Competency Models for Information Security and Cybersecurity Professionals: Analysis of Existing Work and a New Model

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES ACM Transactions on Computing Education Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3573205
Daniel Bendler, Michael Felderer
{"title":"Competency Models for Information Security and Cybersecurity Professionals: Analysis of Existing Work and a New Model","authors":"Daniel Bendler, Michael Felderer","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3573205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Competency models are widely adopted frameworks that are used to improve human resource functions and education. However, the characteristics of competency models related to the information security and cybersecurity domains are not well understood. To bridge this gap, this study investigates the current state of competency models related to the security domain through qualitative content analysis. Additionally, based on the competency model analysis, an evidence-based competency model is proposed. Examining the content of 27 models, we found that the models can benefit target groups in many different ways, ranging from policymaking to performance management. Owing to their many uses, competency models can arguably help to narrow the skills gap from which the profession is suffering. Nonetheless, the models have their shortcomings. First, the models do not cover all of the topics specified by the Cybersecurity Body of Knowledge (i.e., no model is complete). Second, by omitting social, personal, and methodological competencies, many models reduce the competency profile of a security expert to professional competencies. Addressing the limitations of previous work, the proposed competency model provides a holistic view of the competencies required by security professionals for job achievement and can potentially benefit both the education system and the labor market. To conclude, the implications of the competency model analysis and use cases of the proposed model are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48764,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","volume":"36 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3573205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Competency models are widely adopted frameworks that are used to improve human resource functions and education. However, the characteristics of competency models related to the information security and cybersecurity domains are not well understood. To bridge this gap, this study investigates the current state of competency models related to the security domain through qualitative content analysis. Additionally, based on the competency model analysis, an evidence-based competency model is proposed. Examining the content of 27 models, we found that the models can benefit target groups in many different ways, ranging from policymaking to performance management. Owing to their many uses, competency models can arguably help to narrow the skills gap from which the profession is suffering. Nonetheless, the models have their shortcomings. First, the models do not cover all of the topics specified by the Cybersecurity Body of Knowledge (i.e., no model is complete). Second, by omitting social, personal, and methodological competencies, many models reduce the competency profile of a security expert to professional competencies. Addressing the limitations of previous work, the proposed competency model provides a holistic view of the competencies required by security professionals for job achievement and can potentially benefit both the education system and the labor market. To conclude, the implications of the competency model analysis and use cases of the proposed model are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息安全和网络安全专业人员的胜任力模型:现有工作分析与新模型
胜任力模型是广泛采用的框架,用于改善人力资源职能和教育。然而,与信息安全和网络安全领域相关的胜任力模型的特征并没有得到很好的理解。为了弥补这一差距,本研究通过定性的内容分析来调查与安全领域相关的胜任力模型的现状。在胜任力模型分析的基础上,提出了基于证据的胜任力模型。通过研究27个模型的内容,我们发现这些模型可以以许多不同的方式使目标群体受益,从政策制定到绩效管理。由于其多种用途,能力模型可以帮助缩小该行业正在遭受的技能差距。尽管如此,这些模型也有其不足之处。首先,这些模型没有涵盖网络安全知识体系指定的所有主题(即,没有一个模型是完整的)。其次,通过忽略社会、个人和方法能力,许多模型将安全专家的能力概况降低为专业能力。针对先前工作的局限性,提出的胜任力模型提供了安全专业人员工作成就所需胜任力的整体视图,并且可能对教育系统和劳动力市场都有潜在的好处。最后,讨论了胜任力模型分析的意义和所提出模型的用例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computing Education
ACM Transactions on Computing Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) (formerly named JERIC, Journal on Educational Resources in Computing) covers diverse aspects of computing education: traditional computer science, computer engineering, information technology, and informatics; emerging aspects of computing; and applications of computing to other disciplines. The common characteristics shared by these papers are a scholarly approach to teaching and learning, a broad appeal to educational practitioners, and a clear connection to student learning.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating ChatGPT-4 Vision on Brazil’s National Undergraduate Computer Science Exam Understanding Informatics in Continuing Vocational Education and Training Data in Germany Intent and Extent: Computer Science Concepts and Practices in Integrated Computing Creating Apps for Community and Social Good: Preliminary Learning Outcomes from a Middle School Computer Science Curriculum Doing and Defining Interdisciplinarity in Undergraduate Computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1