicine: X Pub Date : 2023-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100094
Mengzhen Zhou , Rujia Liu , Jiyou Tang , Shi Tang
{"title":"Effects of new hypnotic drugs on cognition: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Mengzhen Zhou ,&nbsp;Rujia Liu ,&nbsp;Jiyou Tang ,&nbsp;Shi Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Insomnia is a common disease, and the application of various types of sleeping pills for cognitive impairment is controversial, especially as different doses can lead to different effects. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the cognitive impairment caused by different sleeping pills to provide a theoretical basis for guiding clinicians in the selection of medication regimens.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether various different doses (low, medium and high) of anti-insomnia drugs, such as the dual-orexin receptor antagonist (DORA), zopiclone, eszopiclone and zolpidem, induce cognitive impairment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to September 20th, 2022 for keywords in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the therapeutic effects of DORA, eszopiclone, zopiclone and zolpidem on sleep and cognitive function. The primary outcomes were indicators related to cognitive characteristics, including scores on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and daytime alertness. The secondary outcomes were the indicators associated with sleep and adverse events. Continuous variables were expressed as the standard mean difference (SMD). Data were obtained through GetData 2.26 and analyzed by Stata v.15.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 8702 subjects were included in 29 studies. Eszopiclone<sub>high</sub> significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 3.00, 95 % CI: 1.86 to 4.13) compared with the placebo, and eszopiclone<sub>high</sub> significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 4.21, 95 % CI: 1.65 to 6.77; SMD = 3.95, 95 % CI: 1.38 to 6.51; SMD = 3.26, 95 % CI: 0.38 to 6.15; and SMD = 3.23, 95 % CI: 0.34 to 6.11) compared with zolpidem<sub>low</sub>, zolpidem<sub>high</sub>, DORA<sub>low</sub>, and eszopiclone<sub>mid</sub>, respectively. Compared with the placebo, zopiclone, zolpidem<sub>mid</sub>, and eszopiclone<sub>high</sub>, DORA significantly increased the TST (SMD = 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.11 to 3.67; SMD = 6.00, 95 % CI: 2.73 to 9.27; SMD = 1.89, 95 % CI: 0.90 to 2.88; and SMD = 1.70, 95 % CI: 0.42 to 2.99, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We recommend DORA as the best intervention for insomnia because it was highly effective in inducing and maintaining sleep without impairing cognition. Although zolpidem had a more pronounced effect on sleep maintenance, this drug is better for short-term use. Eszopiclone and zopiclone improved sleep, but their cognitive effects have yet to be verified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37065,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine: X","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590142723000344/pdfft?md5=27a972fd6f684f2317abf7764b50f35c&pid=1-s2.0-S2590142723000344-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590142723000344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Insomnia is a common disease, and the application of various types of sleeping pills for cognitive impairment is controversial, especially as different doses can lead to different effects. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the cognitive impairment caused by different sleeping pills to provide a theoretical basis for guiding clinicians in the selection of medication regimens.

Objective

To evaluate whether various different doses (low, medium and high) of anti-insomnia drugs, such as the dual-orexin receptor antagonist (DORA), zopiclone, eszopiclone and zolpidem, induce cognitive impairment.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to September 20th, 2022 for keywords in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the therapeutic effects of DORA, eszopiclone, zopiclone and zolpidem on sleep and cognitive function. The primary outcomes were indicators related to cognitive characteristics, including scores on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and daytime alertness. The secondary outcomes were the indicators associated with sleep and adverse events. Continuous variables were expressed as the standard mean difference (SMD). Data were obtained through GetData 2.26 and analyzed by Stata v.15.0.

Results

A total of 8702 subjects were included in 29 studies. Eszopiclonehigh significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 3.00, 95 % CI: 1.86 to 4.13) compared with the placebo, and eszopiclonehigh significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 4.21, 95 % CI: 1.65 to 6.77; SMD = 3.95, 95 % CI: 1.38 to 6.51; SMD = 3.26, 95 % CI: 0.38 to 6.15; and SMD = 3.23, 95 % CI: 0.34 to 6.11) compared with zolpidemlow, zolpidemhigh, DORAlow, and eszopiclonemid, respectively. Compared with the placebo, zopiclone, zolpidemmid, and eszopiclonehigh, DORA significantly increased the TST (SMD = 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.11 to 3.67; SMD = 6.00, 95 % CI: 2.73 to 9.27; SMD = 1.89, 95 % CI: 0.90 to 2.88; and SMD = 1.70, 95 % CI: 0.42 to 2.99, respectively).

Conclusion

We recommend DORA as the best intervention for insomnia because it was highly effective in inducing and maintaining sleep without impairing cognition. Although zolpidem had a more pronounced effect on sleep maintenance, this drug is better for short-term use. Eszopiclone and zopiclone improved sleep, but their cognitive effects have yet to be verified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型催眠药物对认知的影响:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
失眠是一种常见的疾病,不同类型的安眠药用于认知障碍的应用存在争议,特别是不同剂量会导致不同的效果。因此,有必要对不同安眠药引起的认知障碍进行评估,为指导临床医生选择用药方案提供理论依据。目的评价双食欲素受体拮抗剂(DORA)、佐匹克隆、艾司佐匹克隆、唑吡坦等不同剂量(低、中、高)抗失眠药物对认知功能损害的影响。方法检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Google Scholar等数据库,检索自成立之日至2022年9月20日的随机对照试验(rct)关键词,评价朵拉、艾司佐匹克隆、佐匹克隆和唑吡坦对睡眠和认知功能的影响。主要结果是与认知特征相关的指标,包括数字符号替代测试(DSST)的分数和白天的警觉性。次要结果是与睡眠和不良事件相关的指标。连续变量用标准均差(SMD)表示。数据通过GetData 2.26获取,使用Stata v.15.0进行分析。结果29项研究共纳入8702名受试者。与安慰剂相比,Eszopiclonehigh显著提高了日间警惕性评分(SMD = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.86 ~ 4.13), Eszopiclonehigh显著提高了日间警惕性评分(SMD = 4.21, 95% CI: 1.65 ~ 6.77;SMD = 3.95, 95% CI: 1.38 ~ 6.51;SMD = 3.26, 95% CI: 0.38 ~ 6.15;SMD = 3.23, 95% CI: 0.34 ~ 6.11),分别与zolpidlow、zolpidhigh、dorallow和eszopiclonemid相比。与安慰剂、佐匹克隆、唑吡胺和艾索匹克隆相比,DORA显著提高了TST (SMD = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.11 ~ 3.67;SMD = 6.00, 95% CI: 2.73 ~ 9.27;SMD = 1.89, 95% CI: 0.90 ~ 2.88;SMD = 1.70, 95% CI分别为0.42 ~ 2.99)。结论朵拉能有效诱导和维持睡眠,且不影响认知功能,是治疗失眠症的最佳干预措施。虽然唑吡坦对维持睡眠有更明显的效果,但这种药物更适合短期使用。艾索匹克隆和佐匹克隆改善了睡眠,但它们对认知的影响尚未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine: X
Sleep Medicine: X Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mind at rest, mind at risk: A prospective population-based study of sleep and subsequent mental disorders Determinants of variations in sleep patterns across Brazil: Exploring geographic influences Comparative efficacy of sodium oxybate versus placebo on improvement of nighttime sleep in adult patients with narcolepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Erratum to “Sleep body position correlates with cognitive performance in middle-old obstructive sleep apnea subjects” [Sleep Med: X 4 (2022) 100050] Erratum to “The importance of sleep studies in improving the health indices of a nation” [Sleep Med: X 4 (2022) 100049]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1